Login Required

This content is restricted to University of Auckland staff and students. Log in with your username to view.

Log in

More about logging in

Parliament TV provides live broadcasts from the House of Representatives. Coverage: Questions for Oral Answer.

Primary Title
  • Parliament TV: Questions for Oral Answer
Date Broadcast
  • Tuesday 30 May 2017
Start Time
  • 14 : 00
Finish Time
  • 15 : 30
Duration
  • 90:00
Channel
  • Parliament TV
Broadcaster
  • Kordia
Programme Description
  • Parliament TV provides live broadcasts from the House of Representatives. Coverage: Questions for Oral Answer.
Classification
  • Not Classified
Owning Collection
  • Chapman Archive
Broadcast Platform
  • Television
Languages
  • English
Captions
Live Broadcast
  • Yes
Rights Statement
  • Made for the University of Auckland's educational use as permitted by the Screenrights Licensing Agreement.
This This programme This programme is This programme is live This programme is live captioned This programme is live captioned by This programme is live captioned by Ericsson This programme is live captioned by Ericsson Access This programme is live captioned by Ericsson Access Services Ericsson Access Services for Ericsson Access Services for the Ericsson Access Services for the Office Ericsson Access Services for the Office of Ericsson Access Services for the Office of the Ericsson Access Services for the Office of the Clerk for the Office of the Clerk of for the Office of the Clerk of the for the Office of the Clerk of the House for the Office of the Clerk of the House of for the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. Almighty Almighty God, Almighty God, humbly Almighty God, humbly acknowledging Almighty God, humbly acknowledging our Almighty God, humbly acknowledging our need Almighty God, humbly acknowledging our need for humbly acknowledging our need for your humbly acknowledging our need for your guidance humbly acknowledging our need for your guidance in humbly acknowledging our need for your guidance in all humbly acknowledging our need for your guidance in all things, your guidance in all things, and your guidance in all things, and laying your guidance in all things, and laying aside your guidance in all things, and laying aside all your guidance in all things, and laying aside all private and laying aside all private and and laying aside all private and personal and laying aside all private and personal interests, and personal interests, we and personal interests, we ask and personal interests, we ask that and personal interests, we ask that you and personal interests, we ask that you grant we ask that you grant that we ask that you grant that we we ask that you grant that we may we ask that you grant that we may conduct we ask that you grant that we may conduct the we ask that you grant that we may conduct the affairs that we may conduct the affairs of that we may conduct the affairs of this that we may conduct the affairs of this House that we may conduct the affairs of this House and that we may conduct the affairs of this House and of that we may conduct the affairs of this House and of our that we may conduct the affairs of this House and of our country of this House and of our country to of this House and of our country to the of this House and of our country to the glory of this House and of our country to the glory of of this House and of our country to the glory of your of this House and of our country to the glory of your holy of this House and of our country to the glory of your holy name, to the glory of your holy name, the to the glory of your holy name, the maintenance to the glory of your holy name, the maintenance of to the glory of your holy name, the maintenance of true to the glory of your holy name, the maintenance of true religion the maintenance of true religion and the maintenance of true religion and justice, and justice, the and justice, the honour and justice, the honour of and justice, the honour of the and justice, the honour of the Queen, the honour of the Queen, and the honour of the Queen, and the the honour of the Queen, and the public the honour of the Queen, and the public welfare, the honour of the Queen, and the public welfare, peace, and the public welfare, peace, and and the public welfare, peace, and tranquillity and the public welfare, peace, and tranquillity of and the public welfare, peace, and tranquillity of New and the public welfare, peace, and tranquillity of New Zealand, and tranquillity of New Zealand, through and tranquillity of New Zealand, through Jesus and tranquillity of New Zealand, through Jesus Christ and tranquillity of New Zealand, through Jesus Christ our and tranquillity of New Zealand, through Jesus Christ our Lord. through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. I I am I am sure I am sure that I am sure that members I am sure that members would I am sure that members would wish I am sure that members would wish to I am sure that members would wish to welcome I am sure that members would wish to welcome Mr I am sure that members would wish to welcome Mr Neil I am sure that members would wish to welcome Mr Neil Angus, I am sure that members would wish to welcome Mr Neil Angus, Chair I am sure that members would wish to welcome Mr Neil Angus, Chair of I am sure that members would wish to welcome Mr Neil Angus, Chair of the welcome Mr Neil Angus, Chair of the Accountability welcome Mr Neil Angus, Chair of the Accountability and welcome Mr Neil Angus, Chair of the Accountability and Oversight Accountability and Oversight Committee Accountability and Oversight Committee of Accountability and Oversight Committee of the Accountability and Oversight Committee of the Parliament Accountability and Oversight Committee of the Parliament of Committee of the Parliament of Victoria, Committee of the Parliament of Victoria, Australia, Committee of the Parliament of Victoria, Australia, and Committee of the Parliament of Victoria, Australia, and delegates, Victoria, Australia, and delegates, who Victoria, Australia, and delegates, who are Victoria, Australia, and delegates, who are present Victoria, Australia, and delegates, who are present in Victoria, Australia, and delegates, who are present in the Victoria, Australia, and delegates, who are present in the gallery. <APPLAUSE> Positions Positions have Positions have been Positions have been delivered Positions have been delivered to Positions have been delivered to the Positions have been delivered to the Clerk Positions have been delivered to the Clerk for Positions have been delivered to the Clerk for presentation. Petition Petition of Petition of Faye Petition of Faye Murray Petition of Faye Murray on Petition of Faye Murray on behalf Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Nga Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Nga Uri Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Nga Uri O Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Nga Uri O Hemi Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Nga Uri O Hemi Rua Petition of Faye Murray on behalf of the Nga Uri O Hemi Rua Paeara of the Nga Uri O Hemi Rua Paeara Whanau of the Nga Uri O Hemi Rua Paeara Whanau Trust of the Nga Uri O Hemi Rua Paeara Whanau Trust requesting of the Nga Uri O Hemi Rua Paeara Whanau Trust requesting that Whanau Trust requesting that House Whanau Trust requesting that House decline Whanau Trust requesting that House decline to Whanau Trust requesting that House decline to pass The The bill The bill until The bill until the The bill until the inquiry The bill until the inquiry into The bill until the inquiry into the The bill until the inquiry into the Waitangi The bill until the inquiry into the Waitangi Tribunal The bill until the inquiry into the Waitangi Tribunal claim The bill until the inquiry into the Waitangi Tribunal claim has The bill until the inquiry into the Waitangi Tribunal claim has been Waitangi Tribunal claim has been carried Waitangi Tribunal claim has been Committee Petition Petition of Petition of Phyl Petition of Phyl Phipps Petition of Phyl Phipps requesting Petition of Phyl Phipps requesting that Petition of Phyl Phipps requesting that the Petition of Phyl Phipps requesting that the House Petition of Phyl Phipps requesting that the House urge requesting that the House urge the requesting that the House urge the National-led requesting that the House urge the National-led Government requesting that the House urge the National-led Government to requesting that the House urge the National-led Government to fund the National-led Government to fund the the National-led Government to fund the design, the National-led Government to fund the design, construction the National-led Government to fund the design, construction and the National-led Government to fund the design, construction and ongoing the design, construction and ongoing management the design, construction and ongoing management of the design, construction and ongoing management of a the design, construction and ongoing management of a new the design, construction and ongoing management of a new integrated management of a new integrated public management of a new integrated public health management of a new integrated public health facility management of a new integrated public health facility in management of a new integrated public health facility in Westport. Those Those stand Those stand referred Those stand referred to Those stand referred to the Those stand referred to the select Those stand referred to the select committee Those stand referred to the select committee allocated Those stand referred to the select committee allocated by Those stand referred to the select committee allocated by the Those stand referred to the select committee allocated by the Clerk. Those stand referred to the select committee allocated by the Clerk. No committee allocated by the Clerk. No papers committee allocated by the Clerk. No public committee allocated by the Clerk. No papers have been committee allocated by the Clerk. No papers have been presented. committee allocated by the Clerk. No papers have been presented. Select papers have been presented. Select committee papers have been presented. Select papers papers have been presented. Select committee Reports have papers have been presented. Select committee Reports have been committee Reports have been delivered committee Reports have been delivered for committee Reports have been delivered for presentation. Report Report of Report of the Report of the Health Report of the Health Committee Report of the Health Committee on Report of the Health Committee on the Report of the Health Committee on the Health Report of the Health Committee on the Health (Fluoridation on the Health (Fluoridation Of on the Health (Fluoridation Of Drinking on the Health (Fluoridation Of Drinking Water) Of Drinking Water) Amendment Of Drinking Water) Amendment Bill. Amendment Bill. Reports Amendment Bill. Reports of Amendment Bill. Reports of the Amendment Bill. Reports of the Law Amendment Bill. Reports of the Law and Amendment Bill. Reports of the Law and Order Reports of the Law and Order Committee Reports of the Law and Order Committee on Reports of the Law and Order Committee on the Reports of the Law and Order Committee on the petition Reports of the Law and Order Committee on the petition 2014/0082 Committee on the petition 2014/0082 of Committee on the petition 2014/0082 of Susie Committee on the petition 2014/0082 of Susie Purkiss Committee on the petition 2014/0082 of Susie Purkiss and Committee on the petition 2014/0082 of Susie Purkiss and Philip Committee on the petition 2014/0082 of Susie Purkiss and Philip Thomas of Susie Purkiss and Philip Thomas John of Susie Purkiss and Philip Thomas John Coles. John Coles. Petition John Coles. Petition of Petition of of Petition of of James Petition of of James Robin Petition of of James Robin Casson of James Robin Casson and of James Robin Casson and Neil of James Robin Casson and Neil Tolan. and Neil Tolan. The and Neil Tolan. The Bill and Neil Tolan. The Bill is and Neil Tolan. The Bill is set and Neil Tolan. The Bill is set down The Bill is set down for The Bill is set down for second The Bill is set down for second reading. No No bills No bills have No bills have been No bills have been introduced. No bills have been introduced. Honourable No bills have been introduced. Honourable members, No bills have been introduced. Honourable members, on No bills have been introduced. Honourable members, on Wednesday Honourable members, on Wednesday last Honourable members, on Wednesday last week Honourable members, on Wednesday last week Chris Honourable members, on Wednesday last week Chris Hipkins Honourable members, on Wednesday last week Chris Hipkins asked Honourable members, on Wednesday last week Chris Hipkins asked that Honourable members, on Wednesday last week Chris Hipkins asked that I last week Chris Hipkins asked that I consider last week Chris Hipkins asked that I consider the last week Chris Hipkins asked that I consider the adequacy last week Chris Hipkins asked that I consider the adequacy of last week Chris Hipkins asked that I consider the adequacy of some consider the adequacy of some replies consider the adequacy of some replies to consider the adequacy of some replies to written consider the adequacy of some replies to written questions. consider the adequacy of some replies to written questions. The replies to written questions. The particular replies to written questions. The replies replies to written questions. The particular situation raised replies to written questions. The particular situation raised with replies to written questions. The particular situation raised with me particular situation raised with me was particular situation raised with me was when particular situation raised with me was when a particular situation raised with me was when a select particular situation raised with me was when a select committee particular situation raised with me was when a select committee rejects was when a select committee rejects or was when a select committee rejects or edits was when a select committee rejects or edits an was when a select committee rejects or edits an estimates was when a select committee rejects or edits an estimates or was when a select committee rejects or edits an estimates or annual or edits an estimates or annual review or edits an estimates or annual review question. or edits an estimates or annual review question. A or edits an estimates or annual review question. A member or edits an estimates or annual review question. A member may review question. A member may subsequently review question. A member may subsequently lodge review question. A member may subsequently lodge it review question. A member may subsequently lodge it as review question. A member may subsequently lodge it as a review question. A member may subsequently lodge it as a written subsequently lodge it as a written question subsequently lodge it as a written review subsequently lodge it as a written question instead. Mr subsequently lodge it as a written question instead. Mr Hipkins subsequently lodge it as a written question instead. Mr Hipkins was question instead. Mr Hipkins was concerned question instead. Mr Hipkins was question question instead. Mr Hipkins was concerned that Ministers question instead. Mr Hipkins was concerned that Ministers often concerned that Ministers often answer concerned that Ministers often answer written concerned that Ministers often answer written questions concerned that Ministers often answer written questions by answer written questions by reference answer written questions by reference to answer written questions by reference to materials answer written questions by reference to materials provided reference to materials provided during reference to materials provided during the reference to materials provided during the Estimates reference to materials provided during the Estimates and reference to materials provided during the Estimates and annual during the Estimates and annual review during the Estimates and annual review processes. during the Estimates and annual review processes. Ministers during the Estimates and annual review processes. Ministers have during the Estimates and annual review processes. Ministers have a review processes. Ministers have a responsibility review processes. Ministers have a responsibility to review processes. Ministers have a responsibility to the review processes. Ministers have a responsibility to the House review processes. Ministers have a responsibility to the House and responsibility to the House and through responsibility to the House and responsibility responsibility to the House and through the House responsibility to the House and through the House to responsibility to the House and through the House to the responsibility to the House and through the House to the country responsibility to the House and through the House to the country to through the House to the country to account through the House to the country to account for through the House to the country to account for the through the House to the country to account for the public through the House to the country to account for the public offices through the House to the country to account for the public offices they account for the public offices they hold. account for the public offices they hold. Questions account for the public offices they hold. Questions are account for the public offices they hold. Questions are an account for the public offices they hold. Questions are an important hold. Questions are an important element hold. Questions are an important element of hold. Questions are an important element of the hold. Questions are an important element of the accountability, hold. Questions are an important element of the accountability, and element of the accountability, and ministers element of the accountability, and ministers should element of the accountability, and ministers should provide element of the accountability, and ministers should provide informative ministers should provide informative answers ministers should provide informative answers to ministers should provide informative answers to them ministers should provide informative answers to them where ministers should provide informative answers to them where doing ministers should provide informative answers to them where doing so ministers should provide informative answers to them where doing so is answers to them where doing so is consistent answers to them where doing so is consistent with answers to them where doing so is consistent with the answers to them where doing so is consistent with the public answers to them where doing so is consistent with the public interest. consistent with the public interest. On consistent with the public interest. On 10 consistent with the public interest. On 10 September consistent with the public interest. On 10 September 2015 consistent with the public interest. On 10 September 2015 I consistent with the public interest. On 10 September 2015 I ruled consistent with the public interest. On 10 September 2015 I ruled that consistent with the public interest. On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a minister On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a minister may On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a minister may answer On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a minister may answer a On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a minister may answer a question On 10 September 2015 I ruled that a minister may answer a question by minister may answer a question by referring minister may answer a question by referring to minister may answer a question by referring to member minister may answer a question by referring to member to minister may answer a question by referring to member to information referring to member to information that referring to member to information that is referring to member to information that is already referring to member to information that is already publicly referring to member to information that is already publicly available. that is already publicly available. However, that is already publicly available. However, if that is already publicly available. However, if a that is already publicly available. However, if a minister that is already publicly available. However, if a minister chooses that is already publicly available. However, if a minister chooses to However, if a minister chooses to reply However, if a minister chooses to reply by However, if a minister chooses to reply by directing However, if a minister chooses to reply by directing a However, if a minister chooses to reply by directing a member However, if a minister chooses to reply by directing a member to reply by directing a member to information reply by directing a member to information already reply by directing a member to information already available, reply by directing a member to information already available, he reply by directing a member to information already available, he or information already available, he or she information already available, he or she must information already available, he or she must do information already available, he or she must do so information already available, he or she must do so with information already available, he or she must do so with some she must do so with some particularity. she must do so with some particularity. It she must do so with some particularity. It is she must do so with some particularity. It is not she must do so with some particularity. It is not acceptable particularity. It is not acceptable to particularity. It is not acceptable to simply particularity. It is not acceptable to simply sate particularity. It is not acceptable to simply sate that particularity. It is not acceptable to simply sate that the particularity. It is not acceptable to simply sate that the information to simply sate that the information -- to simply sate that the information -- state to simply sate that the information -- state that to simply sate that the information -- state that the to simply sate that the information -- state that the information to simply sate that the information -- state that the information has -- state that the information has already -- state that the information has already been -- state that the information has already been released, -- state that the information has already been released, or -- state that the information has already been released, or that -- state that the information has already been released, or that it already been released, or that it was already been released, or that it was provided already been released, or that it was provided to already been released, or that it was provided to a already been released, or that it was provided to a select already been released, or that it was provided to a select committee. was provided to a select committee. Rather, was provided to a select committee. Rather, the was provided to a select committee. Rather, the minister was provided to a select committee. Rather, the minister should was provided to a select committee. Rather, the minister should provide Rather, the minister should provide a Rather, the minister should provide a sufficiently Rather, the minister should provide a sufficiently detailed Rather, the minister should provide a sufficiently detailed answer Rather, the minister should provide a sufficiently detailed answer to a sufficiently detailed answer to enable a sufficiently detailed answer to enable the a sufficiently detailed answer to enable the member a sufficiently detailed answer to enable the member to a sufficiently detailed answer to enable the member to directly a sufficiently detailed answer to enable the member to directly locate enable the member to directly locate the enable the member to directly locate the information. enable the member to directly locate the information. Making enable the member to directly locate the information. Making reference enable the member to directly locate the information. Making reference to the information. Making reference to information the information. Making reference to information and the information. Making reference to information and answers the information. Making reference to information and answers to the information. Making reference to information and answers to Estimates information and answers to Estimates or information and answers to Estimates or annual information and answers to Estimates or annual review information and answers to Estimates or annual review questions information and answers to Estimates or annual review questions in or annual review questions in response or annual review questions in or or annual review questions in response to a or annual review questions in response to a written or annual review questions in response to a written question or annual review questions in response to a written question is response to a written question is acceptable, response to a written question is acceptable, only response to a written question is acceptable, only if response to a written question is acceptable, only if the response to a written question is acceptable, only if the information acceptable, only if the information actually acceptable, only if the information actually addresses acceptable, only if the information actually addresses the acceptable, only if the information actually addresses the question. actually addresses the question. Otherwise, actually addresses the question. Otherwise, the actually addresses the question. Otherwise, the minister actually addresses the question. Otherwise, the minister is actually addresses the question. Otherwise, the minister is expected Otherwise, the minister is expected to Otherwise, the minister is expected to provide Otherwise, the minister is expected to provide a Otherwise, the minister is expected to provide a full Otherwise, the minister is expected to provide a full and Otherwise, the minister is expected to provide a full and informative to provide a full and informative answer. to provide a full and informative answer. I to provide a full and informative answer. I would to provide a full and informative answer. I would conclude to provide a full and informative answer. I would conclude by to provide a full and informative answer. I would conclude by noting answer. I would conclude by noting that answer. I would conclude by noting that written answer. I would conclude by noting that written questions answer. I would conclude by noting that written questions usually answer. I would conclude by noting that written questions usually have that written questions usually have a that written questions usually have a shorter that written questions usually have a shorter time that written questions usually have a shorter time frame that written questions usually have a shorter time frame for that written questions usually have a shorter time frame for responses a shorter time frame for responses than a shorter time frame for responses than the a shorter time frame for responses than the Estimates a shorter time frame for responses than the Estimates or a shorter time frame for responses than the Estimates or annual a shorter time frame for responses than the Estimates or annual review than the Estimates or annual review questions, than the Estimates or annual review that than the Estimates or annual review questions, and that than the Estimates or annual review questions, and that same than the Estimates or annual review questions, and that same officials questions, and that same officials are questions, and that same officials are likely questions, and that same officials are likely to questions, and that same officials are likely to prepare questions, and that same officials are likely to prepare answers questions, and that same officials are likely to prepare answers to questions, and that same officials are likely to prepare answers to the are likely to prepare answers to the questions are likely to prepare answers to the questions however are likely to prepare answers to the questions however they are likely to prepare answers to the questions however they are are likely to prepare answers to the questions however they are lodged. questions however they are lodged. While questions however they are lodged. While it's questions however they are lodged. While it's largely questions however they are lodged. While it's largely up questions however they are lodged. While it's largely up to questions however they are lodged. While it's largely up to a questions however they are lodged. While it's largely up to a select While it's largely up to a select committee While it's largely up to a select committee to While it's largely up to a select committee to determine While it's largely up to a select committee to determine how While it's largely up to a select committee to determine how it committee to determine how it operates, committee to determine how it operates, I committee to determine how it operates, I urge committee to determine how it operates, I urge all committee to determine how it operates, I urge all select operates, I urge all select committees operates, I urge all select committees to operates, I urge all select committees to reach operates, I urge all select committees to reach negotiated committees to reach negotiated solutions committees to reach negotiated solutions on committees to reach negotiated solutions on the committees to reach negotiated solutions on the admissibility committees to reach negotiated solutions on the admissibility of solutions on the admissibility of questions, solutions on the admissibility of questions, particularly solutions on the admissibility of questions, particularly in solutions on the admissibility of questions, particularly in light solutions on the admissibility of questions, particularly in light of questions, particularly in light of their questions, particularly in light of their key questions, particularly in light of their key role questions, particularly in light of their key role in questions, particularly in light of their key role in scrutinising questions, particularly in light of their key role in scrutinising the their key role in scrutinising the executive. their key role in scrutinising the executive. I their key role in scrutinising the executive. I intend their key role in scrutinising the executive. I intend to their key role in scrutinising the executive. I intend to circulate their key role in scrutinising the executive. I intend to circulate a executive. I intend to circulate a copy executive. I intend to circulate a copy of executive. I intend to circulate a copy of this executive. I intend to circulate a copy of this ruling executive. I intend to circulate a copy of this ruling to executive. I intend to circulate a copy of this ruling to all copy of this ruling to all ministers. copy of this ruling to all ministers. Point copy of this ruling to all ministers. Point of copy of this ruling to all ministers. Point of order. copy of this ruling to all ministers. Point of order. Dr ministers. Point of order. Dr Kennedy ministers. Point of order. Dr Kennedy Graham, ministers. Point of order. Dr Kennedy Graham, point ministers. Point of order. Dr Kennedy Graham, point of ministers. Point of order. Dr Kennedy Graham, point of order. Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank Kennedy Graham, point of order. Kennedy Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank you. I Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank you. I seek Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank you. I seek leave Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank you. I seek leave to Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank you. I seek leave to move Kennedy Graham, point of order. Thank you. I seek leave to move a Thank you. I seek leave to move a motion Thank you. I seek leave to move a motion without Thank you. I seek leave to move a motion without notice Thank you. I seek leave to move a motion without notice or Thank you. I seek leave to move a motion without notice or debate Thank you. I seek leave to move a motion without notice or debate that motion without notice or debate that this motion without notice or debate that this House motion without notice or debate that this House note motion without notice or debate that this House note that motion without notice or debate that this House note that yesterday, motion without notice or debate that this House note that yesterday, 29 this House note that yesterday, 29 May, this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was the this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was the International this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day of this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day of UN May, was the International Day of UN Peacekeeping. May, was the International Day of UN Peacekeeping. Any May, was the International Day of UN Peacekeeping. Any objection May, was the International Day of UN Peacekeeping. Any objection to May, was the International Day of UN Peacekeeping. Any objection to that Peacekeeping. Any objection to that course Peacekeeping. Any objection to that course of Peacekeeping. Any objection to that course of action Peacekeeping. Any objection to that course of action being Peacekeeping. Any objection to that course of action being followed? course of action being followed? There course of action being followed? There is course of action being followed? There is none. course of action being followed? There is none. Dr course of action being followed? There is none. Dr Kennedy course of action being followed? There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. course of action being followed? There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I move There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I move that There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I move that this There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I move that this House There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I move that this House note There is none. Dr Kennedy Graham. I move that this House note that move that this House note that yesterday, move that this House note that yesterday, 29 move that this House note that yesterday, 29 May, move that this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was move that this House note that yesterday, 29 May, was the yesterday, 29 May, was the International yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day of yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day of UN yesterday, 29 May, was the International Day of UN Peacekeeping International Day of UN Peacekeeping and International Day of UN Peacekeeping and pay International Day of UN Peacekeeping and pay tribute International Day of UN Peacekeeping and pay tribute to International Day of UN Peacekeeping and pay tribute to more International Day of UN Peacekeeping and pay tribute to more than International Day of UN Peacekeeping and pay tribute to more than 113,000 and pay tribute to more than 113,000 piece and pay tribute to more than 113,000 piece keepers and pay tribute to more than 113,000 piece keepers deployed and pay tribute to more than 113,000 piece keepers deployed to and pay tribute to more than 113,000 piece keepers deployed to 16 piece keepers deployed to 16 missions piece keepers deployed to 16 missions around piece keepers deployed to 16 missions around the piece keepers deployed to 16 missions around the world, piece keepers deployed to 16 missions around the world, including missions around the world, including New missions around the world, including New Zealand missions around the world, including New Zealand armed missions around the world, including New Zealand armed forces, missions around the world, including New Zealand armed forces, personnel New Zealand armed forces, personnel and New Zealand armed forces, personnel and police, New Zealand armed forces, personnel and police, whose New Zealand armed forces, personnel and police, whose important New Zealand armed forces, personnel and police, whose important work and police, whose important work reflects and police, whose important work and and police, whose important work reflects the United and police, whose important work reflects the United Nations' reflects the United Nations' commitment reflects the United Nations' commitment to reflects the United Nations' commitment to save reflects the United Nations' commitment to save succeeding commitment to save succeeding generations commitment to save succeeding generations from commitment to save succeeding generations from the commitment to save succeeding generations from the scourge commitment to save succeeding generations from the scourge of commitment to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war. generations from the scourge of war. The generations from the scourge of war. The question generations from the scourge of war. The question is generations from the scourge of war. The question is that generations from the scourge of war. The question is that the generations from the scourge of war. The question is that the motion generations from the scourge of war. The question is that the motion be The question is that the motion be agreed The question is that the motion be agreed to. The question is that the motion be agreed to. Those The question is that the motion be agreed to. Those of The question is that the motion be agreed to. Those of that The question is that the motion be agreed to. Those of that opinion agreed to. Those of that opinion will agreed to. Those of that opinion will say agreed to. Those of that opinion will say aye. agreed to. Those of that opinion will say aye. To agreed to. Those of that opinion will say aye. To the agreed to. Those of that opinion will say aye. To the contrary agreed to. Those of that opinion will say aye. To the contrary no. will say aye. To the contrary no. The will say aye. To the contrary no. will will say aye. To the contrary no. The Ayes have will say aye. To the contrary no. The Ayes have it. will say aye. To the contrary no. The Ayes have it. The will say aye. To the contrary no. The Ayes have it. The House will say aye. To the contrary no. The Ayes have it. The House comes will say aye. To the contrary no. The Ayes have it. The House comes to The Ayes have it. The House comes to Oral The Ayes have it. The House comes to Oral Questions. The Ayes have it. The House comes to Oral Questions. Question The Ayes have it. The House comes to Oral Questions. Question No. The Ayes have it. The House comes to Oral Questions. Question No. 1. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister of My question is to the Minister of Finance: My question is to the Minister of Finance: How My question is to the Minister of Finance: How will My question is to the Minister of Finance: How will the My question is to the Minister of Finance: How will the Family My question is to the Minister of Finance: How will the Family Incomes Finance: How will the Family Incomes Package Finance: How will the Family Incomes Package in Finance: How will the Family Incomes Package in Budget Finance: How will the Family Incomes Package in Budget 2017 Finance: How will the Family Incomes Package in Budget 2017 help Finance: How will the Family Incomes Package in Budget 2017 help families Package in Budget 2017 help families get Package in Budget 2017 help families get ahead Package in Budget 2017 help families get ahead financially? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> The <INTERRUPTION> The $2 <INTERRUPTION> The $2 billion <INTERRUPTION> The $2 billion a <INTERRUPTION> The $2 billion a year <INTERRUPTION> The $2 billion a year Family <INTERRUPTION> The $2 billion a year Family Income The $2 billion a year Family Income Package The $2 billion a year Family Income Package in The $2 billion a year Family Income Package in Budget The $2 billion a year Family Income Package in Budget 2017 The $2 billion a year Family Income Package in Budget 2017 will The $2 billion a year Family Income Package in Budget 2017 will help Package in Budget 2017 will help families Package in Budget 2017 will help families get Package in Budget 2017 will help families get ahead Package in Budget 2017 will help families get ahead through Package in Budget 2017 will help families get ahead through a families get ahead through a combination families get ahead through a combination of families get ahead through a combination of tax families get ahead through a combination of tax threshold combination of tax threshold changes, combination of tax threshold changes, family combination of tax threshold changes, family tax combination of tax threshold changes, family tax credit changes, family tax credit increases, changes, family tax credit increases, and changes, family tax credit increases, and additional changes, family tax credit increases, and additional support increases, and additional support through increases, and additional support through the increases, and additional support through the accommodation through the accommodation supplement. through the accommodation supplement. The through the accommodation supplement. The tax through the accommodation supplement. The tax threshold supplement. The tax threshold changes supplement. The tax threshold changes mean supplement. The tax threshold changes mean anyone supplement. The tax threshold changes mean anyone earning supplement. The tax threshold changes mean anyone earning over changes mean anyone earning over $22,000 changes mean anyone earning over $22,000 receives changes mean anyone earning over $22,000 receives an changes mean anyone earning over $22,000 receives an additional changes mean anyone earning over $22,000 receives an additional $11 $22,000 receives an additional $11 per $22,000 receives an additional $11 per week, $22,000 receives an additional $11 per week, or $22,000 receives an additional $11 per week, or for $22,000 receives an additional $11 per week, or for those $22,000 receives an additional $11 per week, or for those earning $22,000 receives an additional $11 per week, or for those earning over per week, or for those earning over $52,000 per week, or for those earning over $52,000 $20 per week, or for those earning over $52,000 $20 per per week, or for those earning over $52,000 $20 per week per week, or for those earning over $52,000 $20 per week more. per week, or for those earning over $52,000 $20 per week more. When $52,000 $20 per week more. When combined $52,000 $20 per week more. When combined with $52,000 $20 per week more. When combined with the $52,000 $20 per week more. When combined with the increases $52,000 $20 per week more. When combined with the increases to $52,000 $20 per week more. When combined with the increases to the combined with the increases to the family combined with the increases to the family tax combined with the increases to the family tax credit, combined with the increases to the family tax credit, the combined with the increases to the family tax credit, the accommodation family tax credit, the accommodation supplement family tax credit, the accommodation family family tax credit, the accommodation supplement and the family tax credit, the accommodation supplement and the simplification family tax credit, the accommodation supplement and the simplification of supplement and the simplification of removing supplement and the simplification of removing the supplement and the simplification of removing the independent supplement and the simplification of removing the independent earner supplement and the simplification of removing the independent earner tax removing the independent earner tax credit, removing the independent earner tax removing removing the independent earner tax credit, $1. -- removing the independent earner tax credit, $1. -- 1.3 removing the independent earner tax credit, $1. -- 1.3 million removing the independent earner tax credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families removing credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are better off credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are better off by credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are better off by an credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are better off by an average credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are better off by an average of credit, $1. -- 1.3 million families are better off by an average of $26 are better off by an average of $26 per are better off by an average of $26 per week are better off by an average of $26 per week under are better off by an average of $26 per week under the are better off by an average of $26 per week under the changes are better off by an average of $26 per week under the changes coming per week under the changes coming into per week under the changes coming into effect per week under the changes coming into effect on per week under the changes coming into effect on 1 per week under the changes coming into effect on 1 April per week under the changes coming into effect on 1 April next per week under the changes coming into effect on 1 April next year. into effect on 1 April next year. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. What <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. What further Supplementary. What further assistance Supplementary. What further assistance is Supplementary. What further assistance is the Supplementary. What further assistance is the Government assistance is the Government providing assistance is the Government providing to assistance is the Government providing to assist assistance is the Government providing to assist families assistance is the Government providing to assist families with providing to assist families with their providing to assist families with their housing providing to assist families with their housing costs? providing to assist families with their housing costs? Increases providing to assist families with their housing costs? Increases to their housing costs? Increases to the their housing costs? Increases to the accommodation their housing costs? Increases to the accommodation supplement their housing costs? Increases to the accommodation supplement and the accommodation supplement and changes the accommodation supplement and changes to the accommodation supplement and changes to the the accommodation supplement and changes to the geographic the accommodation supplement and changes to the geographic areas the accommodation supplement and changes to the geographic areas that changes to the geographic areas that they changes to the geographic areas that they apply changes to the geographic areas that they apply to changes to the geographic areas that they apply to will changes to the geographic areas that they apply to will further changes to the geographic areas that they apply to will further assist they apply to will further assist families they apply to will further assist families to they apply to will further assist families to meet they apply to will further assist families to meet housing they apply to will further assist families to meet housing costs. families to meet housing costs. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> This <INTERRUPTION> This is <INTERRUPTION> This is a <INTERRUPTION> This is a very <INTERRUPTION> This is a very important <INTERRUPTION> This is a very important part <INTERRUPTION> This is a very important part of <INTERRUPTION> This is a very important part of the This is a very important part of the package, This is a very important part of the package, despite This is a very important part of the package, despite some This is a very important part of the package, despite some critics package, despite some critics attempt package, despite some critics <INTERRUPTION> package, despite some critics attempt to ignore package, despite some critics attempt to ignore it. package, despite some critics attempt to ignore it. For package, despite some critics attempt to ignore it. For example, package, despite some critics attempt to ignore it. For example, a attempt to ignore it. For example, a family attempt to ignore it. For example, a family living attempt to ignore it. For example, a family living with attempt to ignore it. For example, a family living with a attempt to ignore it. For example, a family living with a 16-year-old family living with a 16-year-old child family living with a 16-year-old child and family living with a 16-year-old child and one family living with a 16-year-old child and one partner family living with a 16-year-old child and one partner earning child and one partner earning $46,000 child and one partner earning $46,000 per child and one partner earning $46,000 per year child and one partner earning $46,000 per year will child and one partner earning $46,000 per year will be child and one partner earning $46,000 per year will be 36 child and one partner earning $46,000 per year will be 36 cents $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down per $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down per week, $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down per week, and $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down per week, and will $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down per week, and will benefit $46,000 per year will be 36 cents down per week, and will benefit by down per week, and will benefit by up down per week, and will benefit by up to down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 or down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 or more down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 or more per down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 or more per week down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 or more per week when down per week, and will benefit by up to $100 or more per week when you up to $100 or more per week when you take up to $100 or more per week when you take into up to $100 or more per week when you take into account up to $100 or more per week when you take into account the up to $100 or more per week when you take into account the whole up to $100 or more per week when you take into account the whole package. take into account the whole package. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Can <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Can I <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Can I just Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to members Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to members on Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to members on my Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to members on my left Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to members on my left - Supplementary. Order! Can I just mention to members on my left - I mention to members on my left - I need mention to members on my left - I need substantially mention to members on my left - I need substantially less mention to members on my left - I need substantially less interjection need substantially less interjection than need substantially less interjection than I'm need substantially less interjection than I'm getting need substantially less interjection than I'm getting at need substantially less interjection than I'm getting at this need substantially less interjection than I'm getting at this early than I'm getting at this early stage. than I'm getting at this early stage. Supplementary than I'm getting at this early stage. Supplementary question. than I'm getting at this early stage. Supplementary question. Thank stage. Supplementary question. Thank you. stage. Supplementary question. Thank you. How stage. Supplementary question. Thank you. How does stage. Supplementary question. Thank you. How does the stage. Supplementary question. Thank you. How does the Family stage. Supplementary question. Thank you. How does the Family Income you. How does the Family Income Package you. How does the Family Income Package benefit you. How does the Family Income Package benefit superannuants? you. How does the Family Income Package benefit superannuants? The Package benefit superannuants? The changes Package benefit superannuants? The Supplementary. Package benefit superannuants? The changes we're making Package benefit superannuants? The changes we're making to Package benefit superannuants? The changes we're making to the Package benefit superannuants? The changes we're making to the tax changes we're making to the tax system changes we're making to the tax system will changes we're making to the tax system will have changes we're making to the tax system will have flow-on changes we're making to the tax system will have flow-on benefits changes we're making to the tax system will have flow-on benefits to system will have flow-on benefits to around system will have flow-on benefits to Supplementary. system will have flow-on benefits to around three-quarters of system will have flow-on benefits to around three-quarters of a system will have flow-on benefits to around three-quarters of a million around three-quarters of a million New around three-quarters of a million New Zealand around three-quarters of a million New Zealand superannuation New Zealand superannuation recipients, New Zealand superannuation recipients, because New Zealand superannuation recipients, because of New Zealand superannuation recipients, because of the New Zealand superannuation recipients, because of the link recipients, because of the link between recipients, because of the link between aftertax recipients, because of the link between aftertax wages recipients, because of the link between aftertax wages and recipients, because of the link between aftertax wages and New between aftertax wages and New Zealand between aftertax wages and New Zealand super. between aftertax wages and New Zealand super. For between aftertax wages and New Zealand super. For a between aftertax wages and New Zealand super. For a married between aftertax wages and New Zealand super. For a married couple, Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ super Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ super will Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ super will increase Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ super will increase by Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ super will increase by $13 Zealand super. For a married couple, NZ super will increase by $13 per NZ super will increase by $13 per week NZ super will increase by $13 per week on NZ super will increase by $13 per week on 1 NZ super will increase by $13 per week on 1 April NZ super will increase by $13 per week on 1 April next NZ super will increase by $13 per week on 1 April next year NZ super will increase by $13 per week on 1 April next year because NZ super will increase by $13 per week on 1 April next year because of week on 1 April next year because of the week on 1 April next year because of the changes week on 1 April next year because of the changes on week on 1 April next year because of the changes on top week on 1 April next year because of the changes on top of week on 1 April next year because of the changes on top of their week on 1 April next year because of the changes on top of their normal the changes on top of their normal adjustment. the changes on top of their normal adjustment. This the changes on top of their normal adjustment. This will the changes on top of their normal adjustment. This will mean the changes on top of their normal adjustment. This will mean that adjustment. This will mean that there adjustment. This will mean that there will adjustment. This will mean that there will have adjustment. This will mean that there will have been adjustment. This will mean that there will have been a adjustment. This will mean that there will have been a 35% adjustment. This will mean that there will have been a 35% increase there will have been a 35% increase in there will have been a 35% increase in superannuation there will have been a 35% increase in superannuation since there will have been a 35% increase in superannuation since we there will have been a 35% increase in superannuation since we came there will have been a 35% increase in superannuation since we came into in superannuation since we came into office. in superannuation since we came into there in superannuation since we came into office. That is in superannuation since we came into office. That is over in superannuation since we came into office. That is over twice in superannuation since we came into office. That is over twice the in superannuation since we came into office. That is over twice the rate office. That is over twice the rate of office. That is over twice the rate of inflation. office. That is over twice the rate of inflation. In office. That is over twice the rate of inflation. In addition, office. That is over twice the rate of inflation. In addition, around of inflation. In addition, around 15,000 of inflation. In addition, around 15,000 superan of inflation. In addition, around 15,000 superan nunts of inflation. In addition, around 15,000 superan nunts with of inflation. In addition, around 15,000 superan nunts with -- 15,000 superan nunts with -- superannuants 15,000 superan nunts with -- superannuants with 15,000 superan nunts with -- superannuants with high 15,000 superan nunts with -- superannuants with high housing superannuants with high housing costs superannuants with high housing costs will superannuants with high housing costs will see superannuants with high housing costs will see an superannuants with high housing costs will see an increase superannuants with high housing costs will see an increase of superannuants with high housing costs will see an increase of $29 costs will see an increase of $29 per costs will see an increase of $29 costs costs will see an increase of $29 per week to costs will see an increase of $29 per week to help costs will see an increase of $29 per week to help them costs will see an increase of $29 per week to help them with costs will see an increase of $29 per week to help them with their per week to help them with their Housing per week to help them with their Housing costs. per week to help them with their Housing costs. Does per week to help them with their Housing costs. Does the per week to help them with their Housing costs. Does the package per week to help them with their Housing costs. Does the package in Housing costs. Does the package in combination Housing costs. Does the package in combination with Housing costs. Does the package in combination with the Housing costs. Does the package in combination with the tax Housing costs. Does the package in combination with the tax changes combination with the tax changes announced combination with the tax changes combination combination with the tax changes announced by him combination with the tax changes announced by him last combination with the tax changes announced by him last week, combination with the tax changes announced by him last week, as combination with the tax changes announced by him last week, as part announced by him last week, as part of announced by him last week, as part of this announced by him last week, as part of this Budget, announced by him last week, as part of this Budget, shift announced by him last week, as part of this Budget, shift more announced by him last week, as part of this Budget, shift more of announced by him last week, as part of this Budget, shift more of the of this Budget, shift more of the burden of this Budget, shift more of the burden of of this Budget, shift more of the burden of Government of this Budget, shift more of the burden of Government and of this Budget, shift more of the burden of Government and tax of this Budget, shift more of the burden of Government and tax on of this Budget, shift more of the burden of Government and tax on to burden of Government and tax on to higher burden of Government and tax on to higher income burden of Government and tax on to higher income earners? higher income earners? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Mr <INTERRUPTION> Mr Speaker, <INTERRUPTION> Mr Speaker, I <INTERRUPTION> Mr Speaker, I have <INTERRUPTION> Mr Speaker, I have seen <INTERRUPTION> Mr Speaker, I have seen an <INTERRUPTION> Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis that Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis that suggests Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis that suggests it's Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis that suggests it's a Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis that suggests it's a slightly Mr Speaker, I have seen an analysis that suggests it's a slightly higher that suggests it's a slightly higher incidence that suggests it's a slightly higher incidence at that suggests it's a slightly higher incidence at the that suggests it's a slightly higher incidence at the higher that suggests it's a slightly higher incidence at the higher end. incidence at the higher end. Supplementary. incidence at the higher end. Supplementary. What incidence at the higher end. Supplementary. What support incidence at the higher end. Supplementary. What support has incidence at the higher end. Supplementary. What support has he Supplementary. What support has he received Supplementary. What support has he received for Supplementary. What support has he received for Budget Supplementary. What support has he received for Budget 2017 Supplementary. What support has he received for Budget 2017 and Supplementary. What support has he received for Budget 2017 and the received for Budget 2017 and the Family received for Budget 2017 and the Family Income received for Budget 2017 and the Family Income Package? received for Budget 2017 and the Family Income Package? Budget received for Budget 2017 and the Family Income Package? Budget 2017 Family Income Package? Budget 2017 is Family Income Package? Budget 2017 Family Family Income Package? Budget 2017 is receiving a Family Income Package? Budget 2017 is receiving a wide Family Income Package? Budget 2017 is receiving a wide range Family Income Package? Budget 2017 is receiving a wide range of Family Income Package? Budget 2017 is receiving a wide range of support is receiving a wide range of support from is receiving a wide range of support from around is receiving a wide range of support from around the is receiving a wide range of support from around the country. is receiving a wide range of support from around the country. I is receiving a wide range of support from around the country. I was from around the country. I was pleased from around the country. I was pleased to from around the country. I was pleased to hear from around the country. I was pleased to hear the from around the country. I was pleased to hear the comments from around the country. I was pleased to hear the comments from pleased to hear the comments from young pleased to hear the comments from young families pleased to hear the comments from young families on pleased to hear the comments from young families on TV pleased to hear the comments from young families on TV and pleased to hear the comments from young families on TV and in pleased to hear the comments from young families on TV and in the young families on TV and in the newspapers young families on TV and in the newspapers about young families on TV and in the newspapers about how young families on TV and in the newspapers about how getting young families on TV and in the newspapers about how getting some newspapers about how getting some extra newspapers about how getting some newspapers newspapers about how getting some extra money every newspapers about how getting some extra money every week newspapers about how getting some extra money every week will newspapers about how getting some extra money every week will make extra money every week will make their extra money every week will make their lives extra money every week will make their lives easier. extra money every week will make their lives easier. I'm extra money every week will make their lives easier. I'm also extra money every week will make their lives easier. I'm also very their lives easier. I'm also very pleased their lives easier. I'm also very pleased to their lives easier. I'm also very pleased to see their lives easier. I'm also very pleased to see colleagues their lives easier. I'm also very pleased to see colleagues across their lives easier. I'm also very pleased to see colleagues across the pleased to see colleagues across the House, pleased to see colleagues across the House, including pleased to see colleagues across the House, including the pleased to see colleagues across the House, including the Greens pleased to see colleagues across the House, including the Greens and pleased to see colleagues across the House, including the Greens and New House, including the Greens and New Zealand House, including the Greens and New Zealand First, House, including the Greens and New Zealand First, understand House, including the Greens and New Zealand First, understand this Zealand First, understand this package Zealand First, understand this package is Zealand First, understand this package is about Zealand First, understand this package is about helping Zealand First, understand this package is about helping families package is about helping families get package is about helping families get ahead package is about helping families get ahead and package is about helping families get ahead and they package is about helping families get ahead and they voted package is about helping families get ahead and they voted in package is about helping families get ahead and they voted in favour get ahead and they voted in favour last get ahead and they voted in favour get get ahead and they voted in favour last Friday and get ahead and they voted in favour last Friday and I get ahead and they voted in favour last Friday and I would get ahead and they voted in favour last Friday and I would like get ahead and they voted in favour last Friday and I would like to last Friday and I would like to thank last Friday and I would like to thank them last Friday and I would like to thank them for last Friday and I would like to thank them for their last Friday and I would like to thank them for their support. thank them for their support. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! Supplementary. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Supplementary. How <INTERRUPTION> Order! Supplementary. How does <INTERRUPTION> Order! Supplementary. How does this Order! Supplementary. How does this expansion Order! Supplementary. How does this expansion of Order! Supplementary. How does this expansion of the Order! Supplementary. How does this expansion of the working Order! Supplementary. How does this expansion of the working for expansion of the working for families expansion of the working for families policy expansion of the working for families policy gel expansion of the working for families policy gel with expansion of the working for families policy gel with John expansion of the working for families policy gel with John Key's families policy gel with John Key's comments families policy gel with John Key's comments that families policy gel with John Key's comments that working families policy gel with John Key's comments that working for families policy gel with John Key's comments that working for families comments that working for families is comments that working for families is "communism comments that working for families is "communism by comments that working for families is "communism by stealth"? is "communism by stealth"? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Well, <INTERRUPTION> Well, the <INTERRUPTION> Well, the member's <INTERRUPTION> Well, the member's quite <INTERRUPTION> Well, the member's quite young, <INTERRUPTION> Well, the member's quite young, but Well, the member's quite young, but some Well, the member's quite young, but some of Well, the member's quite young, but some of us Well, the member's quite young, but some of us older Well, the member's quite young, but some of us older ones... some of us older ones... <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> We <INTERRUPTION> We are <INTERRUPTION> We are able <INTERRUPTION> We are able to <INTERRUPTION> We are able to remember <INTERRUPTION> We are able to remember that <INTERRUPTION> We are able to remember that we've We are able to remember that we've had We are able to remember that we've had family We are able to remember that we've had family benefits We are able to remember that we've had family benefits and We are able to remember that we've had family benefits and other had family benefits and other packages had family benefits and other packages for had family benefits and other packages for families had family benefits and other packages for families in had family benefits and other packages for families in place had family benefits and other packages for families in place in packages for families in place in this packages for families in place in this country packages for families in place in this country since packages for families in place in this country since at packages for families in place in this country since at least packages for families in place in this country since at least back this country since at least back through this country since at least back had this country since at least back through to the this country since at least back through to the '70s. this country since at least back through to the '70s. In this country since at least back through to the '70s. In fact, this country since at least back through to the '70s. In fact, I this country since at least back through to the '70s. In fact, I can through to the '70s. In fact, I can remember through to the '70s. In fact, I can remember my through to the '70s. In fact, I can remember my parents through to the '70s. In fact, I can remember my parents getting through to the '70s. In fact, I can remember my parents getting the remember my parents getting the family remember my parents getting the family benefit. remember my parents getting the family benefit. So, remember my parents getting the family benefit. So, there remember my parents getting the family benefit. So, there has remember my parents getting the family benefit. So, there has always family benefit. So, there has always been family benefit. So, there has always been some family benefit. So, there has always been some form family benefit. So, there has always been some form of family benefit. So, there has always been some form of assistance family benefit. So, there has always been some form of assistance to been some form of assistance to people been some form of assistance to people with been some form of assistance to people with young been some form of assistance to people with young families. been some form of assistance to people with young families. And been some form of assistance to people with young families. And this people with young families. And this is people with young families. And this is one people with young families. And this is one example people with young families. And this is one example of people with young families. And this is one example of it people with young families. And this is one example of it existing people with young families. And this is one example of it existing today, is one example of it existing today, in is one example of it existing today, in terms is one example of it existing today, in terms of is one example of it existing today, in terms of the is one example of it existing today, in terms of the family is one example of it existing today, in terms of the family tax is one example of it existing today, in terms of the family tax credits, in terms of the family tax credits, and in terms of the family tax credits, and it in terms of the family tax credits, and it is in terms of the family tax credits, and it is the in terms of the family tax credits, and it is the most in terms of the family tax credits, and it is the most efficient in terms of the family tax credits, and it is the most efficient way in terms of the family tax credits, and it is the most efficient way of and it is the most efficient way of supplying and it is the most efficient way of supplying extra and it is the most efficient way of supplying extra support and it is the most efficient way of supplying extra support to supplying extra support to low-income supplying extra support to low-income parents supplying extra support to low-income parents with supplying extra support to low-income parents with young low-income parents with young children. low-income parents with young children. <INTERRUPTION> children. <INTERRUPTION> . children. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary children. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary question. children. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary question. I children. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary question. I ask children. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary question. I ask the . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister of . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister of Finance . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister of Finance as . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister of Finance as to . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister of Finance as to whether . Supplementary question. I ask the Minister of Finance as to whether he Minister of Finance as to whether he has Minister of Finance as to whether he has any Minister of Finance as to whether he has any confidence Minister of Finance as to whether he has any confidence of Minister of Finance as to whether he has any confidence of his Minister of Finance as to whether he has any confidence of his Budget has any confidence of his Budget being has any confidence of his Budget being passed has any confidence of his Budget being passed seeing has any confidence of his Budget being passed seeing as has any confidence of his Budget being passed seeing as we has any confidence of his Budget being passed seeing as we have has any confidence of his Budget being passed seeing as we have just being passed seeing as we have just a being passed seeing as we have just a line being passed seeing as we have just a line of being passed seeing as we have just a line of anger being passed seeing as we have just a line of anger in being passed seeing as we have just a line of anger in the being passed seeing as we have just a line of anger in the form being passed seeing as we have just a line of anger in the form of being passed seeing as we have just a line of anger in the form of the a line of anger in the form of the ACT a line of anger in the form of the ACT Party a line of anger in the form of the ACT Party member a line of anger in the form of the ACT Party member asking a line of anger in the form of the ACT Party member asking questions ACT Party member asking questions every ACT Party member asking questions every day ACT Party member asking questions every day challenges ACT Party member asking questions every day challenges its ACT Party member asking questions every day challenges its veracity every day challenges its veracity and every day challenges its veracity and its every day challenges its veracity and its economic every day challenges its veracity and its economic thinking? every day challenges its veracity and its economic thinking? The every day challenges its veracity and its economic thinking? The first and its economic thinking? The first part and its economic thinking? The first part of and its economic thinking? The first part of the and its economic thinking? The first part of the question and its economic thinking? The first part of the question is and its economic thinking? The first part of the question is in and its economic thinking? The first part of the question is in order. part of the question is in order. Well, part of the question is in order. Well, weirdly part of the question is in order. Well, weirdly it part of the question is in order. Well, weirdly it is part of the question is in order. Well, weirdly it is a part of the question is in order. Well, weirdly it is a strange part of the question is in order. Well, weirdly it is a strange day Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, but Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, but I Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, but I would Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, but I would like Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, but I would like to Well, weirdly it is a strange day indeed, but I would like to thank indeed, but I would like to thank the indeed, but I would like to thank the member indeed, but I would like to thank the member for indeed, but I would like to thank the member for his indeed, but I would like to thank the member for his saw indeed, but I would like to thank the member for his saw port, indeed, but I would like to thank the member for his saw port, which the member for his saw port, which is the member for his saw port, which is ensuring the member for his saw port, which is ensuring we've the member for his saw port, which is ensuring we've got the member for his saw port, which is ensuring we've got some the member for his saw port, which is ensuring we've got some votes the member for his saw port, which is ensuring we've got some votes to is ensuring we've got some votes to spare is ensuring we've got some votes to spare in is ensuring we've got some votes to spare in passing is ensuring we've got some votes to spare in passing the is ensuring we've got some votes to spare in passing the Family is ensuring we've got some votes to spare in passing the Family Income spare in passing the Family Income Package. spare in passing the Family Income Package. <INTERRUPTION> Package. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Package. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. If Package. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. If the Package. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. If the Minister Package. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. If the Minister will Supplementary. If the Minister will indullable Supplementary. If the Minister will indullable my Supplementary. If the Minister will indullable my -- Supplementary. If the Minister will indullable my -- ill Supplementary. If the Minister will indullable my -- ill dulln't Supplementary. If the Minister will indullable my -- ill dulln't my indullable my -- ill dulln't my youthful indullable my -- ill dulln't my youthful lack indullable my -- ill dulln't my youthful lack of indullable my -- ill dulln't my youthful lack of historical youthful lack of historical knowledge, youthful lack of historical Supplementary. youthful lack of historical knowledge, could he youthful lack of historical knowledge, could he please youthful lack of historical knowledge, could he please tell youthful lack of historical knowledge, could he please tell me knowledge, could he please tell me how knowledge, could he please tell me how long knowledge, could he please tell me how long has knowledge, could he please tell me how long has it knowledge, could he please tell me how long has it been knowledge, could he please tell me how long has it been the knowledge, could he please tell me how long has it been the National how long has it been the National Party how long has it been the National Party that is how long has it been the National Party that is tasked how long has it been the National Party that is tasked with how long has it been the National Party that is tasked with expanding Party that is tasked with expanding taxes Party that is tasked with expanding taxes and Party that is tasked with expanding taxes and transfers Party that is tasked with expanding taxes and transfers and Party that is tasked with expanding taxes and transfers and the Party that is tasked with expanding taxes and transfers and the welfare taxes and transfers and the welfare state? taxes and transfers and the welfare how taxes and transfers and the welfare state? Order! There taxes and transfers and the welfare state? Order! There is taxes and transfers and the welfare state? Order! There is no state? Order! There is no responsibility state? Order! There is no responsibility for state? Order! There is no responsibility for the state? Order! There is no responsibility for the National responsibility for the National Party responsibility for the National Party by responsibility for the National Party by the responsibility for the National Party by the Minister. Party by the Minister. <INTERRUPTION> My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Prime My question is to the Prime Minister: My question is to the Prime Minister: Did My question is to the Prime Minister: Did the My question is to the Prime Minister: Did the Minister My question is to the Prime Minister: Did the Minister of Minister: Did the Minister of Finance Minister: Did the Minister of Finance tell Minister: Did the Minister of Finance tell him Minister: Did the Minister of Finance tell him that Minister: Did the Minister of Finance tell him that last Minister: Did the Minister of Finance tell him that last week's Finance tell him that last week's Budget Finance tell him that last week's Budget cut Finance tell him that last week's Budget cut elective Finance tell him that last week's Budget cut elective surgery Finance tell him that last week's Budget cut elective surgery funding Budget cut elective surgery funding by Budget cut elective surgery funding by $10 Budget cut elective surgery funding by $10 million, Budget cut elective surgery funding by $10 million, means Budget cut elective surgery funding by $10 million, means the Budget cut elective surgery funding by $10 million, means the average by $10 million, means the average early by $10 million, means the average early childhood by $10 million, means the average early childhood centre by $10 million, means the average early childhood centre effectively early childhood centre effectively loses early childhood centre effectively loses $15,000, early childhood centre effectively loses $15,000, and early childhood centre effectively loses $15,000, and provides early childhood centre effectively loses $15,000, and provides new loses $15,000, and provides new Crown loses $15,000, and provides new Crown land loses $15,000, and provides new Crown land funding loses $15,000, and provides new Crown land funding for loses $15,000, and provides new Crown land funding for only loses $15,000, and provides new Crown land funding for only 1,200 Crown land funding for only 1,200 houses? No, No, the No, the Minister No, the Minister of No, the Minister of Finance No, the Minister of Finance did No, the Minister of Finance did not, No, the Minister of Finance did not, because No, the Minister of Finance did not, because it's No, the Minister of Finance did not, because it's not No, the Minister of Finance did not, because it's not correct. because it's not correct. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Not <INTERRUPTION> Not correct! <INTERRUPTION> Not correct! Now <INTERRUPTION> Not correct! Now that <INTERRUPTION> Not correct! Now that the <INTERRUPTION> Not correct! Now that the Labour Not correct! Now that the Labour Party Not correct! Now that the Labour Party has Not correct! Now that the Labour Party has voted Not correct! Now that the Labour Party has voted against Not correct! Now that the Labour Party has voted against the Not correct! Now that the Labour Party has voted against the Budget, Party has voted against the Budget, it Party has voted against the Budget, <INTERRUPTION> Party has voted against the Budget, it is trying Party has voted against the Budget, it is trying to Party has voted against the Budget, it is trying to find Party has voted against the Budget, it is trying to find reasons Party has voted against the Budget, it is trying to find reasons to it is trying to find reasons to justify it is trying to find reasons to justify that it is trying to find reasons to justify that vote, it is trying to find reasons to justify that vote, but it is trying to find reasons to justify that vote, but I it is trying to find reasons to justify that vote, but I would it is trying to find reasons to justify that vote, but I would say justify that vote, but I would say to justify that vote, but I would say to the justify that vote, but I would say to the member justify that vote, but I would say to the member he justify that vote, but I would say to the member he should justify that vote, but I would say to the member he should stop justify that vote, but I would say to the member he should stop relying to the member he should stop relying on to the member he should stop relying on Grant to the member he should stop relying on Grant Robert to the member he should stop relying on Grant Robert -- to the member he should stop relying on Grant Robert -- Grant to the member he should stop relying on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's numbers. on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's numbers. Dr on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's numbers. Dr Tim on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President on Grant Robert -- Grant Robertson's numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of GPs numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of GPs - numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of GPs - is numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of GPs - is he numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of GPs - is he right numbers. Dr Tim Malloy, President of the College of GPs - is he right or the College of GPs - is he right or wrong the College of GPs - is he right or wrong when the College of GPs - is he right or wrong when he the College of GPs - is he right or wrong when he says the College of GPs - is he right or wrong when he says of the College of GPs - is he right or wrong when he says of this the College of GPs - is he right or wrong when he says of this Budget, wrong when he says of this Budget, "There wrong when he says of this Budget, "There is wrong when he says of this Budget, "There is nothing wrong when he says of this Budget, "There is nothing in wrong when he says of this Budget, "There is nothing in it. wrong when he says of this Budget, "There is nothing in it. I'm wrong when he says of this Budget, "There is nothing in it. I'm not "There is nothing in it. I'm not surprised. "There is nothing in it. I'm not surprised. I'm "There is nothing in it. I'm not surprised. I'm disappointed "There is nothing in it. I'm not surprised. I'm disappointed and surprised. I'm disappointed and seriously surprised. I'm disappointed and seriously underwhelmingmented", surprised. I'm disappointed and seriously underwhelmingmented", and seriously underwhelmingmented", and tax seriously underwhelmingmented", and tax cuts seriously underwhelmingmented", and tax cuts will seriously underwhelmingmented", and tax cuts will be seriously underwhelmingmented", and tax cuts will be "completely seriously underwhelmingmented", and tax cuts will be "completely negated tax cuts will be "completely negated in tax cuts will be "completely negated in the tax cuts will be "completely negated in the cost tax cuts will be "completely negated in the cost of tax cuts will be "completely negated in the cost of healthcare tax cuts will be "completely negated in the cost of healthcare goes tax cuts will be "completely negated in the cost of healthcare goes up"? in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm sure in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm sure that in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm sure that Dr in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm sure that Dr Malloy, in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if in the cost of healthcare goes up"? I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he considered I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he considered all I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he considered all aspects I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he considered all aspects of I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he considered all aspects of the I'm sure that Dr Malloy, if he considered all aspects of the lives considered all aspects of the lives of considered all aspects of the lives of his considered all aspects of the lives of his patients, considered all aspects of the lives of his patients, would considered all aspects of the lives of his patients, would actually of his patients, would actually disagree of his patients, would actually disagree with of his patients, would actually disagree with himself, of his patients, would actually disagree with himself, because of his patients, would actually disagree with himself, because the disagree with himself, because the fact disagree with himself, because the fact is disagree with himself, because the fact is that disagree with himself, because the fact is that a disagree with himself, because the fact is that a whole disagree with himself, because the fact is that a whole lot disagree with himself, because the fact is that a whole lot of disagree with himself, because the fact is that a whole lot of those... fact is that a whole lot of those... <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> A <INTERRUPTION> A whole <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of his <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of his patients... A whole lot of his patients... <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> A <INTERRUPTION> A whole <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of his <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of his patients <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of his patients will <INTERRUPTION> A whole lot of his patients will be A whole lot of his patients will be considerably A whole lot of his patients will be considerably better A whole lot of his patients will be considerably better off A whole lot of his patients will be considerably better off because A whole lot of his patients will be considerably better off because of considerably better off because of the considerably better off because of the Family considerably better off because of the Family Income considerably better off because of the Family Income Package, considerably better off because of the Family Income Package, and considerably better off because of the Family Income Package, and those the Family Income Package, and those with the Family Income Package, and those with more the Family Income Package, and those with more complex the Family Income Package, and those with more complex requirements with more complex requirements including with more complex requirements including the with more complex requirements including the need with more complex requirements including the need for with more complex requirements including the need for health including the need for health services including the need for health services will including the need for health services will find including the need for health services will find that including the need for health services will find that a including the need for health services will find that a range including the need for health services will find that a range of services will find that a range of initiatives services will find that a range of initiatives from services will find that a range of initiatives from the services will find that a range of initiatives from the increase services will find that a range of initiatives from the increase in initiatives from the increase in spending initiatives from the increase in spending for initiatives from the increase in spending for health initiatives from the increase in spending for health through initiatives from the increase in spending for health through to initiatives from the increase in spending for health through to the spending for health through to the social spending for health through to the social investment spending for health through to the social investment initiatives spending for health through to the social investment initiatives will social investment initiatives will aid social investment initiatives will aid his social investment initiatives will aid his patients. social investment initiatives will aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, I'm aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, I'm sure aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, I'm sure that aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, I'm sure that Dr aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy aid his patients. <INTERRUPTION> So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy would So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy would figure So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy would figure out So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy would figure out he's So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy would figure out he's not So, I'm sure that Dr Malloy would figure out he's not correct. figure out he's not correct. Supplementary. figure out he's not correct. Supplementary. Why figure out he's not correct. Supplementary. Why does figure out he's not correct. Supplementary. Why does he figure out he's not correct. Supplementary. Why does he have figure out he's not correct. Supplementary. Why does he have to Supplementary. Why does he have to say Supplementary. Why does he have to say to Supplementary. Why does he have to say to the Supplementary. Why does he have to say to the people Supplementary. Why does he have to say to the people who Supplementary. Why does he have to say to the people who won't Supplementary. Why does he have to say to the people who won't be Supplementary. Why does he have to say to the people who won't be able say to the people who won't be able to say to the people who won't be able to get say to the people who won't be able to get surgeries say to the people who won't be able to get surgeries or say to the people who won't be able to get surgeries or home say to the people who won't be able to get surgeries or home support to get surgeries or home support services to get surgeries or home support services as to get surgeries or home support services as a to get surgeries or home support services as a result to get surgeries or home support services as a result of to get surgeries or home support services as a result of his services as a result of his Government services as a result of his Government underfunding services as a result of his Government underfunding DHBs services as a result of his Government underfunding DHBs by services as a result of his Government underfunding DHBs by over Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 million Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 million a Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 million a year Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 million a year in Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 million a year in the Government underfunding DHBs by over $200 million a year in the Budget? $200 million a year in the Budget? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Well, <INTERRUPTION> Well, what <INTERRUPTION> Well, what I <INTERRUPTION> Well, what I would <INTERRUPTION> Well, what I would say <INTERRUPTION> Well, what I would say to <INTERRUPTION> Well, what I would say to them <INTERRUPTION> Well, what I would say to them is Well, what I would say to them is that Well, what I would say to them is that the Well, what I would say to them is that the health Well, what I would say to them is that the health services Well, what I would say to them is that the health services have Well, what I would say to them is that the health services have had Well, what I would say to them is that the health services have had a that the health services have had a very that the health services have had a very large that the health services have had a very large amount that the health services have had a very large amount of that the health services have had a very large amount of extra that the health services have had a very large amount of extra money very large amount of extra money over very large amount of extra money over the very large amount of extra money over the next very large amount of extra money over the next few very large amount of extra money over the next few years. over the next few years. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> And <INTERRUPTION> And that <INTERRUPTION> And that will <INTERRUPTION> And that will be <INTERRUPTION> And that will be allocated <INTERRUPTION> And that will be allocated by <INTERRUPTION> And that will be allocated by the And that will be allocated by the DHBs, And that will be allocated by the DHBs, where And that will be allocated by the DHBs, where they And that will be allocated by the DHBs, where they believe And that will be allocated by the DHBs, where they believe the And that will be allocated by the DHBs, where they believe the need And that will be allocated by the DHBs, where they believe the need is DHBs, where they believe the need is greatest. DHBs, where they believe the need is greatest. <INTERRUPTION> greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would also greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would also say greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would also say to greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would also say to them greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would also say to them that greatest. <INTERRUPTION> I would also say to them that they I would also say to them that they shouldn't I would also say to them that they shouldn't take I would also say to them that they shouldn't take too I would also say to them that they shouldn't take too much I would also say to them that they shouldn't take too much notice I would also say to them that they shouldn't take too much notice of shouldn't take too much notice of the shouldn't take too much notice of the Labour shouldn't take too much notice of the Labour Party's shouldn't take too much notice of the Labour Party's theoretical the Labour Party's theoretical calculations the Labour Party's theoretical DHBs, the Labour Party's theoretical calculations about what the Labour Party's theoretical calculations about what - the Labour Party's theoretical calculations about what - about the Labour Party's theoretical calculations about what - about the calculations about what - about the amount calculations about what - about the amount of calculations about what - about the amount of money, calculations about what - about the amount of money, because calculations about what - about the amount of money, because what amount of money, because what matters amount of money, because what matters is amount of money, because what matters is results, amount of money, because what matters is results, and amount of money, because what matters is results, and this matters is results, and this Government matters is results, and this Government will matters is results, and this Government will remain matters is results, and this Government will remain strongly Government will remain strongly focused Government will remain strongly focused on Government will remain strongly focused on getting Government will remain strongly focused on getting better Government will remain strongly focused on getting better results Government will remain strongly focused on getting better results in focused on getting better results in healthcare. focused on getting better results in healthcare. Did focused on getting better results in healthcare. Did the focused on getting better results in healthcare. Did the Minister focused on getting better results in healthcare. Did the Minister of healthcare. Did the Minister of Finance healthcare. Did the Minister of healthcare. healthcare. Did the Minister of Finance tell him healthcare. Did the Minister of Finance tell him that healthcare. Did the Minister of Finance tell him that last healthcare. Did the Minister of Finance tell him that last week's Finance tell him that last week's Budget Finance tell him that last week's Budget will Finance tell him that last week's Budget will increase Finance tell him that last week's Budget will increase the Finance tell him that last week's Budget will increase the incomes Finance tell him that last week's Budget will increase the incomes of Budget will increase the incomes of 1.3 Budget will increase the incomes of 1.3 million Budget will increase the incomes of 1.3 million families Budget will increase the incomes of 1.3 million families by Budget will increase the incomes of 1.3 million families by an Budget will increase the incomes of 1.3 million families by an average 1.3 million families by an average of 1.3 million families by an average of $26 1.3 million families by an average of $26 per 1.3 million families by an average of $26 per week? 1.3 million families by an average of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he did. of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he did. And of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he did. And he of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he did. And he told of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he did. And he told me of $26 per week? <INTERRUPTION> Yes, he did. And he told me that Yes, he did. And he told me that $156 Yes, he did. And he told me that $156 -- Yes, he did. And he told me that $156 -- 156,000 Yes, he did. And he told me that $156 -- 156,000 of Yes, he did. And he told me that $156 -- 156,000 of the Yes, he did. And he told me that $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families will $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families will gain $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families will gain by $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families will gain by an $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families will gain by an average $156 -- 156,000 of the poorest families will gain by an average of families will gain by an average of $35 families will gain by an average of $35 per families will gain by an average of $35 per week, families will gain by an average of $35 per week, and families will gain by an average of $35 per week, and he families will gain by an average of $35 per week, and he told families will gain by an average of $35 per week, and he told me families will gain by an average of $35 per week, and he told me that $35 per week, and he told me that 750,000 $35 per week, and he told me that 750,000 superannuants $35 per week, and he told me that 750,000 superannuants will $35 per week, and he told me that 750,000 superannuants will also $35 per week, and he told me that 750,000 superannuants will also gain 750,000 superannuants will also gain with 750,000 superannuants will also gain 750,000 750,000 superannuants will also gain with the couple 750,000 superannuants will also gain with the couple of 750,000 superannuants will also gain with the couple of rate 750,000 superannuants will also gain with the couple of rate of 750,000 superannuants will also gain with the couple of rate of New with the couple of rate of New Zealand with the couple of rate of New Zealand super with the couple of rate of New Zealand super expected with the couple of rate of New Zealand super expected to with the couple of rate of New Zealand super expected to increase Zealand super expected to increase by Zealand super expected to increase by around Zealand super expected to increase by around $22 Zealand super expected to increase by around $22 per Zealand super expected to increase by around $22 per week Zealand super expected to increase by around $22 per week from Zealand super expected to increase by around $22 per week from 1 Zealand super expected to increase by around $22 per week from 1 April by around $22 per week from 1 April next by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. But by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. But he by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. But he has by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. But he has fallen by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. But he has fallen down by around $22 per week from 1 April next year. But he has fallen down on next year. But he has fallen down on one next year. But he has fallen down on one task next year. But he has fallen down on one task - next year. But he has fallen down on one task - and next year. But he has fallen down on one task - and that next year. But he has fallen down on one task - and that is next year. But he has fallen down on one task - and that is properly one task - and that is properly explaining one task - and that is properly explaining to one task - and that is properly explaining to the one task - and that is properly explaining to the leader one task - and that is properly explaining to the leader of one task - and that is properly explaining to the leader of the explaining to the leader of the Labour explaining to the leader of the one explaining to the leader of the Labour Party and explaining to the leader of the Labour Party and the explaining to the leader of the Labour Party and the finance Labour Party and the finance spokesman Labour Party and the finance spokesman of Labour Party and the finance spokesman of the Labour Party and the finance spokesman of the Labour Labour Party and the finance spokesman of the Labour Party Labour Party and the finance spokesman of the Labour Party that spokesman of the Labour Party that when spokesman of the Labour Party that when they spokesman of the Labour Party that when they use spokesman of the Labour Party that when they use case spokesman of the Labour Party that when they use case studies, spokesman of the Labour Party that when they use case studies, they when they use case studies, they should when they use case studies, they should take when they use case studies, they should take into when they use case studies, they should take into account when they use case studies, they should take into account all when they use case studies, they should take into account all the should take into account all the measures should take into account all the measures the should take into account all the measures the Government should take into account all the measures the Government has should take into account all the measures the Government has put should take into account all the measures the Government has put in measures the Government has put in place, measures the Government has put in place, and measures the Government has put in place, and not measures the Government has put in place, and not just measures the Government has put in place, and not just picked measures the Government has put in place, and not just picked one measures the Government has put in place, and not just picked one or place, and not just picked one or two. place, and not just picked one or two. <INTERRUPTION> two. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. two. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! two. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Why two. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Why when two. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Why when - two. <INTERRUPTION> Supplementary. Order! Why when - in Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 - Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 - he Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 - he and Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 - he and his Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 - he and his Government Supplementary. Order! Why when - in 2010 - he and his Government cut 2010 - he and his Government cut more 2010 - he and his Government cut more than 2010 - he and his Government cut more than $700 2010 - he and his Government cut more than $700 million 2010 - he and his Government cut more than $700 million out 2010 - he and his Government cut more than $700 million out of more than $700 million out of working more than $700 million out of working for more than $700 million out of working for families more than $700 million out of working for families have more than $700 million out of working for families have they more than $700 million out of working for families have they only working for families have they only restored working for families have they only restored last working for families have they only restored last week working for families have they only restored last week $370 working for families have they only restored last week $370 million working for families have they only restored last week $370 million a restored last week $370 million a year restored last week $370 million a year to restored last week $370 million a year to working restored last week $370 million a year to working for restored last week $370 million a year to working for families? restored last week $370 million a year to working for families? Why restored last week $370 million a year to working for families? Why is year to working for families? Why is he year to working for families? Why is he continuing year to working for families? Why is he continuing to year to working for families? Why is he continuing to rip year to working for families? Why is he continuing to rip working he continuing to rip working families he continuing to rip working families in he continuing to rip working families in New he continuing to rip working families in New Zealand he continuing to rip working families in New Zealand off? families in New Zealand off? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Well, <INTERRUPTION> Well, the <INTERRUPTION> Well, the Labour <INTERRUPTION> Well, the Labour Party's <INTERRUPTION> Well, the Labour Party's getting <INTERRUPTION> Well, the Labour Party's getting so Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate it Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate it is Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate it is now Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate it is now defining Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate it is now defining a Well, the Labour Party's getting so desperate it is now defining a cut desperate it is now defining a cut as desperate it is now defining a cut as a desperate it is now defining a cut as a smaller desperate it is now defining a cut as a smaller amount desperate it is now defining a cut as a smaller amount of desperate it is now defining a cut as a smaller amount of money desperate it is now defining a cut as a smaller amount of money - desperate it is now defining a cut as a smaller amount of money - a as a smaller amount of money - a smaller as a smaller amount of money - a smaller increase as a smaller amount of money - a smaller increase than as a smaller amount of money - a smaller increase than the as a smaller amount of money - a smaller increase than the bigger as a smaller amount of money - a smaller increase than the bigger one smaller increase than the bigger one that smaller increase than the bigger one that could smaller increase than the bigger one that could have smaller increase than the bigger one that could have been smaller increase than the bigger one that could have been happened! that could have been happened! <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> That <INTERRUPTION> That is <INTERRUPTION> That is what <INTERRUPTION> That is what he's... <INTERRUPTION> That is what he's... Now <INTERRUPTION> That is what he's... Now working <INTERRUPTION> That is what he's... Now working off That is what he's... Now working off seven That is what he's... Now working off seven years That is what he's... Now working off seven years ago. That is what he's... Now working off seven years ago. Those That is what he's... Now working off seven years ago. Those families That is what he's... Now working off seven years ago. Those families are seven years ago. Those families are all seven years ago. Those families are all significantly seven years ago. Those families are all significantly better seven years ago. Those families are all significantly better off, seven years ago. Those families are all significantly better off, and all significantly better off, and they all significantly better off, and they are all significantly better off, and they are better all significantly better off, and they are better off all significantly better off, and they are better off because all significantly better off, and they are better off because this they are better off because this Government they are better off because this Government did they are better off because this Government did not they are better off because this Government did not take they are better off because this Government did not take the they are better off because this Government did not take the advice Government did not take the advice of Government did not take the advice all Government did not take the advice of the Labour Government did not take the advice of the Labour Party Government did not take the advice of the Labour Party over Government did not take the advice of the Labour Party over the Government did not take the advice of the Labour Party over the six Government did not take the advice of the Labour Party over the six or of the Labour Party over the six or seven of the Labour Party over the six or seven years, of the Labour Party over the six or seven years, and of the Labour Party over the six or seven years, and spray of the Labour Party over the six or seven years, and spray money of the Labour Party over the six or seven years, and spray money at seven years, and spray money at everything. seven years, and spray money at everything. <INTERRUPTION> everything. <INTERRUPTION> We everything. <INTERRUPTION> We actually... everything. <INTERRUPTION> We actually... We everything. <INTERRUPTION> We actually... We actually everything. <INTERRUPTION> We actually... We actually looked We actually... We actually looked after We actually... We actually looked after the We actually... We actually looked after the public We actually... We actually looked after the public resources. We actually... We actually looked after the public resources. Now We actually... We actually looked after the public resources. Now we after the public resources. Now we have after the public resources. Now we We after the public resources. Now we have surpluses and after the public resources. Now we have surpluses and now after the public resources. Now we have surpluses and now we after the public resources. Now we have surpluses and now we have after the public resources. Now we have surpluses and now we have some have surpluses and now we have some choices. have surpluses and now we have some choices. <INTERRUPTION> choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did the choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did the Minister choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did the Minister of choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did the Minister of Finance choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did the Minister of Finance tell choices. <INTERRUPTION> Did the Minister of Finance tell him Did the Minister of Finance tell him about Did the Minister of Finance tell him about any Did the Minister of Finance tell him about any feedback Did the Minister of Finance tell him about any feedback that Did the Minister of Finance tell him about any feedback that he's about any feedback that he's received about any feedback that he's received on about any feedback that he's received on the about any feedback that he's received on the Family about any feedback that he's received on the Family Income received on the Family Income Package? received on the Family Income Package? Well, received on the Family Income Package? Well, as received on the Family Income Package? Well, as a received on the Family Income Package? Well, as a matter received on the Family Income Package? Well, as a matter of received on the Family Income Package? Well, as a matter of fact, Package? Well, as a matter of fact, he Package? Well, as a matter of fact, he did. Package? Well, as a matter of fact, he did. The Package? Well, as a matter of fact, he did. The Minister Package? Well, as a matter of fact, he did. The Minister of Package? Well, as a matter of fact, he did. The Minister of Finance, he did. The Minister of Finance, being he did. The Minister of Finance, Package? he did. The Minister of Finance, being someone who he did. The Minister of Finance, being someone who has he did. The Minister of Finance, being someone who has a he did. The Minister of Finance, being someone who has a real he did. The Minister of Finance, being someone who has a real skill being someone who has a real skill for being someone who has a real skill for listening being someone who has a real skill for listening to being someone who has a real skill for listening to the being someone who has a real skill for listening to the new being someone who has a real skill for listening to the new public, being someone who has a real skill for listening to the new public, and for listening to the new public, and he for listening to the new public, and he advised for listening to the new public, and he advised me for listening to the new public, and he advised me that for listening to the new public, and he advised me that the for listening to the new public, and he advised me that the package for listening to the new public, and he advised me that the package has he advised me that the package has had he advised me that the package has had widespread he advised me that the package has had widespread support he advised me that the package has had widespread support around he advised me that the package has had widespread support around the had widespread support around the country, had widespread support around the country, and had widespread support around the country, and within had widespread support around the country, and within the had widespread support around the country, and within the Parliament. country, and within the Parliament. The country, and within the Parliament. The Minister country, and within the Parliament. The Minister of country, and within the Parliament. The Minister of Finance country, and within the Parliament. The Minister of Finance advised country, and within the Parliament. The Minister of Finance advised me The Minister of Finance advised me somewhat The Minister of Finance advised me somewhat to The Minister of Finance advised me somewhat to my The Minister of Finance advised me somewhat to my surprise The Minister of Finance advised me somewhat to my surprise that The Minister of Finance advised me somewhat to my surprise that the somewhat to my surprise that the Greens somewhat to my surprise that the Greens had somewhat to my surprise that the Greens had voted somewhat to my surprise that the Greens had voted for somewhat to my surprise that the Greens had voted for the somewhat to my surprise that the Greens had voted for the package. Greens had voted for the package. This Greens had voted for the package. This - Greens had voted for the package. This - and Greens had voted for the package. This - and he Greens had voted for the package. This - and he advised Greens had voted for the package. This - and he advised me Greens had voted for the package. This - and he advised me that Greens had voted for the package. This - and he advised me that New This - and he advised me that New Zealand This - and he advised me that New Zealand first This - and he advised me that New Zealand first had This - and he advised me that New Zealand first had voted This - and he advised me that New Zealand first had voted for This - and he advised me that New Zealand first had voted for it. Zealand first had voted for it. Having Zealand first had voted for it. Having advised Zealand first had voted for it. Having advised me Zealand first had voted for it. Having advised me some Zealand first had voted for it. Having advised me some time Zealand first had voted for it. Having advised me some time ago Zealand first had voted for it. Having advised me some time ago that Having advised me some time ago that the Having advised me some time ago that the Greens Having advised me some time ago that the Greens and Having advised me some time ago that the Greens and Labour Having advised me some time ago that the Greens and Labour had Having advised me some time ago that the Greens and Labour had a the Greens and Labour had a memorandum the Greens and Labour had a memorandum of the Greens and Labour had a memorandum of understanding the Greens and Labour had a memorandum of understanding which memorandum of understanding which indicated memorandum of understanding which indicated they memorandum of understanding which indicated they were memorandum of understanding which indicated they were communicating indicated they were communicating closely indicated they were communicating closely on indicated they were communicating closely on all indicated they were communicating closely on all matters, indicated they were communicating closely on all matters, and indicated they were communicating closely on all matters, and the closely on all matters, and the Minister closely on all matters, and the Minister of closely on all matters, and the Minister of Finance closely on all matters, and the Minister of Finance advised closely on all matters, and the Minister of Finance advised me closely on all matters, and the Minister of Finance advised me that Minister of Finance advised me that the Minister of Finance advised me that the Greens Minister of Finance advised me that the Greens did Minister of Finance advised me that the Greens did not Minister of Finance advised me that the Greens did not tell Minister of Finance advised me that the Greens did not tell the Minister of Finance advised me that the Greens did not tell the Labour the Greens did not tell the Labour Party... the Greens did not tell the Labour Party... Order! the Greens did not tell the Labour Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We are Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We are now Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We are now getting Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We are now getting away Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We are now getting away from Party... Order! <INTERRUPTION> We are now getting away from the We are now getting away from the original We are now getting away from the original question. We are now getting away from the original question. Supplementary. original question. Supplementary. Moving original question. Supplementary. Moving on original question. Supplementary. Moving on in original question. Supplementary. Moving on in the original question. Supplementary. Moving on in the misleading Moving on in the misleading statements Moving on in the misleading statements of Moving on in the misleading statements of the Moving on in the misleading statements of the Minister Moving on in the misleading statements of the Minister of statements of the Minister of Finance, statements of the Minister of Finance, are statements of the Minister of Finance, are early statements of the Minister of Finance, are early childhood Finance, are early childhood education Finance, are early childhood education providers Finance, are early childhood education providers right Finance, are early childhood education providers right or Finance, are early childhood education providers right or wrong Finance, are early childhood education providers right or wrong - education providers right or wrong - is education providers right or wrong - is that education providers right or wrong - is that the education providers right or wrong - is that the latecomer education providers right or wrong - is that the latecomer talking? is that the latecomer talking? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Are <INTERRUPTION> Are the... <INTERRUPTION> Are the... Are <INTERRUPTION> Are the... Are early... <INTERRUPTION> Are the... Are early... Order! <INTERRUPTION> Are the... Are early... Order! I Are the... Are early... Order! I know Are the... Are early... Order! I know the Are the... Are early... Order! I know the member Are the... Are early... Order! I know the member was Are the... Are early... Order! I know the member was responding Are the... Are early... Order! I know the member was responding to know the member was responding to interjections, know the member was responding to interjections, so know the member was responding to interjections, so I know the member was responding to interjections, so I want know the member was responding to interjections, so I want the interjections, so I want the interjection interjections, so I want the interjection from interjections, so I want the interjection from my interjections, so I want the interjection from my right interjections, so I want the interjection from my right to interjections, so I want the interjection from my right to cease interjection from my right to cease why interjection from my right to cease why the interjection from my right to cease why the supplementary interjection from my right to cease why the supplementary question interjection from my right to cease why the supplementary question is why the supplementary question is asked. why the supplementary question is why why the supplementary question is asked. Thank you. why the supplementary question is asked. Thank you. Maintain why the supplementary question is asked. Thank you. Maintain decorum. asked. Thank you. Maintain decorum. Are asked. Thank you. Maintain decorum. Are early asked. Thank you. Maintain decorum. Are early childhood asked. Thank you. Maintain decorum. Are early childhood providers asked. Thank you. Maintain decorum. Are early childhood providers right Are early childhood providers right or Are early childhood providers right or wrong Are early childhood providers right or wrong when Are early childhood providers right or wrong when they Are early childhood providers right or wrong when they say Are early childhood providers right or wrong when they say this Are early childhood providers right or wrong when they say this Budget or wrong when they say this Budget "means or wrong when they say this Budget "means the or wrong when they say this Budget "means the average or wrong when they say this Budget "means the average child-care or wrong when they say this Budget "means the average child-care centre "means the average child-care centre losses "means the average child-care centre losses $15,000" "means the average child-care centre losses $15,000" in "means the average child-care centre losses $15,000" in real "means the average child-care centre losses $15,000" in real terms losses $15,000" in real terms because losses $15,000" in real terms because per losses $15,000" in real terms because per pupil losses $15,000" in real terms because per pupil funding losses $15,000" in real terms because per pupil funding is losses $15,000" in real terms because per pupil funding is frozen? because per pupil funding is frozen? No. because per pupil funding is frozen? No. They because per pupil funding is frozen? No. They are because per pupil funding is frozen? No. They are not because per pupil funding is frozen? No. They are not correct. because per pupil funding is frozen? No. They are not correct. The because per pupil funding is frozen? No. They are not correct. The early No. They are not correct. The early childhood No. They are not correct. The early childhood funding No. They are not correct. The early childhood funding has No. They are not correct. The early childhood funding has expanded childhood funding has expanded pretty childhood funding has expanded pretty dramatically childhood funding has expanded pretty dramatically actually childhood funding has expanded pretty dramatically actually under pretty dramatically actually under this pretty dramatically actually under this Government pretty dramatically actually under this Government by pretty dramatically actually under this Government by almost pretty dramatically actually under this Government by almost a pretty dramatically actually under this Government by almost a billion. this Government by almost a billion. It this Government by almost a billion. It was this Government by almost a billion. It was around this Government by almost a billion. It was around $800 this Government by almost a billion. It was around $800 million this Government by almost a billion. It was around $800 million and this Government by almost a billion. It was around $800 million and we It was around $800 million and we became It was around $800 million and we became the It was around $800 million and we became the Government. It was around $800 million and we became the Government. It's It was around $800 million and we became the Government. It's now It was around $800 million and we became the Government. It's now over became the Government. It's now over - became the Government. It's now over - now became the Government. It's now over - now overed became the Government. It's now over - now overed $-- became the Government. It's now over - now overed $-- now became the Government. It's now over - now overed $-- now over became the Government. It's now over - now overed $-- now over $1.7 - now overed $-- now over $1.7 billion. - now overed $-- now over $1.7 billion. Of - now overed $-- now over $1.7 billion. Of course, - now overed $-- now over $1.7 billion. Of course, some - now overed $-- now over $1.7 billion. Of course, some people - now overed $-- now over $1.7 billion. Of course, some people are billion. Of course, some people are going billion. Of course, some people are going to billion. Of course, some people are going to say billion. Of course, some people are going to say they billion. Of course, some people are going to say they didn't billion. Of course, some people are going to say they didn't get billion. Of course, some people are going to say they didn't get as billion. Of course, some people are going to say they didn't get as much going to say they didn't get as much as going to say they didn't get as much as they going to say they didn't get as much as they wanted. going to say they didn't get as much as they wanted. But going to say they didn't get as much as they wanted. But one going to say they didn't get as much as they wanted. But one of going to say they didn't get as much as they wanted. But one of the as they wanted. But one of the reasons as they wanted. But one of the reasons for as they wanted. But one of the reasons for that as they wanted. But one of the reasons for that is as they wanted. But one of the reasons for that is because as they wanted. But one of the reasons for that is because we as they wanted. But one of the reasons for that is because we want reasons for that is because we want to reasons for that is because we want to spread reasons for that is because we want to spread the reasons for that is because we want to spread the benefits reasons for that is because we want to spread the benefits of reasons for that is because we want to spread the benefits of growth to spread the benefits of growth right to spread the benefits of growth right across to spread the benefits of growth right across the to spread the benefits of growth right across the community, right across the community, particularly right across the community, reasons right across the community, particularly to the right across the community, particularly to the type right across the community, particularly to the type of right across the community, particularly to the type of families particularly to the type of families that particularly to the type of families that the particularly to the type of families that the member particularly to the type of families that the member was particularly to the type of families that the member was trying particularly to the type of families that the member was trying to particularly to the type of families that the member was trying to quote that the member was trying to quote this that the member was trying to quote this morning, that the member was trying to quote this morning, the that the member was trying to quote this morning, the family that the member was trying to quote this morning, the family in that the member was trying to quote this morning, the family in West this morning, the family in West Auckland, this morning, the family in West Auckland, where this morning, the family in West Auckland, where he this morning, the family in West Auckland, where he just this morning, the family in West Auckland, where he just happened this morning, the family in West Auckland, where he just happened to Auckland, where he just happened to leave Auckland, where he just happened to leave out Auckland, where he just happened to leave out - Auckland, where he just happened to leave out - or Auckland, where he just happened to leave out - or Grant Auckland, where he just happened to leave out - or Grant Robertson Auckland, where he just happened to leave out - or Grant Robertson had leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out the leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out the fact leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out the fact they leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out the fact they could leave out - or Grant Robertson had to leave out the fact they could be to leave out the fact they could be eligible to leave out the fact they could be eligible for to leave out the fact they could be eligible for $80 to leave out the fact they could be eligible for $80 per to leave out the fact they could be eligible for $80 per week to leave out the fact they could be eligible for $80 per week of eligible for $80 per week of accommodation eligible for $80 per week of accommodation supplement. eligible for $80 per week of accommodation supplement. Order. accommodation supplement. Order. Supplementary accommodation supplement. Order. Supplementary question. accommodation supplement. Order. Supplementary question. Is accommodation supplement. Order. Supplementary question. Is it accommodation supplement. Order. Supplementary question. Is it not accommodation supplement. Order. Supplementary question. Is it not a Supplementary question. Is it not a fact, Supplementary question. Is it not a fact, PM, Supplementary question. Is it not a fact, PM, that Supplementary question. Is it not a fact, PM, that far Supplementary question. Is it not a fact, PM, that far from Supplementary question. Is it not a fact, PM, that far from being fact, PM, that far from being confident fact, PM, that far from being accommodation fact, PM, that far from being confident about his fact, PM, that far from being confident about his Budget, fact, PM, that far from being confident about his Budget, he's confident about his Budget, he's cutting confident about his Budget, he's cutting and confident about his Budget, he's cutting and running confident about his Budget, he's cutting and running off confident about his Budget, he's cutting and running off to confident about his Budget, he's cutting and running off to Samoa confident about his Budget, he's cutting and running off to Samoa for cutting and running off to Samoa for four cutting and running off to Samoa for four days... cutting and running off to Samoa for four days... <INTERRUPTION> four days... <INTERRUPTION> Four four days... <INTERRUPTION> Four days! four days... <INTERRUPTION> Four days! For four days... <INTERRUPTION> Four days! For the four days... <INTERRUPTION> Four days! For the Independence four days... <INTERRUPTION> Four days! For the Independence Day Four days! For the Independence Day celebration, Four days! For the Independence Day celebration, which Four days! For the Independence Day celebration, which begins Four days! For the Independence Day celebration, which begins on Four days! For the Independence Day celebration, which begins on 1 Four days! For the Independence Day celebration, which begins on 1 June celebration, which begins on 1 June - celebration, which begins on 1 June - not celebration, which begins on 1 June - not tomorrow celebration, which begins on 1 June - not tomorrow - celebration, which begins on 1 June - not tomorrow - and, celebration, which begins on 1 June - not tomorrow - and, therefore, celebration, which begins on 1 June - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able to - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able to - - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able to - and - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able to - and doesn't - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able to - and doesn't want - not tomorrow - and, therefore, he is not able to - and doesn't want to is not able to - and doesn't want to face is not able to - and doesn't want to face - is not able to - and doesn't want to face - accountability is not able to - and doesn't want to face - accountability in is not able to - and doesn't want to face - accountability in this is not able to - and doesn't want to face - accountability in this House? face - accountability in this House? <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Well, <INTERRUPTION> Well, it <INTERRUPTION> Well, it will <INTERRUPTION> Well, it will be <INTERRUPTION> Well, it will be - <INTERRUPTION> Well, it will be - it <INTERRUPTION> Well, it will be - it isn't <INTERRUPTION> Well, it will be - it isn't quite Well, it will be - it isn't quite four Well, it will be - it isn't quite four days, Well, it will be - it isn't quite four days, it Well, it will be - it isn't quite four days, it will Well, it will be - it isn't quite four days, it will be Well, it will be - it isn't quite four days, it will be longer Well, it will be - it isn't quite four days, it will be longer than four days, it will be longer than that four days, it will be longer than that member four days, it will be longer than that member has four days, it will be longer than that member has spent four days, it will be longer than that member has spent in four days, it will be longer than that member has spent in the that member has spent in the Northland that member has spent in the Northland electorate that member has spent in the Northland electorate since that member has spent in the Northland electorate since he that member has spent in the Northland electorate since he became Northland electorate since he became elected! Northland electorate since he became elected! <INTERRUPTION> elected! <INTERRUPTION> . elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! Point elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! Point of elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! Point of order. elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! Point of order. I elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! Point of order. I want elected! <INTERRUPTION> . Order! Point of order. I want to . Order! Point of order. I want to hear . Order! Point of order. I want to hear the . Order! Point of order. I want to hear the point . Order! Point of order. I want to hear the point of . Order! Point of order. I want to hear the point of order . Order! Point of order. I want to hear the point of order in . Order! Point of order. I want to hear the point of order in silence. hear the point of order in silence. As hear the point of order in silence. As you hear the point of order in silence. As you know, hear the point of order in silence. As you know, he hear the point of order in silence. As you know, he started hear the point of order in silence. As you know, he started out hear the point of order in silence. As you know, he started out and hear the point of order in silence. As you know, he started out and he As you know, he started out and he was As you know, he started out and he was going As you know, he started out and he was going so As you know, he started out and he was going so well, As you know, he started out and he was going so well, until As you know, he started out and he was going so well, until he As you know, he started out and he was going so well, until he decided was going so well, until he decided to was going so well, until he decided to start was going so well, until he decided to start telling was going so well, until he decided to start telling lies. was going so well, until he decided to start telling lies. Order! to start telling lies. Order! <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> The <INTERRUPTION> The member <INTERRUPTION> The member asked <INTERRUPTION> The member asked a <INTERRUPTION> The member asked a very <INTERRUPTION> The member asked a very political The member asked a very political question. The member asked a very political question. He The member asked a very political question. He can The member asked a very political question. He can expect The member asked a very political question. He can expect a The member asked a very political question. He can expect a fairly question. He can expect a fairly robust question. He can expect a fairly <INTERRUPTION> question. He can expect a fairly robust answer. Does question. He can expect a fairly robust answer. Does the question. He can expect a fairly robust answer. Does the PM question. He can expect a fairly robust answer. Does the PM wish question. He can expect a fairly robust answer. Does the PM wish to robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete his robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete his answer? robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete his answer? I robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete his answer? I was robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete his answer? I was going robust answer. Does the PM wish to complete his answer? I was going to complete his answer? I was going to point complete his answer? I was going to point out complete his answer? I was going to point out to complete his answer? I was going to point out to the complete his answer? I was going to point out to the member complete his answer? I was going to point out to the member I complete his answer? I was going to point out to the member I have complete his answer? I was going to point out to the member I have a complete his answer? I was going to point out to the member I have a lot point out to the member I have a lot of point out to the member I have a lot of relatives point out to the member I have a lot of relatives in point out to the member I have a lot of relatives in Samoa point out to the member I have a lot of relatives in Samoa and point out to the member I have a lot of relatives in Samoa and it point out to the member I have a lot of relatives in Samoa and it would of relatives in Samoa and it would be of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude not of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude not to of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude not to meet of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude not to meet them of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude not to meet them all of relatives in Samoa and it would be rude not to meet them all while be rude not to meet them all while I'm be rude not to meet them all while I'm there. be rude not to meet them all while I'm there. <INTERRUPTION> I'm there. <INTERRUPTION> . I'm there. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary I'm there. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary question, I'm there. <INTERRUPTION> . Supplementary question, Andrew . Supplementary question, Andrew Little. . Supplementary question, Andrew Little. 500 . Supplementary question, Andrew Little. 500 principles . Supplementary question, Andrew Little. 500 principles who . Supplementary question, Andrew Little. 500 principles who wrote . Supplementary question, Andrew Little. 500 principles who wrote an Little. 500 principles who wrote an open Little. 500 principles who wrote an open letter Little. 500 principles who wrote an open letter to Little. 500 principles who wrote an open letter to him, Little. 500 principles who wrote an open letter to him, right Little. 500 principles who wrote an open letter to him, right or Little. 500 principles who wrote an open letter to him, right or wrong, open letter to him, right or wrong, when open letter to him, right or wrong, when they open letter to him, right or wrong, when they say open letter to him, right or wrong, when they say the open letter to him, right or wrong, when they say the funding open letter to him, right or wrong, when they say the funding freeze when they say the funding freeze means when they say the funding freeze means they when they say the funding freeze means they can't when they say the funding freeze means they can't afford when they say the funding freeze means they can't afford to when they say the funding freeze means they can't afford to pay means they can't afford to pay teacher means they can't afford to pay teacher aides means they can't afford to pay teacher aides better means they can't afford to pay teacher aides better without means they can't afford to pay teacher aides better without cutting teacher aides better without cutting their teacher aides better without cutting their hours? teacher aides better without cutting their hours? Well, teacher aides better without cutting their hours? Well, they teacher aides better without cutting their hours? Well, they are teacher aides better without cutting their hours? Well, they are wrong teacher aides better without cutting their hours? Well, they are wrong in their hours? Well, they are wrong in referring their hours? Well, they are wrong in referring to their hours? Well, they are wrong in referring to a their hours? Well, they are wrong in referring to a funding their hours? Well, they are wrong in referring to a funding freeze. their hours? Well, they are wrong in referring to a funding freeze. No referring to a funding freeze. No such referring to a funding freeze. No such thing referring to a funding freeze. No such thing has referring to a funding freeze. No such thing has occurred. referring to a funding freeze. No such thing has occurred. But referring to a funding freeze. No such thing has occurred. But I referring to a funding freeze. No such thing has occurred. But I think such thing has occurred. But I think where such thing has occurred. But I think where we such thing has occurred. But I think where we would such thing has occurred. But I think where we would agree such thing has occurred. But I think where we would agree with such thing has occurred. But I think where we would agree with the where we would agree with the principals where we would agree with the principals - where we would agree with the principals - if where we would agree with the principals - if not where we would agree with the principals - if not with where we would agree with the principals - if not with the where we would agree with the principals - if not with the Labour principals - if not with the Labour Party principals - if not with the Labour Party - principals - if not with the Labour Party - is principals - if not with the Labour Party - is that principals - if not with the Labour Party - is that it's principals - if not with the Labour Party - is that it's the principals - if not with the Labour Party - is that it's the way principals - if not with the Labour Party - is that it's the way the Party - is that it's the way the money Party - is that it's the way the money is Party - is that it's the way the money is spent Party - is that it's the way the money is spent and Party - is that it's the way the money is spent and the Party - is that it's the way the money is spent and the results Party - is that it's the way the money is spent and the results we money is spent and the results we achieve money is spent and the results we achieve for money is spent and the results we achieve for children money is spent and the results we achieve for children that money is spent and the results we achieve for children that matters achieve for children that matters more achieve for children that matters more than achieve for children that matters more than the achieve for children that matters more than the Labour achieve for children that matters more than the Labour Party more than the Labour Party calculations more than the Labour Party calculations about more than the Labour Party calculations about how more than the Labour Party calculations about how much more than the Labour Party calculations about how much money calculations about how much money they calculations about how much money calculations calculations about how much money they think schools calculations about how much money they think schools could calculations about how much money they think schools could have calculations about how much money they think schools could have got. they think schools could have got. You they think schools could have got. You don't they think schools could have got. You don't show they think schools could have got. You don't show your they think schools could have got. You don't show your care they think schools could have got. You don't show your care about You don't show your care about education You don't show your care about calculations You don't show your care about education just by You don't show your care about education just by spending You don't show your care about education just by spending hundreds education just by spending hundreds of education just by spending hundreds education education just by spending hundreds of millions on education just by spending hundreds of millions on it. education just by spending hundreds of millions on it. You education just by spending hundreds of millions on it. You show education just by spending hundreds of millions on it. You show you education just by spending hundreds of millions on it. You show you care of millions on it. You show you care by of millions on it. You show you care by making of millions on it. You show you care by making sure of millions on it. You show you care by making sure that of millions on it. You show you care by making sure that each of millions on it. You show you care by making sure that each child of millions on it. You show you care by making sure that each child gets by making sure that each child gets the by making sure that each child gets the opportunity by making sure that each child gets the opportunity free by making sure that each child gets the opportunity free education the opportunity free education should the opportunity free education by the opportunity free education should give them, the opportunity free education should give them, and the opportunity free education should give them, and that's the opportunity free education should give them, and that's the should give them, and that's the opportunity should give them, and that's the opportunity to should give them, and that's the opportunity to become should give them, and that's the opportunity to become a should give them, and that's the opportunity to become a functioning opportunity to become a functioning literate opportunity to become a functioning literate and opportunity to become a functioning literate and numerate opportunity to become a functioning literate and numerate citizen. literate and numerate citizen. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> What <INTERRUPTION> What does <INTERRUPTION> What does he <INTERRUPTION> What does he say <INTERRUPTION> What does he say to <INTERRUPTION> What does he say to home <INTERRUPTION> What does he say to home buyers <INTERRUPTION> What does he say to home buyers who What does he say to home buyers who can What does he say to home buyers who can look What does he say to home buyers who can look forward What does he say to home buyers who can look forward to What does he say to home buyers who can look forward to house What does he say to home buyers who can look forward to house prices can look forward to house prices rising can look forward to house prices rising at can look forward to house prices rising at three can look forward to house prices rising at three times can look forward to house prices rising at three times the can look forward to house prices rising at three times the rate can look forward to house prices rising at three times the rate of rising at three times the rate of wages, rising at three times the rate of wages, according rising at three times the rate of wages, according to rising at three times the rate of wages, according to his rising at three times the rate of wages, according to his Budget's wages, according to his Budget's forecast? wages, according to his Budget's forecast? I wages, according to his Budget's forecast? I would wages, according to his Budget's forecast? I would say wages, according to his Budget's forecast? I would say to wages, according to his Budget's forecast? I would say to them wages, according to his Budget's forecast? I would say to them there forecast? I would say to them there is forecast? I would say to them there is more forecast? I would say to them there is more houses forecast? I would say to them there is more houses being forecast? I would say to them there is more houses being built forecast? I would say to them there is more houses being built now forecast? I would say to them there is more houses being built now than is more houses being built now than there is more houses being built now than there have is more houses being built now than there have been is more houses being built now than there have been for is more houses being built now than there have been for many is more houses being built now than there have been for many decades, there have been for many decades, and there have been for many decades, and that there have been for many decades, and that particularly there have been for many decades, and that particularly if there have been for many decades, and that particularly if they there have been for many decades, and that particularly if they are there have been for many decades, and that particularly if they are in and that particularly if they are in Auckland, and that particularly if they are in Auckland, the and that particularly if they are in Auckland, the best and that particularly if they are in Auckland, the best thing and that particularly if they are in Auckland, the best thing they and that particularly if they are in Auckland, the best thing they can and that particularly if they are in Auckland, the best thing they can do Auckland, the best thing they can do is Auckland, the best thing they can do is tell Auckland, the best thing they can do is tell the Auckland, the best thing they can do is tell the Labour Auckland, the best thing they can do is tell the Labour Party Auckland, the best thing they can do is tell the Labour Party to Auckland, the best thing they can do is tell the Labour Party to stop is tell the Labour Party to stop opposing is tell the Labour Party to stop opposing large is tell the Labour Party to stop opposing large developments is tell the Labour Party to stop opposing large developments in opposing large developments in Auckland, opposing large developments in Auckland, such opposing large developments in Auckland, such as opposing large developments in Auckland, such as the opposing large developments in Auckland, such as the Three opposing large developments in Auckland, such as the Three Kings Auckland, such as the Three Kings and Auckland, such as the Three Kings and the Auckland, such as the Three Kings and the Point Auckland, such as the Three Kings and the Point glintd Auckland, such as the Three Kings and the Point glintd development Auckland, such as the Three Kings and the Point glintd development -- and the Point glintd development -- Point and the Point glintd development -- Point England and the Point glintd development -- Point England development, and the Point glintd development -- Point England development, because Point England development, because they Point England development, because is Point England development, because they would have Point England development, because they would have allowed Point England development, because they would have allowed for they would have allowed for thousands they would have allowed for thousands more they would have allowed for thousands more houses, they would have allowed for thousands more houses, which they would have allowed for thousands more houses, which would thousands more houses, which would have thousands more houses, which would have helped thousands more houses, which would have helped with thousands more houses, which would have helped with the thousands more houses, which would have helped with the price. thousands more houses, which would have helped with the price. But have helped with the price. But Labour have helped with the price. But Labour insist have helped with the price. But Labour insist on have helped with the price. But Labour insist on opposing Labour insist on opposing developments, Labour insist on opposing developments, while Labour insist on opposing developments, while promising Labour insist on opposing developments, while promising a developments, while promising a housing developments, while promising a housing policy developments, while promising a housing policy here. developments, while promising a housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why does housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why does he housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why does he think housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why does he think he housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why does he think he knows housing policy here. <INTERRUPTION> Why does he think he knows better Why does he think he knows better than Why does he think he knows better than GPs Why does he think he knows better than GPs about Why does he think he knows better than GPs about health, Why does he think he knows better than GPs about health, better Why does he think he knows better than GPs about health, better than than GPs about health, better than principles than GPs about health, better than principles about than GPs about health, better than principles about schools, than GPs about health, better than principles about schools, and than GPs about health, better than principles about schools, and better principles about schools, and better than principles about schools, and better than you principles about schools, and better than you can principles about schools, and better than you can couples principles about schools, and better than you can couples -- principles about schools, and better than you can couples -- young than you can couples -- young couples than you can couples -- young couples about than you can couples -- young couples about the than you can couples -- young couples about the housing than you can couples -- young couples about the housing crisis? couples about the housing crisis? Can't couples about the housing crisis? Can't he couples about the housing crisis? Can't he say couples about the housing crisis? Can't he say after couples about the housing crisis? Can't he say after nine couples about the housing crisis? Can't he say after nine years couples about the housing crisis? Can't he say after nine years after Can't he say after nine years after failing Can't he say after nine years after failing all Can't he say after nine years after failing all those Can't he say after nine years after failing all those people Can't he say after nine years after failing all those people it Can't he say after nine years after failing all those people it is Can't he say after nine years after failing all those people it is time failing all those people it is time for failing all those people it is time for a failing all those people it is time for a fresh failing all those people it is time for a fresh approach, failing all those people it is time for a fresh approach, not failing all those people it is time for a fresh approach, not a failing all those people it is time for a fresh approach, not a shoddy for a fresh approach, not a shoddy election for a fresh approach, not a shoddy election bribe? for a fresh approach, not a shoddy election bribe? Hear, for a fresh approach, not a shoddy election bribe? Hear, hear! for a fresh approach, not a shoddy election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, for a fresh approach, not a shoddy election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of course election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of course we election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of course we don't election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of course we don't know election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of course we don't know more election bribe? Hear, hear! Well, of course we don't know more about course we don't know more about those course we don't know more about those specialised course we don't know more about those specialised professional course we don't know more about those specialised professional tasks those specialised professional tasks and those specialised professional tasks and the those specialised professional tasks and the people those specialised professional tasks and the people who those specialised professional tasks and the people who carry those specialised professional tasks and the people who carry them those specialised professional tasks and the people who carry them out, and the people who carry them out, but and the people who carry them out, but some and the people who carry them out, but some of and the people who carry them out, but some of them and the people who carry them out, but some of them have and the people who carry them out, but some of them have been and the people who carry them out, but some of them have been mislead but some of them have been mislead by but some of them have been mislead by the but some of them have been mislead by the Labour but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, and but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, and if but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, and if I but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, and if I - but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, and if I - I but some of them have been mislead by the Labour Party, and if I - I - by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this is by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this is where by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this is where the by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this is where the leader by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this is where the leader of by the Labour Party, and if I - I - this is where the leader of the this is where the leader of the Labour this is where the leader of the this this is where the leader of the Labour Party and this is where the leader of the Labour Party and those this is where the leader of the Labour Party and those groups this is where the leader of the Labour Party and those groups have Labour Party and those groups have something Labour Party and those groups have something in Labour Party and those groups have something in common. Labour Party and those groups have something in common. If Labour Party and those groups have something in common. If they Labour Party and those groups have something in common. If they are something in common. If they are relying something in common. If they are relying on something in common. If they are relying on Grant something in common. If they are relying on Grant Robertson's relying on Grant Robertson's numbers, relying on Grant Robertson's numbers, they relying on Grant Robertson's numbers, they will relying on Grant Robertson's numbers, they will be relying on Grant Robertson's numbers, they will be embarrassed. numbers, they will be embarrassed. Question numbers, they will be embarrassed. Question No. numbers, they will be embarrassed. Question No. 3. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Prime My question is to the Prime Minister: My question is to the Prime Minister: Does My question is to the Prime Minister: Does he My question is to the Prime Minister: Does he stand My question is to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by My question is to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all My question is to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his Minister: Does he stand by all his Government's Minister: Does he stand by all his Government's decisions? Yes. Yes. Especially Yes. Especially the Yes. Especially the Family Yes. Especially the Family Income Yes. Especially the Family Income Package Yes. Especially the Family Income Package in Yes. Especially the Family Income Package in the Yes. Especially the Family Income Package in the 2017 Yes. Especially the Family Income Package in the 2017 Budget, Yes. Especially the Family Income Package in the 2017 Budget, which Package in the 2017 Budget, which provides Package in the 2017 Budget, which provides around Package in the 2017 Budget, which provides around $2 Package in the 2017 Budget, which provides around $2 billion Package in the 2017 Budget, which provides around $2 billion to provides around $2 billion to support provides around $2 billion to support family provides around $2 billion to support family incomes. provides around $2 billion to support family incomes. It provides around $2 billion to support family incomes. It will support family incomes. It will benefit support family incomes. It will benefit around support family incomes. It will benefit around $1.3 support family incomes. It will benefit around $1.3 -- support family incomes. It will benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 support family incomes. It will benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families by benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families by an benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families by an average benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families by an average of benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families by an average of $26 benefit around $1.3 -- 1.3 million families by an average of $26 a families by an average of $26 a week. families by an average of $26 a week. I'm families by an average of $26 a week. I'm pleased families by an average of $26 a week. I'm pleased to families by an average of $26 a week. I'm pleased to see families by an average of $26 a week. I'm pleased to see that families by an average of $26 a week. I'm pleased to see that member week. I'm pleased to see that member supports week. I'm pleased to see that member supports this week. I'm pleased to see that member supports this decision, week. I'm pleased to see that member supports this decision, because week. I'm pleased to see that member supports this decision, because it supports this decision, because it will supports this decision, because it will help supports this decision, because it will help so supports this decision, because it will help so many supports this decision, because it will help so many low supports this decision, because it will help so many low and will help so many low and middle-income will help so many low and middle-income earners, will help so many low and middle-income earners, with will help so many low and middle-income earners, with young middle-income earners, with young families, middle-income earners, with young families, and middle-income earners, with young families, and it middle-income earners, with young families, and it is middle-income earners, with young families, and it is impressive middle-income earners, with young families, and it is impressive that families, and it is impressive that the families, and it is impressive that the Greens families, and it is impressive that the Greens thought families, and it is impressive that the Greens thought supporting families, and it is impressive that the Greens thought supporting those the Greens thought supporting those families the Greens thought supporting those families was the Greens thought supporting those families was more the Greens thought supporting those families was more important the Greens thought supporting those families was more important than families was more important than supporting families was more important than families families was more important than supporting a dysfunctional families was more important than supporting a dysfunctional and supporting a dysfunctional and failing supporting a dysfunctional and failing Labour supporting a dysfunctional and failing Labour Party. supporting a dysfunctional and failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> Does failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> Does he failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> Does he stand failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> Does he stand by failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> Does he stand by his failing Labour Party. <INTERRUPTION> Does he stand by his Government's Does he stand by his Government's decision Does he stand by his Government's decision in Does he stand by his Government's decision in last Does he stand by his Government's decision in last week's Does he stand by his Government's decision in last week's Budget Does he stand by his Government's decision in last week's Budget to decision in last week's Budget to cut decision in last week's Budget to cut funding decision in last week's Budget to cut funding for decision in last week's Budget to cut funding for rhuematic decision in last week's Budget to cut funding for rhuematic fever cut funding for rhuematic fever prevention cut funding for rhuematic fever prevention when cut funding for rhuematic fever prevention when rhuematic cut funding for rhuematic fever prevention when rhuematic fever prevention when rhuematic fever rates prevention when rhuematic fever rates are prevention when rhuematic fever rates are rising? prevention when rhuematic fever rates are rising? Well, prevention when rhuematic fever rates are rising? Well, I prevention when rhuematic fever rates are rising? Well, I would prevention when rhuematic fever rates are rising? Well, I would have rates are rising? Well, I would have to rates are rising? Well, I would have to check rates are rising? Well, I would have to check the rates are rising? Well, I would have to check the details rates are rising? Well, I would have to check the details about rates are rising? Well, I would have to check the details about the to check the details about the actual to check the details about the actual funding to check the details about the actual funding for to check the details about the actual funding for rhuematic to check the details about the actual funding for rhuematic fever, actual funding for rhuematic fever, but actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can tell actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can tell the actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can tell the member actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can tell the member dis actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can tell the member dis - actual funding for rhuematic fever, but I can tell the member dis - this but I can tell the member dis - this Government but I can tell the member dis - this Government set but I can tell the member dis - this Government set up but I can tell the member dis - this Government set up the but I can tell the member dis - this Government set up the rhuematic Government set up the rhuematic fever Government set up the rhuematic fever scheme, Government set up the rhuematic fever scheme, with Government set up the rhuematic fever scheme, with around Government set up the rhuematic fever scheme, with around - Government set up the rhuematic fever scheme, with around - with, Government set up the rhuematic fever scheme, with around - with, I fever scheme, with around - with, I think, fever scheme, with around - with, I think, $60 fever scheme, with around - with, I think, $60 million fever scheme, with around - with, I think, $60 million at fever scheme, with around - with, I think, $60 million at the fever scheme, with around - with, I think, $60 million at the time. fever scheme, with around - with, I think, $60 million at the time. It's think, $60 million at the time. It's been think, $60 million at the time. It's been innovative, think, $60 million at the time. It's been innovative, it's think, $60 million at the time. It's been innovative, it's had been innovative, it's had significant been innovative, it's had significant effect been innovative, it's had significant effect on been innovative, it's had significant effect on rhuematic significant effect on rhuematic fever significant effect on rhuematic fever rates, significant effect on rhuematic fever rates, and significant effect on rhuematic fever rates, and the significant effect on rhuematic fever rates, and the lessons significant effect on rhuematic fever rates, and the lessons from fever rates, and the lessons from that fever rates, and the lessons from that have fever rates, and the lessons from that have been fever rates, and the lessons from that have been applied fever rates, and the lessons from that have been applied to fever rates, and the lessons from that have been applied to the fever rates, and the lessons from that have been applied to the new, that have been applied to the new, better that have been applied to the new, better public that have been applied to the new, better public services that have been applied to the new, better public services result, better public services result, around better public services result, around reducing better public services result, around reducing hospital better public services result, around reducing hospital admissions around reducing hospital admissions for around reducing hospital admissions for children around reducing hospital admissions for children for around reducing hospital admissions for children for preventible for children for preventible conditions. for children for preventible conditions. So, for children for preventible conditions. So, essentially for children for preventible conditions. So, essentially we're conditions. So, essentially we're taking conditions. So, essentially we're taking the conditions. So, essentially we're taking the rhuematic conditions. So, essentially we're taking the rhuematic fever conditions. So, essentially we're taking the rhuematic fever scheme taking the rhuematic fever scheme and taking the rhuematic fever scheme and applying taking the rhuematic fever scheme and applying it taking the rhuematic fever scheme and applying it on taking the rhuematic fever scheme and applying it on a taking the rhuematic fever scheme and applying it on a much taking the rhuematic fever scheme and applying it on a much wider and applying it on a much wider basis and applying it on a much wider basis so and applying it on a much wider basis so that and applying it on a much wider basis so that we and applying it on a much wider basis so that we can and applying it on a much wider basis so that we can have and applying it on a much wider basis so that we can have more basis so that we can have more healthy basis so that we can have more healthy children basis so that we can have more healthy children and basis so that we can have more healthy children and fewer basis so that we can have more healthy children and fewer of basis so that we can have more healthy children and fewer of them healthy children and fewer of them going healthy children and fewer of them going to healthy children and fewer of them going to hospital. healthy children and fewer of them going to hospital. Well, healthy children and fewer of them going to hospital. Well, then, healthy children and fewer of them going to hospital. Well, then, does going to hospital. Well, then, does he going to hospital. Well, then, does he stand going to hospital. Well, then, does he stand by going to hospital. Well, then, does he stand by his going to hospital. Well, then, does he stand by his decision going to hospital. Well, then, does he stand by his decision - going to hospital. Well, then, does he stand by his decision - his he stand by his decision - his Government's he stand by his decision - his Government's decision he stand by his decision - his Government's decision in he stand by his decision - his Government's decision in last he stand by his decision - his Government's decision in last week's Government's decision in last week's Budget Government's decision in last week's Budget to Government's decision in last week's Budget to stop Government's decision in last week's Budget to stop insulating Government's decision in last week's Budget to stop insulating homes Government's decision in last week's Budget to stop insulating homes at Budget to stop insulating homes at the Budget to stop insulating homes at the end Budget to stop insulating homes at the end of Budget to stop insulating homes at the end of this Budget to stop insulating homes at the end of this year? Budget to stop insulating homes at the end of this year? The Budget to stop insulating homes at the end of this year? The law Budget to stop insulating homes at the end of this year? The law has the end of this year? The law has been the end of this year? The law has been passed the end of this year? The law has been passed precisely the end of this year? The law has been passed precisely to the end of this year? The law has been passed precisely to make the end of this year? The law has been passed precisely to make sure been passed precisely to make sure that been passed precisely to make sure that all been passed precisely to make sure that all homes been passed precisely to make sure that all homes are been passed precisely to make sure that all homes are insulated been passed precisely to make sure that all homes are insulated where that all homes are insulated where that that all homes are insulated where that is that all homes are insulated where that is reasonably that all homes are insulated where that is reasonably possible. that all homes are insulated where that is reasonably possible. I that all homes are insulated where that is reasonably possible. I can't that is reasonably possible. I can't - that is reasonably possible. I can't - all that is reasonably possible. I can't - all rental that is reasonably possible. I can't - all rental hopes. that is reasonably possible. I can't - all rental hopes. I that is reasonably possible. I can't - all rental hopes. I can't that is reasonably possible. I can't - all rental hopes. I can't help - all rental hopes. I can't help feeling - all rental hopes. I can't help feeling that - all rental hopes. I can't help feeling that the - all rental hopes. I can't help feeling that the Greens - all rental hopes. I can't help feeling that the Greens are - all rental hopes. I can't help feeling that the Greens are running feeling that the Greens are running into feeling that the Greens are running into the feeling that the Greens are running into the same feeling that the Greens are running into the same trap feeling that the Greens are running into the same trap as feeling that the Greens are running into the same trap as the feeling that the Greens are running into the same trap as the Labour into the same trap as the Labour Party, into the same trap as the Labour Party, and into the same trap as the Labour Party, and that into the same trap as the Labour Party, and that now into the same trap as the Labour Party, and that now they into the same trap as the Labour Party, and that now they have Party, and that now they have decided Party, and that now they have decided to Party, and that now they have decided to vote Party, and that now they have decided to vote against Party, and that now they have decided to vote against the decided to vote against the Government decided to vote against the Government on decided to vote against the Government on the decided to vote against the Government on the confidence decided to vote against the Government on the confidence motion Government on the confidence motion they Government on the confidence motion they are Government on the confidence motion they are trying Government on the confidence motion they are trying to Government on the confidence motion they are trying to find Government on the confidence motion they are trying to find reasons Government on the confidence motion they are trying to find reasons for they are trying to find reasons for that they are trying to find reasons for that vote. they are trying to find reasons for that vote. Can they are trying to find reasons for that vote. Can he they are trying to find reasons for that vote. Can he confirm they are trying to find reasons for that vote. Can he confirm that they are trying to find reasons for that vote. Can he confirm that the that vote. Can he confirm that the law that vote. Can he confirm that the law that that vote. Can he confirm that the law that he that vote. Can he confirm that the law that he just that vote. Can he confirm that the law that he just referred that vote. Can he confirm that the law that he just referred to that vote. Can he confirm that the law that he just referred to - that vote. Can he confirm that the law that he just referred to - the law that he just referred to - the change law that he just referred to - the change in law that he just referred to - the change in the law that he just referred to - the change in the insulation law that he just referred to - the change in the insulation standards change in the insulation standards that change in the insulation standards that the change in the insulation standards that the Government change in the insulation standards that the Government introduced change in the insulation standards that the Government introduced in that the Government introduced in 2016 that the Government introduced in that that the Government introduced in 2016 - is that the Government introduced in 2016 - is based that the Government introduced in 2016 - is based on that the Government introduced in 2016 - is based on 1978 that the Government introduced in 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, won't 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, won't come 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, won't come into 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, won't come into effect 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, won't come into effect for 2016 - is based on 1978 levels, won't come into effect for another won't come into effect for another two won't come into effect for another two years, won't come into effect for another two years, is won't come into effect for another two years, is lower won't come into effect for another two years, is lower than won't come into effect for another two years, is lower than the won't come into effect for another two years, is lower than the current two years, is lower than the current building two years, is lower than the current building code, two years, is lower than the current building code, and two years, is lower than the current building code, and lower two years, is lower than the current building code, and lower than building code, and lower than officials building code, and lower than officials recommend building code, and lower than officials recommend for building code, and lower than officials recommend for a building code, and lower than officials recommend for a healthy officials recommend for a healthy home? officials recommend for a healthy home? No. officials recommend for a healthy home? No. I officials recommend for a healthy home? No. I can't officials recommend for a healthy home? No. I can't confirm officials recommend for a healthy home? No. I can't confirm any officials recommend for a healthy home? No. I can't confirm any of home? No. I can't confirm any of those home? No. I can't confirm any of those things. home? No. I can't confirm any of those things. Well, home? No. I can't confirm any of those things. Well, has home? No. I can't confirm any of those things. Well, has he home? No. I can't confirm any of those things. Well, has he seen those things. Well, has he seen reports those things. Well, has he seen reports that those things. Well, has he seen reports that there those things. Well, has he seen reports that there are those things. Well, has he seen reports that there are still those things. Well, has he seen reports that there are still 600,000 reports that there are still 600,000 homes reports that there are still 600,000 home? reports that there are still 600,000 homes in this reports that there are still 600,000 homes in this country reports that there are still 600,000 homes in this country with reports that there are still 600,000 homes in this country with poor homes in this country with poor thermal homes in this country with poor thermal performance, homes in this country with poor thermal performance, which homes in this country with poor thermal performance, which are homes in this country with poor thermal performance, which are cold thermal performance, which are cold and thermal performance, which are cold and damp thermal performance, which are cold and damp in thermal performance, which are cold and damp in winter, thermal performance, which are cold and damp in winter, and thermal performance, which are cold and damp in winter, and which thermal performance, which are cold and damp in winter, and which make and damp in winter, and which make the and damp in winter, and which make the people and damp in winter, and which make the people who and damp in winter, and which make the people who live and damp in winter, and which make the people who live in and damp in winter, and which make the people who live in them and damp in winter, and which make the people who live in them sick? the people who live in them sick? Well, the people who live in them sick? Well, I the people who live in them sick? Well, I have the people who live in them sick? Well, I have seen the people who live in them sick? Well, I have seen all the people who live in them sick? Well, I have seen all sorts the people who live in them sick? Well, I have seen all sorts of Well, I have seen all sorts of reports Well, I have seen all sorts of reports about Well, I have seen all sorts of reports about the Well, I have seen all sorts of reports about the state Well, I have seen all sorts of reports about the state of Well, I have seen all sorts of reports about the state of our reports about the state of our housing reports about the state of our housing stock. reports about the state of our housing stock. That reports about the state of our housing stock. That is reports about the state of our housing stock. That is what reports about the state of our housing stock. That is what - reports about the state of our housing stock. That is what - and housing stock. That is what - and one housing stock. That is what - and one of housing stock. That is what - and one of the housing stock. That is what - and one of the reasons housing stock. That is what - and one of the reasons - housing stock. That is what - and one of the reasons - that housing stock. That is what - and one of the reasons - that is housing stock. That is what - and one of the reasons - that is one housing stock. That is what - and one of the reasons - that is one of one of the reasons - that is one of the one of the reasons - that is one of the reasons one of the reasons - that is one of the reasons why one of the reasons - that is one of the reasons why the one of the reasons - that is one of the reasons why the Government one of the reasons - that is one of the reasons why the Government has the reasons why the Government has legislated the reasons why the Government has legislated in the reasons why the Government has legislated in the the reasons why the Government has legislated in the way the reasons why the Government has legislated in the way that the reasons why the Government has legislated in the way that we the reasons why the Government has legislated in the way that we have legislated in the way that we have just legislated in the way that we have just described, legislated in the way that we have just described, and, legislated in the way that we have just described, and, also, legislated in the way that we have just described, and, also, a legislated in the way that we have just described, and, also, a reason just described, and, also, a reason why just described, and, also, a reason why we've just described, and, also, a reason why we've now just described, and, also, a reason why we've now put just described, and, also, a reason why we've now put in just described, and, also, a reason why we've now put in place just described, and, also, a reason why we've now put in place for just described, and, also, a reason why we've now put in place for the why we've now put in place for the first why we've now put in place for the first time why we've now put in place for the first time systems why we've now put in place for the first time systems for why we've now put in place for the first time systems for dealing why we've now put in place for the first time systems for dealing with first time systems for dealing with children, first time systems for dealing with children, in first time systems for dealing with children, in particular, first time systems for dealing with children, in particular, who first time systems for dealing with children, in particular, who show first time systems for dealing with children, in particular, who show up children, in particular, who show up in children, in particular, who show up in hospitals children, in particular, who show up in hospitals with children, in particular, who show up in hospitals with diseases children, in particular, who show up in hospitals with diseases that children, in particular, who show up in hospitals with diseases that may in hospitals with diseases that may be in hospitals with diseases that may be related in hospitals with diseases that may be related to in hospitals with diseases that may be related to the in hospitals with diseases that may be related to the poor in hospitals with diseases that may be related to the poor state in hospitals with diseases that may be related to the poor state of in hospitals with diseases that may be related to the poor state of the be related to the poor state of the house be related to the poor state of the house that be related to the poor state of the house that they be related to the poor state of the house that they are be related to the poor state of the house that they are in. be related to the poor state of the house that they are in. The be related to the poor state of the house that they are in. The good house that they are in. The good news house that they are in. The good news is house that they are in. The good news is that house that they are in. The good news is that more house that they are in. The good news is that more new house that they are in. The good news is that more new houses house that they are in. The good news is that more new houses are news is that more new houses are being news is that more new houses are being built news is that more new houses are being built than news is that more new houses are being built than ever. news is that more new houses are being built than ever. The news is that more new houses are being built than ever. The state being built than ever. The state housing being built than ever. The state housing stock being built than ever. The state housing stock has being built than ever. The state housing stock has been being built than ever. The state housing stock has been significantly housing stock has been significantly improved housing stock has been significantly housing housing stock has been significantly improved since this housing stock has been significantly improved since this Government housing stock has been significantly improved since this Government came improved since this Government came to improved since this Government came to office. improved since this Government came to office. The improved since this Government came to office. The standard improved since this Government came to office. The standard of improved since this Government came to office. The standard of houses improved since this Government came to office. The standard of houses in to office. The standard of houses in New to office. The standard of houses in New Zealand to office. The standard of houses in New Zealand is to office. The standard of houses in New Zealand is rising. to office. The standard of houses in New Zealand is rising. Does to office. The standard of houses in New Zealand is rising. Does he to office. The standard of houses in New Zealand is rising. Does he agree New Zealand is rising. Does he agree with New Zealand is rising. Does he agree with Otago New Zealand is rising. Does he agree with Otago University New Zealand is rising. Does he agree with Otago University professor New Zealand is rising. Does he agree with Otago University professor pill with Otago University professor pill la with Otago University professor pill with with Otago University professor pill la Chapman that with Otago University professor pill la Chapman that home with Otago University professor pill la Chapman that home Innes la Chapman that home Innes speculation la Chapman that home Innes speculation is la Chapman that home Innes speculation is a la Chapman that home Innes speculation is a good la Chapman that home Innes speculation is a good investment, speculation is a good investment, and speculation is a good investment, speculation speculation is a good investment, and if so speculation is a good investment, and if so why speculation is a good investment, and if so why isn't speculation is a good investment, and if so why isn't he speculation is a good investment, and if so why isn't he funding speculation is a good investment, and if so why isn't he funding it and if so why isn't he funding it under and if so why isn't he funding it under his and if so why isn't he funding it under his social and if so why isn't he funding it under his social investment under his social investment programme? under his social investment programme? It under his social investment programme? It is under his social investment programme? It is a under his social investment programme? It is a good under his social investment programme? It is a good investment! programme? It is a good investment! Well, programme? It is a good investment! Well, Mr programme? It is a good investment! Well, Mr Speaker, programme? It is a good investment! Well, Mr Speaker, as programme? It is a good investment! Well, Mr Speaker, as the programme? It is a good investment! Well, Mr Speaker, as the member programme? It is a good investment! Well, Mr Speaker, as the member may Well, Mr Speaker, as the member may be Well, Mr Speaker, as the member may be aware, Well, Mr Speaker, as the member may be aware, the Well, Mr Speaker, as the member may be aware, the Government Well, Mr Speaker, as the member may be aware, the Government spend be aware, the Government spend hundreds be aware, the Government spend hundreds of be aware, the Government spend hundreds of millions be aware, the Government spend hundreds of millions on be aware, the Government spend hundreds of millions on subsidising hundreds of millions on subsidising the hundreds of millions on subsidising the insulation hundreds of millions on subsidising the insulation of hundreds of millions on subsidising the insulation of homes, hundreds of millions on subsidising the insulation of homes, and hundreds of millions on subsidising the insulation of homes, and have the insulation of homes, and have come the insulation of homes, and have hundreds the insulation of homes, and have come to the the insulation of homes, and have come to the view the insulation of homes, and have come to the view that the insulation of homes, and have come to the view that the the insulation of homes, and have come to the view that the best the insulation of homes, and have come to the view that the best thing come to the view that the best thing from come to the view that the best thing from here come to the view that the best thing from here is come to the view that the best thing from here is to come to the view that the best thing from here is to make come to the view that the best thing from here is to make it come to the view that the best thing from here is to make it a from here is to make it a requirement from here is to make it a requirement for from here is to make it a requirement for all from here is to make it a requirement for all those from here is to make it a requirement for all those who from here is to make it a requirement for all those who do from here is to make it a requirement for all those who do own requirement for all those who do own rental requirement for all those who do own rental homes requirement for all those who do own rental homes to requirement for all those who do own rental homes to insulate requirement for all those who do own rental homes to insulate them. requirement for all those who do own rental homes to insulate them. It rental homes to insulate them. It seemed rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to me rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to me in rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to me in the rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to me in the same rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to me in the same way rental homes to insulate them. It seemed to me in the same way we seemed to me in the same way we don't seemed to me in the same way we don't spend seemed to me in the same way we don't spend money seemed to me in the same way we don't spend money subsidising seemed to me in the same way we don't spend money subsidising the don't spend money subsidising the spouting don't spend money subsidising the spouting or don't spend money subsidising the spouting or hanging don't spend money subsidising the spouting or hanging doors don't spend money subsidising the spouting or hanging doors in don't spend money subsidising the spouting or hanging doors in homes. spouting or hanging doors in homes. They spouting or hanging doors in homes. They should spouting or hanging doors in homes. They should be spouting or hanging doors in homes. They should be an spouting or hanging doors in homes. They should be an integral spouting or hanging doors in homes. They should be an integral part spouting or hanging doors in homes. They should be an integral part of They should be an integral part of the They should be an integral part of the standard They should be an integral part of the standard of They should be an integral part of the standard of the They should be an integral part of the standard of the home. They should be an integral part of the standard of the home. If They should be an integral part of the standard of the home. If a They should be an integral part of the standard of the home. If a 6 They should be an integral part of the standard of the home. If a 6 to the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 benefit the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 benefit cost the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 benefit cost ratio the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 benefit cost ratio to the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle the standard of the home. If a 6 to 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a problem 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a problem that 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a problem that puts 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a problem that puts kids 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a problem that puts kids in 1 benefit cost ratio to tackle a problem that puts kids in hospital problem that puts kids in hospital 40,000 problem that puts kids in hospital 40,000 times problem that puts kids in hospital 40,000 times and problem that puts kids in hospital 40,000 times and kills problem that puts kids in hospital 40,000 times and kills more problem that puts kids in hospital 40,000 times and kills more people 40,000 times and kills more people than 40,000 times and kills more people than the 40,000 times and kills more people than the road 40,000 times and kills more people than the road toll 40,000 times and kills more people than the road toll every 40,000 times and kills more people than the road toll every year, than the road toll every year, doesn't than the road toll every year, doesn't meet than the road toll every year, doesn't meet the than the road toll every year, doesn't meet the criteria than the road toll every year, doesn't meet the criteria to than the road toll every year, doesn't meet the criteria to be doesn't meet the criteria to be considered doesn't meet the criteria to be considered a doesn't meet the criteria to be considered a good doesn't meet the criteria to be considered a good social doesn't meet the criteria to be considered a good social investment, considered a good social investment, what considered a good social investment, considered considered a good social investment, what does? Well, considered a good social investment, what does? Well, there's considered a good social investment, what does? Well, there's lots considered a good social investment, what does? Well, there's lots of what does? Well, there's lots of proposals what does? Well, there's lots of proposals that what does? Well, there's lots of proposals that meet what does? Well, there's lots of proposals that meet the what does? Well, there's lots of proposals that meet the criteria what does? Well, there's lots of proposals that meet the criteria for proposals that meet the criteria for sound proposals that meet the criteria for sound social proposals that meet the criteria for sound social investment, proposals that meet the criteria for sound social investment, but proposals that meet the criteria for sound social investment, but as proposals that meet the criteria for sound social investment, but as I sound social investment, but as I have sound social investment, but as I have already sound social investment, but as I have already explained sound social investment, but as I have already explained to sound social investment, but as I have already explained to the have already explained to the member, have already explained to the member, because have already explained to the member, because of have already explained to the member, because of the have already explained to the member, because of the significance member, because of the significance of member, because of the significance member, member, because of the significance of Innes speculation, member, because of the significance of Innes speculation, we member, because of the significance of Innes speculation, we have member, because of the significance of Innes speculation, we have ledge of Innes speculation, we have ledge -- of Innes speculation, we have ledge -- insulation, of Innes speculation, we have ledge -- insulation, we of Innes speculation, we have ledge -- insulation, we are of Innes speculation, we have ledge -- insulation, we are legislated of Innes speculation, we have ledge -- insulation, we are legislated to -- insulation, we are legislated to require -- insulation, we are legislated to require - -- insulation, we are legislated to require - to -- insulation, we are legislated to require - to require -- insulation, we are legislated to require - to require insulation -- insulation, we are legislated to require - to require insulation to -- insulation, we are legislated to require - to require insulation to a require - to require insulation to a specific require - to require insulation to a specific level require - to require insulation to a specific level in require - to require insulation to a specific level in all require - to require insulation to a specific level in all rental require - to require insulation to a specific level in all rental homes. Question Question No. Question No. 4. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister of My question is to the Minister of Health: My question is to the Minister of Health: Can My question is to the Minister of Health: Can he My question is to the Minister of Health: Can he confirm My question is to the Minister of Health: Can he confirm that My question is to the Minister of Health: Can he confirm that Budget Health: Can he confirm that Budget 2017 Health: Can he confirm that Budget 2017 will Health: Can he confirm that Budget 2017 will invest Health: Can he confirm that Budget 2017 will invest an Health: Can he confirm that Budget 2017 will invest an extra Health: Can he confirm that Budget 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 billion 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 billion over 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 billion over four 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 billion over four years 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 billion over four years into 2017 will invest an extra $3.9 billion over four years into Vote billion over four years into Vote Health, billion over four years into Vote Health, taking billion over four years into Vote Health, taking the billion over four years into Vote Health, taking the total billion over four years into Vote Health, taking the total health Health, taking the total health investment Health, taking the total health investment to Health, taking the total health investment to $16.77 Health, taking the total health investment to $16.77 billion Health, taking the total health investment to $16.77 billion in investment to $16.77 billion in 2017/18? Yes, Yes, indeed. Yes, indeed. Delivering Yes, indeed. Delivering better Yes, indeed. Delivering better health Yes, indeed. Delivering better health services Yes, indeed. Delivering better health services for Yes, indeed. Delivering better health services for a Yes, indeed. Delivering better health services for a growing health services for a growing population health services for a growing population remains health services for a growing population remains this health services for a growing population remains this Government's population remains this Government's number population remains this Government's number 1 population remains this Government's number 1 funding population remains this Government's number 1 funding priority population remains this Government's number 1 funding priority that population remains this Government's number 1 funding priority that end number 1 funding priority that end is number 1 funding priority that end is reflected number 1 funding priority that end is reflected in number 1 funding priority that end is reflected in Budget number 1 funding priority that end is reflected in Budget 2017. number 1 funding priority that end is reflected in Budget 2017. The is reflected in Budget 2017. The additional is reflected in Budget 2017. The additional funding is reflected in Budget 2017. The additional funding will is reflected in Budget 2017. The additional funding will deliver is reflected in Budget 2017. The additional funding will deliver a additional funding will deliver a range additional funding will deliver a range of additional funding will deliver a range of new additional funding will deliver a range of new initiatives additional funding will deliver a range of new initiatives to additional funding will deliver a range of new initiatives to meet range of new initiatives to meet cost range of new initiatives to meet cost pressures range of new initiatives to meet cost pressures as range of new initiatives to meet cost pressures as well range of new initiatives to meet cost pressures as well as range of new initiatives to meet cost pressures as well as population cost pressures as well as population growth cost pressures as well as population growth including cost pressures as well as population growth including an cost pressures as well as population growth including an extra cost pressures as well as population growth including an extra $1.6 growth including an extra $1.6 billion growth including an extra $1.6 billion over growth including an extra $1.6 billion over four growth including an extra $1.6 billion over four years growth including an extra $1.6 billion over four years for growth including an extra $1.6 billion over four years for DHB billion over four years for DHB services billion over four years for DHB services to billion over four years for DHB services to improve billion over four years for DHB services to improve services billion over four years for DHB services to improve services and services to improve services and improve services to improve services and improve access. services to improve services and improve access. How services to improve services and improve access. How much services to improve services and improve access. How much has services to improve services and improve access. How much has health improve access. How much has health funding improve access. How much has health funding increased improve access. How much has health funding increased in improve access. How much has health funding increased in recent improve access. How much has health funding increased in recent years? funding increased in recent years? An funding increased in recent years? An extra funding increased in recent years? An extra $888 funding increased in recent years? An extra $888 million funding increased in recent years? An extra $888 million is funding increased in recent years? An extra $888 million is being An extra $888 million is being invested An extra $888 million is being invested into An extra $888 million is being invested into health An extra $888 million is being invested into health services An extra $888 million is being invested into health services for invested into health services for 2017/18 invested into health services for 2017/18 and invested into health services for 2017/18 and that invested into health services for 2017/18 and that is invested into health services for 2017/18 and that is the invested into health services for 2017/18 and that is the biggest 2017/18 and that is the biggest increase 2017/18 and that is the biggest increase in 2017/18 and that is the biggest increase in 11 2017/18 and that is the biggest increase in 11 years. 2017/18 and that is the biggest increase in 11 years. The 2017/18 and that is the biggest increase in 11 years. The total increase in 11 years. The total health increase in 11 years. The total health investment increase in 11 years. The total health investment is increase in 11 years. The total health investment is $16.77 increase in 11 years. The total health investment is $16.77 billion health investment is $16.77 billion in health investment is $16.77 billion in 2017/18 health investment is $16.77 billion in 2017/18 and health investment is $16.77 billion in 2017/18 and that's health investment is $16.77 billion in 2017/18 and that's an health investment is $16.77 billion in 2017/18 and that's an increase health investment is $16.77 billion in 2017/18 and that's an increase of in 2017/18 and that's an increase of around in 2017/18 and that's an increase of around $5 in 2017/18 and that's an increase of around $5 billion in 2017/18 and that's an increase of around $5 billion across in 2017/18 and that's an increase of around $5 billion across our in 2017/18 and that's an increase of around $5 billion across our 9 around $5 billion across our 9 Budgets. around $5 billion across our 9 Budgets. None around $5 billion across our 9 Budgets. None of around $5 billion across our 9 Budgets. None of this around $5 billion across our 9 Budgets. None of this would around $5 billion across our 9 Budgets. None of this would have Budgets. None of this would have Budgets. None of this would have Budgets. None of this would have been possible Budgets. None of this would have been possible without Budgets. None of this would have been possible without the Budgets. None of this would have been possible without the steady been possible without the steady management been possible without the steady management of been possible without the steady management of the been possible without the steady management of the economy, been possible without the steady management of the economy, which been possible without the steady management of the economy, which has management of the economy, which has allowed management of the economy, which has allowed us management of the economy, which has allowed us to management of the economy, which has allowed us to maintain management of the economy, which has allowed us to maintain sustainable allowed us to maintain sustainable investment allowed us to maintain sustainable investment into allowed us to maintain sustainable investment into our allowed us to maintain sustainable investment into our health allowed us to maintain sustainable investment into our health services. investment into our health services. Is investment into our health services. Is the investment into our health services. Is the reason investment into our health services. Is the reason he investment into our health services. Is the reason he prefers investment into our health services. Is the reason he prefers to investment into our health services. Is the reason he prefers to ad investment into our health services. Is the reason he prefers to ad four Is the reason he prefers to ad four years Is the reason he prefers to ad four years of Is the reason he prefers to ad four years of health Is the reason he prefers to ad four years of health spending Is the reason he prefers to ad four years of health spending because Is the reason he prefers to ad four years of health spending because he years of health spending because he only years of health spending because he only gave years of health spending because he only gave DHBs years of health spending because he only gave DHBs $439 years of health spending because he only gave DHBs $439 million years of health spending because he only gave DHBs $439 million for only gave DHBs $439 million for 2017/18 only gave DHBs $439 million for 2017/18 when only gave DHBs $439 million for 2017/18 when his only gave DHBs $439 million for 2017/18 when his officials only gave DHBs $439 million for 2017/18 when his officials told only gave DHBs $439 million for 2017/18 when his officials told him 2017/18 when his officials told him that 2017/18 when his officials told him that the 2017/18 when his officials told him that the total 2017/18 when his officials told him that the total cost 2017/18 when his officials told him that the total cost pressures 2017/18 when his officials told him that the total cost pressures for that the total cost pressures for DHBs that the total cost pressures for DHBs were that the total cost pressures for DHBs were $644 that the total cost pressures for DHBs were $644 million that the total cost pressures for DHBs were $644 million in that the total cost pressures for DHBs were $644 million in the that the total cost pressures for DHBs were $644 million in the last DHBs were $644 million in the last DHBs were $644 million in the last DHBs were $644 million in the last year alone? DHBs were $644 million in the last year alone? No, DHBs were $644 million in the last year alone? No, I DHBs were $644 million in the last year alone? No, I believe DHBs were $644 million in the last year alone? No, I believe the DHBs were $644 million in the last year alone? No, I believe the 4-year year alone? No, I believe the 4-year total year alone? No, I believe the 4-year total convention year alone? No, I believe the 4-year total convention was year alone? No, I believe the 4-year total convention was started year alone? No, I believe the 4-year total convention was started by year alone? No, I believe the 4-year total convention was started by Dr total convention was started by Dr Michael total convention was started by Dr Michael Cullen total convention was started by Dr Michael Cullen and total convention was started by Dr Michael Cullen and this total convention was started by Dr Michael Cullen and this Government's Michael Cullen and this Government's continued Michael Cullen and this Government's continued with Michael Cullen and this Government's continued with that. Michael Cullen and this Government's continued with that. A Michael Cullen and this Government's continued with that. A point Michael Cullen and this Government's continued with that. A point of continued with that. A point of order. continued with that. A point of order. I continued with that. A point of order. I seek continued with that. A point of order. I seek leave continued with that. A point of order. I seek leave to continued with that. A point of order. I seek leave to table continued with that. A point of order. I seek leave to table a continued with that. A point of order. I seek leave to table a paper order. I seek leave to table a paper saying order. I seek leave to table a paper saying that order. I seek leave to table a paper saying that his order. I seek leave to table a paper saying that his ministry order. I seek leave to table a paper saying that his ministry advices saying that his ministry advices saying that his ministry advices saying that his ministry advices according to saying that his ministry advices according to democratic saying that his ministry advices according to democratic pressure. according to democratic pressure. Where according to democratic pressure. Where is according to democratic pressure. Where is it according to democratic pressure. Where is it from? according to democratic pressure. Where is it from? It according to democratic pressure. Where is it from? It is according to democratic pressure. Where is it from? It is an according to democratic pressure. Where is it from? It is an OIA Where is it from? It is an OIA response. Where is it from? It is an OIA response. Is Where is it from? It is an OIA response. Is there Where is it from? It is an OIA response. Is there any Where is it from? It is an OIA response. Is there any objection Where is it from? It is an OIA response. Is there any objection to response. Is there any objection to it response. Is there any objection to it being response. Is there any objection to it being tabled? response. Is there any objection to it being tabled? There response. Is there any objection to it being tabled? There is response. Is there any objection to it being tabled? There is not. response. Is there any objection to it being tabled? There is not. It it being tabled? There is not. It can it being tabled? There is not. It can be it being tabled? There is not. It can be tabled. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister of My question is to the Minister of Finance: My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by all My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by all his Finance: Does he stand by all his statements Finance: Does he stand by all his statements on Finance: Does he stand by all his statements on the Finance: Does he stand by all his statements on the health Finance: Does he stand by all his statements on the health of Yes, Yes, particularly Yes, particularly my Yes, particularly my statement Yes, particularly my statement during Yes, particularly my statement during last Yes, particularly my statement during last week's Yes, particularly my statement during last week's Budget Yes, particularly my statement during last week's Budget speech during last week's Budget speech during last week's Budget speech during last week's Budget speech where I during last week's Budget speech where I said, during last week's Budget speech where I said, "A during last week's Budget speech where I said, "A strong during last week's Budget speech where I said, "A strong economy during last week's Budget speech where I said, "A strong economy can where I said, "A strong economy can where I said, "A strong economy can where I said, "A strong economy can never be where I said, "A strong economy can never be taken where I said, "A strong economy can never be taken for where I said, "A strong economy can never be taken for granted. where I said, "A strong economy can never be taken for granted. It where I said, "A strong economy can never be taken for granted. It must never be taken for granted. It must be never be taken for granted. It must be nutured never be taken for granted. It must be nutured and never be taken for granted. It must be nutured and worked never be taken for granted. It must be nutured and worked on never be taken for granted. It must be nutured and worked on or never be taken for granted. It must be nutured and worked on or it never be taken for granted. It must be nutured and worked on or it will be nutured and worked on or it will quickly be nutured and worked on or it will quickly go be nutured and worked on or it will quickly go backwards. be nutured and worked on or it will quickly go backwards. While be nutured and worked on or it will quickly go backwards. While the quickly go backwards. While the world quickly go backwards. While the world economy quickly go backwards. While the world economy is quickly go backwards. While the world economy is growing quickly go backwards. While the world economy is growing there quickly go backwards. While the world economy is growing there are world economy is growing there are plenty world economy is growing there are plenty of world economy is growing there are plenty of risks world economy is growing there are plenty of risks and world economy is growing there are plenty of risks and political plenty of risks and political uncertainties plenty of risks and political uncertainties that plenty of risks and political uncertainties that could plenty of risks and political uncertainties that could affect plenty of risks and political uncertainties that could affect us. uncertainties that could affect us. uncertainties that could affect us. uncertainties that could affect us. " If, uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as he uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as he told uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as he told Q&A uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as he told Q&A on uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as he told Q&A on Sunday uncertainties that could affect us. " If, as he told Q&A on Sunday this " If, as he told Q&A on Sunday this our " If, as he told Q&A on Sunday this our economy, " If, as he told Q&A on Sunday this our economy, "Is " If, as he told Q&A on Sunday this our economy, "Is performing our economy, "Is performing Australia our economy, "Is performing Australia a our economy, "Is performing Australia a country our economy, "Is performing Australia a country a our economy, "Is performing Australia a country a lot our economy, "Is performing Australia a country a lot better Australia a country a lot better than Australia a country a lot better than the Australia a country a lot better than the UK, Australia a country a lot better than the UK, the Australia a country a lot better than the UK, the US, Australia a country a lot better than the UK, the US, Australia, than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada and than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada and Europe" than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada and Europe" which than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada and Europe" which is than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada and Europe" which is not than the UK, the US, Australia, Canada and Europe" which is not a Canada and Europe" which is not a country Canada and Europe" which is not a country but Canada and Europe" which is not a country but he Canada and Europe" which is not a country but he said Canada and Europe" which is not a country but he said it Canada and Europe" which is not a country but he said it was, Canada and Europe" which is not a country but he said it was, "And country but he said it was, "And Japan country but he said it was, "And Japan at country but he said it was, "And Japan at the country but he said it was, "And Japan at the moment", country but he said it was, "And Japan at the moment", which country but he said it was, "And Japan at the moment", which of country but he said it was, "And Japan at the moment", which of these Japan at the moment", which of these economies' Japan at the moment", which of these economies' GDP Japan at the moment", which of these economies' GDP growth Japan at the moment", which of these economies' GDP growth is Japan at the moment", which of these economies' GDP growth is based Japan at the moment", which of these economies' GDP growth is based main economies' GDP growth is based main mainly economies' GDP growth is based main mainly en economies' GDP growth is based main mainly en masse economies' GDP growth is based main mainly en masse consumption economies' GDP growth is based main mainly en masse consumption like economies' GDP growth is based main mainly en masse consumption like our mainly en masse consumption like our GDP mainly en masse consumption like our GDP growth mainly en masse consumption like our GDP growth is. mainly en masse consumption like our GDP growth is. The mainly en masse consumption like our GDP growth is. The member mainly en masse consumption like our GDP growth is. The member is mainly en masse consumption like our GDP growth is. The member is simply GDP growth is. The member is simply incorrect. GDP growth is. The member is simply incorrect. The GDP growth is. The member is simply incorrect. The reason GDP growth is. The member is simply incorrect. The reason this GDP growth is. The member is simply incorrect. The reason this country incorrect. The reason this country is incorrect. The reason this country is growing incorrect. The reason this country is growing is incorrect. The reason this country is growing is because incorrect. The reason this country is growing is because we incorrect. The reason this country is growing is because we have incorrect. The reason this country is growing is because we have strong is growing is because we have strong Kiwi is growing is because we have strong Kiwi businesses is growing is because we have strong Kiwi businesses that is growing is because we have strong Kiwi businesses that are is growing is because we have strong Kiwi businesses that are working Kiwi businesses that are working hard Kiwi businesses that are working hard and Kiwi businesses that are working hard and getting Kiwi businesses that are working hard and getting out Kiwi businesses that are working hard and getting out there Kiwi businesses that are working hard and getting out there and hard and getting out there and selling hard and getting out there and selling their hard and getting out there and selling their goods hard and getting out there and selling their goods and hard and getting out there and selling their goods and services hard and getting out there and selling their goods and services on selling their goods and services on the selling their goods and services on the world selling their goods and services on the world stage selling their goods and services on the world stage and selling their goods and services on the world stage and that selling their goods and services on the world stage and that is the world stage and that is resulting the world stage and that is resulting in the world stage and that is resulting in New the world stage and that is resulting in New Zealand the world stage and that is resulting in New Zealand becoming resulting in New Zealand becoming more resulting in New Zealand becoming more attractive resulting in New Zealand becoming more attractive in resulting in New Zealand becoming more attractive in very resulting in New Zealand becoming more attractive in very high resulting in New Zealand becoming more attractive in very high levels more attractive in very high levels of more attractive in very high levels of employment, more attractive in very high levels of employment, so more attractive in very high levels of employment, so we more attractive in very high levels of employment, so we need more attractive in very high levels of employment, so we need to more attractive in very high levels of employment, so we need to attract of employment, so we need to attract more of employment, so we need to attract more skilled of employment, so we need to attract more skilled workers. of employment, so we need to attract more skilled workers. The of employment, so we need to attract more skilled workers. The member of employment, so we need to attract more skilled workers. The member may more skilled workers. The member may want more skilled workers. The member may want to more skilled workers. The member may want to slow more skilled workers. The member may want to slow down more skilled workers. The member may want to slow down the more skilled workers. The member may want to slow down the New more skilled workers. The member may want to slow down the New Zealand want to slow down the New Zealand economy want to slow down the New Zealand economy because want to slow down the New Zealand economy because it want to slow down the New Zealand economy because it is want to slow down the New Zealand economy because it is going want to slow down the New Zealand economy because it is going a want to slow down the New Zealand economy because it is going a little economy because it is going a little bit economy because it is going a little bit too economy because it is going a little bit too quickly economy because it is going a little bit too quickly for economy because it is going a little bit too quickly for him, economy because it is going a little bit too quickly for him, but bit too quickly for him, but actually, bit too quickly for him, but actually, I bit too quickly for him, but actually, I think, bit too quickly for him, but actually, I think, most bit too quickly for him, but actually, I think, most people bit too quickly for him, but actually, I think, most people are actually, I think, most people are actually actually, I think, most people are actually positive actually, I think, most people are actually positive about actually, I think, most people are actually positive about the actually, I think, most people are actually positive about the benefits actually positive about the benefits of actually positive about the benefits of economic actually positive about the benefits of economic growth actually positive about the benefits of economic growth in actually positive about the benefits of economic growth in terms actually positive about the benefits of economic growth in terms of actually positive about the benefits of economic growth in terms of wages of economic growth in terms of wages and of economic growth in terms of wages and increasing of economic growth in terms of wages and increasing incomes. of economic growth in terms of wages and increasing incomes. If of economic growth in terms of wages and increasing incomes. If there of economic growth in terms of wages and increasing incomes. If there is and increasing incomes. If there is the and increasing incomes. If there is the remotest and increasing incomes. If there is the remotest shred and increasing incomes. If there is the remotest shred of and increasing incomes. If there is the remotest shred of evidence and increasing incomes. If there is the remotest shred of evidence of the remotest shred of evidence of that the remotest shred of evidence of that being the remotest shred of evidence of that being true, the remotest shred of evidence of that being true, why the remotest shred of evidence of that being true, why did the remotest shred of evidence of that being true, why did Reserve that being true, why did Reserve Bank that being true, why did Reserve Bank Governor, that being true, why did Reserve Bank Governor, Governor that being true, why did Reserve Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that the Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that the GDP Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that the GDP growth Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that the GDP growth is Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that the GDP growth is a Bank Governor, Governor Wheeler agree that the GDP growth is a sham agree that the GDP growth is a sham agree that the GDP growth is a sham agree that the GDP growth is a sham once immigration agree that the GDP growth is a sham once immigration growth agree that the GDP growth is a sham once immigration growth is once immigration growth is once immigration growth is once immigration growth is subtracted when once immigration growth is subtracted when he once immigration growth is subtracted when he said, once immigration growth is subtracted when he said, "If once immigration growth is subtracted when he said, "If where subtracted when he said, "If where you subtracted when he said, "If where you are subtracted when he said, "If where you are going subtracted when he said, "If where you are going is subtracted when he said, "If where you are going is saying subtracted when he said, "If where you are going is saying in subtracted when he said, "If where you are going is saying in terms subtracted when he said, "If where you are going is saying in terms of you are going is saying in terms of GDP you are going is saying in terms of GDP per you are going is saying in terms of GDP per capita you are going is saying in terms of GDP per capita growth, you are going is saying in terms of GDP per capita growth, it you are going is saying in terms of GDP per capita growth, it is you are going is saying in terms of GDP per capita growth, it is a you are going is saying in terms of GDP per capita growth, it is a lot GDP per capita growth, it is a lot less GDP per capita growth, it is a lot less impressive, GDP per capita growth, it is a lot less impressive, that GDP per capita growth, it is a lot less impressive, that is GDP per capita growth, it is a lot less impressive, that is indeed GDP per capita growth, it is a lot less impressive, that is indeed the less impressive, that is indeed the correct less impressive, that is indeed the correct just less impressive, that is indeed the correct just like less impressive, that is indeed the correct just like the less impressive, that is indeed the correct just like the rate less impressive, that is indeed the correct just like the rate of less impressive, that is indeed the correct just like the rate of GDP correct just like the rate of GDP growth correct just like the rate of GDP growth in correct just like the rate of GDP growth in the correct just like the rate of GDP growth in the country correct just like the rate of GDP growth in the country is growth in the country is disappointing." growth in the country is disappointing." ? growth in the country is disappointing." ? I growth in the country is disappointing." ? I wasn't growth in the country is disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar with disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar with Mr disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar with Mr Wheeler's disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar with Mr Wheeler's comments disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar with Mr Wheeler's comments but disappointing." ? I wasn't familiar with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure he with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure he is with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure he is not with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure he is not the with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure he is not the sort with Mr Wheeler's comments but I'm pretty sure he is not the sort of pretty sure he is not the sort of pretty sure he is not the sort of pretty sure he is not the sort of person to pretty sure he is not the sort of person to use pretty sure he is not the sort of person to use the pretty sure he is not the sort of person to use the short pretty sure he is not the sort of person to use the short "sham", pretty sure he is not the sort of person to use the short "sham", I person to use the short "sham", I think person to use the short "sham", I think the person to use the short "sham", I think the sham person to use the short "sham", I think the sham here person to use the short "sham", I think the sham here is person to use the short "sham", I think the sham here is Mr person to use the short "sham", I think the sham here is Mr Peters' think the sham here is Mr Peters' comments think the sham here is Mr Peters' comments about think the sham here is Mr Peters' comments about whether think the sham here is Mr Peters' comments about whether Wheeler's comments about whether Wheeler's comments. comments about whether Wheeler's comments. In comments about whether Wheeler's comments. In terms comments about whether Wheeler's comments. In terms of comments about whether Wheeler's comments. In terms of the comments about whether Wheeler's comments. In terms of the question comments. In terms of the question about comments. In terms of the question about GDP comments. In terms of the question about GDP growth comments. In terms of the question about GDP growth per comments. In terms of the question about GDP growth per capita comments. In terms of the question about GDP growth per capita I'm about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased to about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased to report about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased to report to about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased to report to the about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased to report to the member about GDP growth per capita I'm pleased to report to the member that pleased to report to the member that the pleased to report to the member that the forecast pleased to report to the member that the forecast from pleased to report to the member that the forecast from Treasury pleased to report to the member that the forecast from Treasury in pleased to report to the member that the forecast from Treasury in the the forecast from Treasury in the Budget the forecast from Treasury in the Budget indicates the forecast from Treasury in the Budget indicates a the forecast from Treasury in the Budget indicates a GDP the forecast from Treasury in the Budget indicates a GDP per the forecast from Treasury in the Budget indicates a GDP per capita Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of above Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of above 1, Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of above 1, heading Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of above 1, heading up Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of above 1, heading up to Budget indicates a GDP per capita growth of above 1, heading up to 2% growth of above 1, heading up to 2% in growth of above 1, heading up to 2% in different growth of above 1, heading up to 2% in different years growth of above 1, heading up to 2% in different years in growth of above 1, heading up to 2% in different years in the growth of above 1, heading up to 2% in different years in the years in different years in the years ahead. in different years in the years ahead. It in different years in the years ahead. It is in different years in the years ahead. It is a in different years in the years ahead. It is a solid in different years in the years ahead. It is a solid GDP in different years in the years ahead. It is a solid GDP per in different years in the years ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita growth. ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita growth. The ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita growth. The member ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita growth. The member raises ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita growth. The member raises a ahead. It is a solid GDP per capita growth. The member raises a good growth. The member raises a good question growth. The member raises a good question about growth. The member raises a good question about productivity question about productivity and question about productivity question about productivity and that's why question about productivity and that's why the question about productivity and that's why the Government question about productivity and that's why the Government invests question about productivity and that's why the Government invests so that's why the Government invests so heavily that's why the Government invests so heavily in that's why the Government invests so heavily in the that's why the Government invests so heavily in the Innovative that's why the Government invests so heavily in the Innovative New heavily in the Innovative New Zealand heavily in the Innovative New heavily heavily in the Innovative New Zealand programme that heavily in the Innovative New Zealand programme that is heavily in the Innovative New Zealand programme that is all heavily in the Innovative New Zealand programme that is all about Zealand programme that is all about lifts Zealand programme that is all about lifts levelling Zealand programme that is all about lifts levelling of Zealand programme that is all about lifts levelling of research lifts levelling of research development lifts levelling of research development and lifts levelling of research development and skill lifts levelling of research development and skill development lifts levelling of research development and skill development to development and skill development to development and skill development to development and skill development to help lift development and skill development to help lift productivity development and skill development to help lift productivity over development and skill development to help lift productivity over time. development and skill development to help lift productivity over time. If help lift productivity over time. If that's help lift productivity over time. If that's true, help lift productivity over time. If that's true, why help lift productivity over time. If that's true, why then help lift productivity over time. If that's true, why then did help lift productivity over time. If that's true, why then did Page help lift productivity over time. If that's true, why then did Page 10 help lift productivity over time. If that's true, why then did Page 10 of that's true, why then did Page 10 of the that's true, why then did Page 10 of the Budget that's true, why then did Page 10 of the Budget fiscal that's true, why then did Page 10 of the Budget fiscal and that's true, why then did Page 10 of the Budget fiscal and economic the Budget fiscal and economic outlook the Budget fiscal and economic outlook state, the Budget fiscal and economic outlook state, "We the Budget fiscal and economic outlook state, "We are the Budget fiscal and economic outlook state, "We are growing outlook state, "We are growing because outlook state, "We are growing because of outlook state, "We are growing because of open outlook state, "We are growing because of open door outlook state, "We are growing because of open door immigration" outlook state, "We are growing because of open door immigration" - because of open door immigration" - their because of open door immigration" - their words, because of open door immigration" - their words, not because of open door immigration" - their words, not mine because of open door immigration" - their words, not mine - because of open door immigration" - their words, not mine - or because of open door immigration" - their words, not mine - or very their words, not mine - or very respected their words, not mine - or very respected company their words, not mine - or very respected company director their words, not mine - or very respected company director Kerry respected company director Kerry McDonald respected company director Kerry McDonald criticised respected company director Kerry McDonald criticised unplanned respected company director Kerry McDonald criticised unplanned mass McDonald criticised unplanned mass migration McDonald criticised unplanned mass migration and McDonald criticised unplanned mass migration and the McDonald criticised unplanned mass migration and the effect McDonald criticised unplanned mass migration and the effect it McDonald criticised unplanned mass migration and the effect it is migration and the effect it is having migration and the effect it is having on migration and the effect it is having on real migration and the effect it is having on real export migration and the effect it is having on real export growth, having on real export growth, housing having on real export growth, housing affordability, having on real export growth, housing affordability, low having on real export growth, housing affordability, low wages having on real export growth, housing affordability, low wages and housing affordability, low wages and labour housing affordability, low wages and labour productivity? housing affordability, low wages and labour productivity? Kerry housing affordability, low wages and labour productivity? Kerry is labour productivity? Kerry is labour productivity? Kerry is labour productivity? Kerry is respected, particularly labour productivity? Kerry is respected, particularly by labour productivity? Kerry is respected, particularly by the respected, particularly by the member, respected, particularly by the member, but respected, particularly by the member, but in respected, particularly by the member, but in terms respected, particularly by the member, but in terms of respected, particularly by the member, but in terms of our growth member, but in terms of our growth can member, but in terms of our growth can I member, but in terms of our growth can I just member, but in terms of our growth can I just make member, but in terms of our growth can I just make the member, but in terms of our growth can I just make the following member, but in terms of our growth can I just make the following point can I just make the following point to can I just make the following point to him. can I just make the following point to him. We can I just make the following point to him. We have can I just make the following point to him. We have in can I just make the following point to him. We have in this can I just make the following point to him. We have in this country can I just make the following point to him. We have in this country the to him. We have in this country the to him. We have in this country the to him. We have in this country the second highest to him. We have in this country the second highest rate to him. We have in this country the second highest rate of to him. We have in this country the second highest rate of employment second highest rate of employment currently second highest rate of employment currently of second highest rate of employment currently of our second highest rate of employment currently of our adult second highest rate of employment currently of our adult population second highest rate of employment currently of our adult population as currently of our adult population as anybody currently of our adult population as anybody in currently of our adult population as anybody in the currently of our adult population as anybody in the OECD. currently of our adult population as anybody in the OECD. 80% currently of our adult population as anybody in the OECD. 80% of currently of our adult population as anybody in the OECD. 80% of it currently of our adult population as anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is full-time work anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is full-time work - anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is full-time work - 80% anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is full-time work - 80% of anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is full-time work - 80% of those anybody in the OECD. 80% of it is full-time work - 80% of those people full-time work - 80% of those people are full-time work - 80% of those people are working full-time work - 80% of those people are working full-time, full-time work - 80% of those people are working full-time, so full-time work - 80% of those people are working full-time, so we full-time work - 80% of those people are working full-time, so we have full-time work - 80% of those people full-time full-time work - 80% of those people the second highest full-time work - 80% of those people the second highest rate full-time work - 80% of those people the second highest rate of the second highest rate of employment the second highest rate of employment in the second highest rate of employment in the the second highest rate of employment in the OECD. the second highest rate of employment in the OECD. So, the second highest rate of employment in the OECD. So, Mr employment in the OECD. So, Mr Speaker, employment in the OECD. So, Mr Speaker, if employment in the OECD. So, Mr Speaker, if the employment in the OECD. So, Mr Speaker, if the member employment in the OECD. So, Mr Speaker, if the member wants employment in the OECD. So, Mr Speaker, if the member wants to Speaker, if the member wants to slash Speaker, if the member wants to slash migration, Speaker, if the member wants to slash migration, as Speaker, if the member wants to slash migration, as he Speaker, if the member wants to slash migration, as he says, Speaker, if the member wants to slash migration, as he says, and slash migration, as he says, and keep slash migration, as he says, and keep skilled slash migration, as he says, and keep skilled migrants slash migration, as he says, and keep skilled migrants away, slash migration, as he says, and keep skilled migrants away, as slash migration, as he says, and keep skilled migrants away, as he slash migration, as he says, and keep skilled migrants away, as he is keep skilled migrants away, as he is certainly keep skilled migrants away, as he is certainly saying keep skilled migrants away, as he is certainly saying that keep skilled migrants away, as he is certainly saying that he keep skilled migrants away, as he is certainly saying that he wants keep skilled migrants away, as he is certainly saying that he wants to certainly saying that he wants to do, certainly saying that he wants to do, that certainly saying that he wants to do, that would certainly saying that he wants to do, that would undoubtedly certainly saying that he wants to do, that would undoubtedly slow certainly saying that he wants to do, that would undoubtedly slow and do, that would undoubtedly slow and perhaps do, that would undoubtedly slow and perhaps even do, that would undoubtedly slow and perhaps even stall do, that would undoubtedly slow and perhaps even stall the do, that would undoubtedly slow and perhaps even stall the New do, that would undoubtedly slow and perhaps even stall the New Zealand perhaps even stall the New Zealand economy. perhaps even stall the New Zealand economy. I perhaps even stall the New Zealand economy. I appreciate perhaps even stall the New Zealand economy. I appreciate that perhaps even stall the New Zealand economy. I appreciate that might perhaps even stall the New Zealand economy. I appreciate that might be economy. I appreciate that might be because economy. I appreciate that might be because the economy. I appreciate that might be because the member economy. I appreciate that might be because the member thinks because the member thinks everythings because the member thinks everythings is because the member thinks everythings is happening because the member thinks everythings is happening a because the member thinks everythings is happening a little everythings is happening a little everythings is happening a little everythings is happening a little bit too everythings is happening a little bit too quickly everythings is happening a little bit too quickly for everythings is happening a little bit too quickly for him everythings is happening a little bit too quickly for him but everythings is happening a little bit too quickly for him but for everythings is happening a little bit too quickly for him but for most bit too quickly for him but for most New bit too quickly for him but for most New Zealanders bit too quickly for him but for most New Zealanders it bit too quickly for him but for most New Zealanders it is New Zealanders it is positive. New Zealanders it is New Zealanders it is positive. Order! The New Zealanders it is positive. Order! The answer New Zealanders it is positive. Order! The answer is New Zealanders it is positive. Order! The answer is very New Zealanders it is positive. Order! The answer is very long. New Zealanders it is positive. Order! The answer is very long. If Order! The answer is very long. If that Order! The answer is very long. If that is Order! The answer is very long. If that is remotely Order! The answer is very long. If that is remotely true Order! The answer is very long. If that is remotely true why Order! The answer is very long. If that is remotely true why is Order! The answer is very long. If that is remotely true why is highly that is remotely true why is highly respected that is remotely true why is highly respected former that is remotely true why is highly respected former director that is remotely true why is highly respected former director of that is remotely true why is highly respected former director of the respected former director of the Reserve respected former director of the Reserve Bank respected former director of the Reserve Bank Michael respected former director of the Reserve Bank Michael Riddell respected former director of the Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of his Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of his claim, Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of his claim, and Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of his claim, and he does Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of his claim, and he does on Reserve Bank Michael Riddell saying of his claim, and he does on page of his claim, and he does on page two of his claim, and he does on page two of of his claim, and he does on page two of his of his claim, and he does on page two of his latest of his claim, and he does on page two of his latest report, of his claim, and he does on page two of his latest report, he of his claim, and he does on page two of his latest report, he quotes two of his latest report, he quotes the two of his latest report, he quotes the minister two of his latest report, he quotes the minister who two of his latest report, he quotes the minister who says, two of his latest report, he quotes the minister who says, "Our two of his latest report, he quotes the minister who says, "Our economy the minister who says, "Our economy is the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% larger the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% larger than the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% larger than it the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% larger than it was the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% larger than it was just the minister who says, "Our economy is 14% larger than it was just five is 14% larger than it was just five years is 14% larger than it was just five two is 14% larger than it was just five years ago" and is 14% larger than it was just five years ago" and Mr is 14% larger than it was just five years ago" and Mr Riddell is 14% larger than it was just five years ago" and Mr Riddell says, years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, but years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, but the years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, but the population years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, but the population is years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, but the population is about years ago" and Mr Riddell says, "Yes, but the population is about 8% "Yes, but the population is about 8% larger. "Yes, but the population is about 8% larger. That "Yes, but the population is about 8% larger. That would "Yes, but the population is about 8% larger. That would leave "Yes, but the population is about 8% larger. That would leave an "Yes, but the population is about 8% larger. That would leave an annual larger. That would leave an annual average larger. That would leave an annual average growth larger. That would leave an annual average growth in larger. That would leave an annual average growth in per larger. That would leave an annual average growth in per capita larger. That would leave an annual average growth in per capita terms average growth in per capita terms of average growth in per capita terms of 1. average growth in per capita terms of 1. 1.1%." average growth in per capita terms of 1. 1.1%." How average growth in per capita terms of 1. 1.1%." How come average growth in per capita terms of 1. 1.1%." How come the average growth in per capita terms of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister can't of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister can't get of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister can't get that of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister can't get that through of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister can't get that through his of 1. 1.1%." How come the minister can't get that through his thick can't get that through his thick head? can't get that through his thick head? The can't get that through his thick head? The last can't get that through his thick head? The last part can't get that through his thick head? The last part is can't get that through his thick head? The last part is completely head? The last part is completely unparliamentary head? The last part is completely unparliamentary and head? The last part is completely unparliamentary and unnecessary. unparliamentary and unnecessary. unparliamentary and unnecessary. <INTERRUPTION> The <INTERRUPTION> The minister <INTERRUPTION> The minister can <INTERRUPTION> The minister can address <INTERRUPTION> The minister can address the <INTERRUPTION> The minister can address the first The minister can address the first part The minister can address the first part of The minister can address the first part of the The minister can address the first part of the question. The minister can address the first part of the question. I The minister can address the first part of the question. I stand part of the question. I stand corrected part of the question. I stand corrected but part of the question. I stand corrected but I part of the question. I stand corrected but I don't part of the question. I stand corrected but I don't think part of the question. I stand corrected but I don't think Mr corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell has corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell has ever corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell has ever been corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell has ever been a corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell has ever been a director corrected but I don't think Mr Riddell has ever been a director of Riddell has ever been a director of the Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. I Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. I think Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. I think he Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. I think he worked Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. I think he worked at Riddell has ever been a director of the bank. I think he worked at the the bank. I think he worked at the bank. the bank. I think he worked at the bank. I the bank. I think he worked at the bank. I stand the bank. I think he worked at the bank. I stand corrected the bank. I think he worked at the bank. I stand corrected on the bank. I think he worked at the bank. I stand corrected on that. bank. I stand corrected on that. That bank. I stand corrected on that. That is bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my memory bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my memory of bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my memory of it. bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my memory of it. I bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my memory of it. I have bank. I stand corrected on that. That is my memory of it. I have no That is my memory of it. I have no idea That is my memory of it. I have no idea what That is my memory of it. I have no idea what the That is my memory of it. I have no idea what the member That is my memory of it. I have no idea what the member was That is my memory of it. I have no idea what the member was trying That is my memory of it. I have no idea what the member was trying to idea what the member was trying to ask. idea what the member was trying to ask. I idea what the member was trying to ask. I think idea what the member was trying to ask. I think it idea what the member was trying to ask. I think it was idea what the member was trying to ask. I think it was something idea what the member was trying to ask. I think it was something to idea what the member was trying to ask. I think it was something to do ask. I think it was something to do with ask. I think it was something to do with per ask. I think it was something to do with per capita ask. I think it was something to do with per capita growth ask. I think it was something to do with per capita growth and ask. I think it was something to do with per capita growth and can ask. I think it was something to do with per capita growth and can I ask. I think it was something to do with per capita growth and can I say with per capita growth and can I say that with per capita growth and can I say that in with per capita growth and can I say that in terms with per capita growth and can I say that in terms of with per capita growth and can I say that in terms of per with per capita growth and can I say that in terms of per capita with per capita growth and can I say that in terms of per capita growth that in terms of per capita growth he that in terms of per capita growth he just that in terms of per capita growth he just needs that in terms of per capita growth he just needs to that in terms of per capita growth he just needs to look that in terms of per capita growth he just needs to look at that in terms of per capita growth he just needs to look at the he just needs to look at the predictions he just needs to look at the predictions which he just needs to look at the predictions which he he just needs to look at the predictions which he quoted he just needs to look at the predictions which he quoted so predictions which he quoted so predictions which he quoted so predictions which he quoted so effortlessly from predictions which he quoted so effortlessly from the predictions which he quoted so effortlessly from the Budget predictions which he quoted so effortlessly from the Budget before, effortlessly from the Budget before, which effortlessly from the Budget before, which shows effortlessly from the Budget before, which shows per effortlessly from the Budget before, which shows per capita effortlessly from the Budget before, which shows per capita growth effortlessly from the Budget before, which shows per capita growth of which shows per capita growth of well which shows per capita growth of well above which shows per capita growth of well above 1% which shows per capita growth of well above 1% each which shows per capita growth of well above 1% each year which shows per capita growth of well above 1% each year over which shows per capita growth of well above 1% each year over the well above 1% each year over the forecast well above 1% each year over the forecast period. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister of My question is to the Minister of Finance: My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by My question is to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by his Finance: Does he stand by his statement Finance: Does he stand by his statement that Finance: Does he stand by his statement that "I Finance: Does he stand by his statement that "I just Finance: Does he stand by his statement that "I just don't Finance: Does he stand by his statement that "I just don't think statement that "I just don't think of statement that "I just don't think of the statement that "I just don't think of the Budget statement that "I just don't think of the Budget in statement that "I just don't think of the Budget in terms statement that "I just don't think of the Budget in terms of statement that "I just don't think of the Budget in terms of the of the Budget in terms of the election of the Budget in terms of the election cycle"? Yes. Yes. New Yes. New Zealanders Yes. New Zealanders have Yes. New Zealanders have worked Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over the Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over the last Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over the last eight Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over the last eight years. Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over the last eight years. They Yes. New Zealanders have worked hard over the last eight years. They have over the last eight years. They have made over the last eight years. They have made sacrifices over the last eight years. They have made sacrifices and over the last eight years. They have made sacrifices and they over the last eight years. They have made sacrifices and they have over the last eight years. They have made sacrifices and they have turned made sacrifices and they have turned this made sacrifices and they have turned this country made sacrifices and they have turned this country around. made sacrifices and they have turned this country around. Now made sacrifices and they have turned this country around. Now that made sacrifices and they have turned this country around. Now that the this country around. Now that the this country around. Now that the this country around. Now that the economy is this country around. Now that the economy is responding this country around. Now that the economy is responding well this country around. Now that the economy is responding well to this country around. Now that the economy is responding well to the economy is responding well to the Government's economy is responding well to the Government's sensible, economy is responding well to the Government's sensible, consistent Government's sensible, consistent economic Government's sensible, consistent economic plan, Government's sensible, consistent economic plan, we Government's sensible, consistent economic plan, we have Government's sensible, consistent economic plan, we have the Government's sensible, consistent economic plan, we have the financial economic plan, we have the financial capacity, economic plan, we have the financial capacity, finally, economic plan, we have the financial capacity, finally, to economic plan, we have the financial capacity, finally, to help economic plan, we have the financial capacity, finally, to help New capacity, finally, to help New capacity, finally, to help New capacity, finally, to help New Zealand families capacity, finally, to help New Zealand families share capacity, finally, to help New Zealand families share in capacity, finally, to help New Zealand families share in the Zealand families share in the Zealand families share in the Zealand families share in the benefits of Zealand families share in the benefits of stronger Zealand families share in the benefits of stronger economic benefits of stronger economic growth. benefits of stronger economic growth. I benefits of stronger economic growth. I thank benefits of stronger economic growth. I thank the benefits of stronger economic growth. I thank the member benefits of stronger economic growth. I thank the member for benefits of stronger economic growth. I thank the member for his growth. I thank the member for his question. growth. I thank the member for his question. Why growth. I thank the member for his question. Why then growth. I thank the member for his question. Why then did growth. I thank the member for his question. Why then did he growth. I thank the member for his question. Why then did he prioritise question. Why then did he prioritise giving question. Why then did he prioritise giving tax question. Why then did he prioritise giving tax cuts question. Why then did he prioritise giving tax cuts something question. Why then did he prioritise giving tax cuts something called question. Why then did he prioritise giving tax cuts something called an giving tax cuts something called an election giving tax cuts something called an election bribe giving tax cuts something called an election bribe eight giving tax cuts something called an election bribe eight years giving tax cuts something called an election bribe eight years in giving tax cuts something called an election bribe eight years in the election bribe eight years in the making election bribe eight years in the making by election bribe eight years in the making by Tracey election bribe eight years in the making by Tracey Watkins election bribe eight years in the making by Tracey Watkins to election bribe eight years in the making by Tracey Watkins to people making by Tracey Watkins to people like making by Tracey Watkins to people like him making by Tracey Watkins to people like him and making by Tracey Watkins to people like him and me making by Tracey Watkins to people like him and me over making by Tracey Watkins to people like him and me over ending like him and me over ending homelessness? like him and me over ending homelessness? I like him and me over ending homelessness? I can like him and me over ending homelessness? I can assure like him and me over ending homelessness? I can assure the homelessness? I can assure the member homelessness? I can assure the member I homelessness? I can assure the member I wasn't homelessness? I can assure the member I wasn't thinking homelessness? I can assure the member I wasn't thinking of homelessness? I can assure the member I wasn't thinking of him homelessness? I can assure the member I wasn't thinking of him at member I wasn't thinking of him at any member I wasn't thinking of him at any stage member I wasn't thinking of him at any stage in member I wasn't thinking of him at any stage in preparation member I wasn't thinking of him at any stage in preparation of member I wasn't thinking of him at any stage in preparation of the any stage in preparation of the Budget any stage in preparation of the Budget process. any stage in preparation of the Budget process. But any stage in preparation of the Budget process. But in any stage in preparation of the Budget process. But in terms any stage in preparation of the Budget process. But in terms of Budget process. But in terms of families' Budget process. But in terms of families' incomes, Budget process. But in terms of families' incomes, I Budget process. But in terms of families' incomes, I was Budget process. But in terms of families' incomes, I was thinking families' incomes, I was thinking about families' incomes, I was thinking about New families' incomes, I was thinking about New Zealand families' incomes, I was thinking about New Zealand families. families' incomes, I was thinking about New Zealand families. I families' incomes, I was thinking about New Zealand families. I was about New Zealand families. I was about New Zealand families. I was about New Zealand families. I was thinking about about New Zealand families. I was thinking about the about New Zealand families. I was thinking about the low-income thinking about the low-income families thinking about the low-income families with thinking about the low-income families with large thinking about the low-income families with large numbers thinking about the low-income families with large numbers of families with large numbers of children families with large numbers of children who families with large numbers of children who are families with large numbers of children who are potentially children who are potentially children who are potentially children who are potentially struggling to children who are potentially struggling to get children who are potentially struggling to get ahead. children who are potentially struggling to get ahead. I children who are potentially struggling to get ahead. I was struggling to get ahead. I was thinking struggling to get ahead. I was thinking of struggling to get ahead. I was thinking of those struggling to get ahead. I was thinking of those with struggling to get ahead. I was thinking of those with high struggling to get ahead. I was thinking of those with high housing thinking of those with high housing costs. thinking of those with high housing costs. I thinking of those with high housing costs. I was thinking of those with high housing costs. I was thinking thinking of those with high housing costs. I was thinking about thinking of those with high housing costs. I was thinking about middle costs. I was thinking about middle income costs. I was thinking about middle income New costs. I was thinking about middle income New Zealanders, costs. I was thinking about middle income New Zealanders, who costs. I was thinking about middle income New Zealanders, who get costs. I was thinking about middle income New Zealanders, who get to income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and facing income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and facing a income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and facing a 30 income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and facing a 30 cent income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in income New Zealanders, who get to $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in the $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in the dollar $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in the dollar tax $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in the dollar tax rate $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in the dollar tax rate and $48,000 and facing a 30 cent in the dollar tax rate and people dollar tax rate and people struggling dollar tax rate and people struggling to dollar tax rate and people struggling to get dollar tax rate and people struggling to get emergency dollar tax rate and people struggling to get emergency houses struggling to get emergency houses and struggling to get emergency houses and you struggling to get emergency houses and you will struggling to get emergency houses and you will see struggling to get emergency houses and you will see things in struggling to get emergency houses and you will see things in the and you will see things in the Budget and you will see things in the Budget about and you will see things in the Budget about that. and you will see things in the Budget about that. I and you will see things in the Budget about that. I think and you will see things in the Budget about that. I think New Budget about that. I think New Zealanders Budget about that. I think New Zealanders will Budget about that. I think New Zealanders will see Budget about that. I think New Zealanders will see a Budget about that. I think New Zealanders will see a balanced Zealanders will see a balanced Budget, Zealanders will see a balanced Budget, which Zealanders will see a balanced Budget, which focuses Zealanders will see a balanced Budget, which focuses on Zealanders will see a balanced Budget, which focuses on the Zealanders will see a balanced Budget, which focuses on the things Budget, which focuses on the things that Budget, which focuses on the things that matter Budget, which focuses on the things that matter to Budget, which focuses on the things that matter to New Budget, which focuses on the things that matter to New Zealanders. Budget, which focuses on the things that matter to New Zealanders. Why that matter to New Zealanders. Why did that matter to New Zealanders. Why did he that matter to New Zealanders. Why did he prioritise that matter to New Zealanders. Why did he prioritise tax that matter to New Zealanders. Why did he prioritise tax cuts that matter to New Zealanders. Why did he prioritise tax cuts over did he prioritise tax cuts over funding did he prioritise tax cuts over funding early did he prioritise tax cuts over funding early childhood did he prioritise tax cuts over funding early childhood education did he prioritise tax cuts over funding early childhood education to funding early childhood education to make funding early childhood education to make up funding early childhood education to make up for funding early childhood education to make up for the funding early childhood education to make up for the $110 funding early childhood education to make up for the $110 per funding early childhood education to make up for the $110 per child, funding early childhood education to make up for the $110 per child, per make up for the $110 per child, per make up for the $110 per child, per make up for the $110 per child, per year cut make up for the $110 per child, per year cut that make up for the $110 per child, per year cut that has make up for the $110 per child, per year cut that has happened make up for the $110 per child, per year cut that has happened under make up for the $110 per child, per year cut that has happened under his year cut that has happened under his year cut that has happened under his year cut that has happened under his Government? Mr year cut that has happened under his Government? Mr Speaker, year cut that has happened under his Government? Mr Speaker, the year cut that has happened under his Government? Mr Speaker, the member Government? Mr Speaker, the member is Government? Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. Government? Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. The Government? Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. The Government Government? Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. The Government has is wrong. The Government has invested is wrong. The Government has invested something is wrong. The Government has invested something like is wrong. The Government has invested something like $1.1 is wrong. The Government has invested something like $1.1 billion invested something like $1.1 billion more invested something like $1.1 billion more in invested something like $1.1 billion more in the invested something like $1.1 billion more in the education invested something like $1.1 billion more in the education services, more in the education services, including more in the education services, including fully more in the education services, including fully funding more in the education services, including fully funding roll more in the education services, including fully funding roll growth including fully funding roll growth at including fully funding roll growth at early including fully funding roll growth at early childhood including fully funding roll growth at early childhood centres including fully funding roll growth at early childhood centres and at early childhood centres and providing at early childhood centres and providing a at early childhood centres and providing a targeted at early childhood centres and providing a targeted payment at early childhood centres and providing a targeted payment for providing a targeted payment for providing a targeted payment for providing a targeted payment for childcare centres providing a targeted payment for childcare centres where providing a targeted payment for childcare centres where there providing a targeted payment for childcare centres where there are childcare centres where there are childcare centres where there are childcare centres where there are children who childcare centres where there are children who are childcare centres where there are children who are at childcare centres where there are children who are at risk childcare centres where there are children who are at risk and childcare centres where there are children who are at risk and that childcare centres where there are children who are at risk and that is children who are at risk and that is all children who are at risk and that is all in children who are at risk and that is all in Budget children who are at risk and that is all in Budget 2017. children who are at risk and that is all in Budget 2017. The children who are at risk and that is all in Budget 2017. The member children who are at risk and that is all in Budget 2017. The member may all in Budget 2017. The member may not all in Budget 2017. The member may not have all in Budget 2017. The member may not have got all in Budget 2017. The member may not have got to all in Budget 2017. The member may not have got to that all in Budget 2017. The member may not have got to that bit all in Budget 2017. The member may not have got to that bit but all in Budget 2017. The member may not have got to that bit but the not have got to that bit but the important not have got to that bit but the important thing not have got to that bit but the important thing is not have got to that bit but the important thing is that not have got to that bit but the important thing is that actually not have got to that bit but the important thing is that actually it important thing is that actually it is important thing is that actually it is important important thing is that actually it is important to important thing is that actually it is important to think important thing is that actually it is important to think about important thing is that actually it is important to think about family is important to think about family incomes is important to think about family incomes and is important to think about family incomes and I is important to think about family incomes and I appreciate is important to think about family incomes and I appreciate the is important to think about family incomes and I appreciate the member incomes and I appreciate the member all incomes and I appreciate the member never ever wants incomes and I appreciate the member never ever wants to incomes and I appreciate the member never ever wants to think incomes and I appreciate the member never ever wants to think about never ever wants to think about family never ever wants to think about family incomes, never ever wants to think about family incomes, but never ever wants to think about family incomes, but this never ever wants to think about family incomes, but this Government family incomes, but this Government does. family incomes, but this Government does. Why family incomes, but this Government does. Why has family incomes, but this Government does. Why has he family incomes, but this Government does. Why has he prioritised family incomes, but this Government does. Why has he prioritised tax does. Why has he prioritised tax cuts does. Why has he prioritised tax cuts over does. Why has he prioritised tax cuts over funding does. Why has he prioritised tax cuts over funding for does. Why has he prioritised tax cuts over funding for primary cuts over funding for primary healthcare, cuts over funding for primary healthcare, which cuts over funding for primary healthcare, which has cuts over funding for primary healthcare, which has led cuts over funding for primary healthcare, which has led the healthcare, which has led the President healthcare, which has led the President of healthcare, which has led the President of the healthcare, which has led the President of the medical healthcare, which has led the President of the medical council healthcare, which has led the President of the medical council to President of the medical council to say President of the medical council to say that President of the medical council to say that GPs President of the medical council to say that GPs will President of the medical council to say that GPs will need President of the medical council to say that GPs will need to President of the medical council to say that GPs will need to raise say that GPs will need to raise fees? say that GPs will need to raise fees? Again, say that GPs will need to raise fees? Again, the say that GPs will need to raise fees? Again, the member say that GPs will need to raise fees? Again, the member is say that GPs will need to raise fees? Again, the member is wrong. fees? Again, the member is wrong. This fees? Again, the member is wrong. This Government fees? Again, the member is wrong. This Government has fees? Again, the member is wrong. This Government has prioritised fees? Again, the member is wrong. This Government has prioritised $7 This Government has prioritised $7 billion This Government has prioritised $7 billion in This Government has prioritised $7 billion in new This Government has prioritised $7 billion in new expenditure This Government has prioritised $7 billion in new expenditure and billion in new expenditure and public billion in new expenditure and public services billion in new expenditure and public services in billion in new expenditure and public services in this billion in new expenditure and public services in this Budget, public services in this Budget, including public services in this Budget, including $3.9 public services in this Budget, including $3.9 billion public services in this Budget, including $3.9 billion in public services in this Budget, including $3.9 billion in the public services in this Budget, including $3.9 billion in the health including $3.9 billion in the health sector, including $3.9 billion in the health sector, which, including $3.9 billion in the health sector, which, as including $3.9 billion in the health sector, which, as the including $3.9 billion in the health sector, which, as the minister including $3.9 billion in the health sector, which, as the minister has sector, which, as the minister has pointed sector, which, as the minister has pointed out, sector, which, as the minister has pointed out, is sector, which, as the minister has pointed out, is the sector, which, as the minister has pointed out, is the largest sector, which, as the minister has pointed out, is the largest increase pointed out, is the largest increase in pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. So pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. So there pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. So there is pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. So there is no pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. So there is no way pointed out, is the largest increase in 11 years. So there is no way that in 11 years. So there is no way that the in 11 years. So there is no way that in in 11 years. So there is no way that the member can in 11 years. So there is no way that the member can say in 11 years. So there is no way that the member can say that in 11 years. So there is no way that the member can say that and, in 11 years. So there is no way that the member can say that and, yes, the member can say that and, yes, this the member can say that and, yes, this Government the member can say that and, yes, this Government is the member can say that and, yes, this Government is focused the member can say that and, yes, this Government is focused on the member can say that and, yes, this Government is focused on family this Government is focused on family incomes. this Government is focused on family incomes. This this Government is focused on family incomes. This Government this Government is focused on family incomes. This Government thinks this Government is focused on family incomes. This Government thinks of incomes. This Government thinks of those incomes. This Government thinks of those families incomes. This Government thinks of those families who incomes. This Government thinks of those families who are incomes. This Government thinks of those families who are earning incomes. This Government thinks of those families who are earning and those families who are earning and working those families who are earning and working hard, those families who are earning and working hard, who those families who are earning and working hard, who don't those families who are earning and working hard, who don't actually working hard, who don't actually have working hard, who don't actually have the working hard, who don't actually have the ability working hard, who don't actually have the ability to working hard, who don't actually have the ability to get working hard, who don't actually have the ability to get ahead, working hard, who don't actually have the ability to get ahead, and have the ability to get ahead, and the have the ability to get ahead, and the tax have the ability to get ahead, and the tax package, have the ability to get ahead, and the tax package, the have the ability to get ahead, and the tax package, the family have the ability to get ahead, and the tax package, the family tax the tax package, the family tax credits the tax package, the family tax credits and the tax package, the family tax credits and the the tax package, the family tax credits and the accommodation credits and the accommodation supplement credits and the accommodation supplement will credits and the accommodation supplement will help credits and the accommodation supplement will help them credits and the accommodation supplement will help them and credits and the accommodation supplement will help them and we credits and the accommodation supplement will help them and we are supplement will help them and we are very supplement will help them and we are very proud supplement will help them and we are very proud of that. supplement will help them and we are very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> Order! very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why has very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why has he very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why has he prioritised very proud of that. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why has he prioritised tax Order! Why has he prioritised tax cuts Order! Why has he prioritised tax cuts over Order! Why has he prioritised tax cuts over support Order! Why has he prioritised tax cuts over support for Order! Why has he prioritised tax cuts over support for growing Order! Why has he prioritised tax cuts over support for growing the cuts over support for growing the economy cuts over support for growing the economy leading cuts over support for growing the economy leading Zero's cuts over support for growing the economy leading Zero's New Zealand economy leading Zero's New Zealand country economy leading Zero's New Zealand country manager economy leading Zero's New Zealand country manager to economy leading Zero's New Zealand country manager to say, economy leading Zero's New Zealand country manager to say, "The economy leading Zero's New Zealand country manager to say, "The Budget country manager to say, "The Budget has country manager to say, "The Budget has let country manager to say, "The Budget has let down country manager to say, "The Budget has let down small country manager to say, "The Budget has let down small businesses country manager to say, "The Budget has let down small businesses in country manager to say, "The Budget has let down small businesses in the has let down small businesses in the tech has let down small businesses in the tech sector." has let down small businesses in the tech sector." ? has let down small businesses in the tech sector." ? Again, has let down small businesses in the tech sector." ? Again, Mr has let down small businesses in the tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, the tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, has tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, the member is tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. The tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. The Budget tech sector." ? Again, Mr Speaker, the member is wrong. The Budget puts the member is wrong. The Budget puts a the member is wrong. The Budget puts a significant the member is wrong. The Budget puts a significant investment the member is wrong. The Budget puts a significant investment into the member is wrong. The Budget puts a significant investment into the a significant investment into the a significant investment into the a significant investment into the innovative New a significant investment into the innovative New Zealand a significant investment into the innovative New Zealand programme innovative New Zealand programme around innovative New Zealand programme around encouraging innovative New Zealand programme around encouraging the innovative New Zealand programme around encouraging the development around encouraging the development of around encouraging the development of research around encouraging the development of research and around encouraging the development of research and development. around encouraging the development of research and development. We around encouraging the development of research and development. We have of research and development. We have just of research and development. We have just had of research and development. We have just had the of research and development. We have just had the biggest of research and development. We have just had the biggest increase of research and development. We have just had the biggest increase in just had the biggest increase in just had the biggest increase in just had the biggest increase in business R&D just had the biggest increase in business R&D recorded just had the biggest increase in business R&D recorded in just had the biggest increase in business R&D recorded in New just had the biggest increase in business R&D recorded in New Zealand business R&D recorded in New Zealand business R&D recorded in New Zealand business R&D recorded in New Zealand for many business R&D recorded in New Zealand for many years. business R&D recorded in New Zealand for many years. I business R&D recorded in New Zealand for many years. I appreciate business R&D recorded in New Zealand for many years. I appreciate the for many years. I appreciate the for many years. I appreciate the for many years. I appreciate the member is for many years. I appreciate the member is going for many years. I appreciate the member is going around for many years. I appreciate the member is going around trying for many years. I appreciate the member is going around trying to member is going around trying to member is going around trying to member is going around trying to find reasons member is going around trying to find reasons why member is going around trying to find reasons why Labour member is going around trying to find reasons why Labour voted find reasons why Labour voted against find reasons why Labour voted against the find reasons why Labour voted against the Family find reasons why Labour voted against the Family Incomes find reasons why Labour voted against the Family Incomes Package against the Family Incomes Package against the Family Incomes Package against the Family Incomes Package last week against the Family Incomes Package last week but against the Family Incomes Package last week but he against the Family Incomes Package last week but he is against the Family Incomes Package last week but he is a against the Family Incomes Package last week but he is a little against the Family Incomes Package last week but he is a little late. last week but he is a little late. They last week but he is a little late. They should last week but he is a little late. They should have last week but he is a little late. They should have changed last week but he is a little late. They should have changed their last week but he is a little late. They should have changed their minds They should have changed their minds They should have changed their minds They should have changed their minds and voted They should have changed their minds and voted for They should have changed their minds and voted for it They should have changed their minds and voted for it like They should have changed their minds and voted for it like the They should have changed their minds and voted for it like the Greens. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister responsible My question is to the Minister responsible for My question is to the Minister responsible for Social My question is to the Minister responsible for Social Investment: responsible for Social Investment: How responsible for Social Investment: How does responsible for Social Investment: How does Budget responsible for Social Investment: How does Budget 17 responsible for Social Investment: How does Budget 17 support responsible for Social Investment: How does Budget 17 support a responsible for Social Investment: How does Budget 17 support a social How does Budget 17 support a social investment How does Budget 17 support a social investment approach How does Budget 17 support a social investment approach to How does Budget 17 support a social investment approach to Justice? As As part As part of As part of the As part of the Government's As part of the Government's $321 As part of the Government's $321 million As part of the Government's $321 million social As part of the Government's $321 million social investment As part of the Government's $321 million social investment package million social investment package the million social investment package the PM million social investment package the PM announced million social investment package the PM announced earlier million social investment package the PM announced earlier this million social investment package the PM announced earlier this month, the PM announced earlier this month, Budget the PM announced earlier this month, Budget 2017 the PM announced earlier this month, Budget 2017 provides the PM announced earlier this month, Budget 2017 provides an the PM announced earlier this month, Budget 2017 provides an extra the PM announced earlier this month, Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million over Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million over the Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million over the next Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million over the next four Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million over the next four years Budget 2017 provides an extra $46.8 million over the next four years to million over the next four years to fund million over the next four years to fund two million over the next four years to fund two new million over the next four years to fund two new initiatives million over the next four years to fund two new initiatives to million over the next four years to fund two new initiatives to support fund two new initiatives to support the fund two new initiatives to support the Government's fund two new initiatives to support the Government's social fund two new initiatives to support the Government's social investment the Government's social investment approach the Government's social investment approach to the Government's social investment approach to justice. the Government's social investment approach to justice. The the Government's social investment approach to justice. The first the Government's social investment approach to justice. The first is the Government's social investment approach to justice. The first is a approach to justice. The first is a $32.9 approach to justice. The first is a $32.9 million approach to justice. The first is a $32.9 million burglary approach to justice. The first is a $32.9 million burglary prevention $32.9 million burglary prevention initiative $32.9 million burglary prevention initiative targeting $32.9 million burglary prevention initiative targeting those $32.9 million burglary prevention initiative targeting those under $32.9 million burglary prevention initiative targeting those under 25 initiative targeting those under 25 and initiative targeting those under 25 and helps initiative targeting those under 25 and helps fund initiative targeting those under 25 and helps fund services initiative targeting those under 25 and helps fund services to initiative targeting those under 25 and helps fund services to change and helps fund services to change and helps fund services to change and helps fund services to change offender behaviour and helps fund services to change offender behaviour and offender behaviour and support offender behaviour and offender behaviour and support victims. The offender behaviour and support victims. The second offender behaviour and support victims. The second is offender behaviour and support victims. The second is a offender behaviour and support victims. The second is a $13.9 victims. The second is a $13.9 million victims. The second is a $13.9 million investment victims. The second is a $13.9 million investment into million investment into 14-16-year-old million investment into 14-16-year-old offending million investment into 14-16-year-old offending over million investment into 14-16-year-old offending over four 14-16-year-old offending over four years 14-16-year-old offending over four years to 14-16-year-old offending over four years to help 14-16-year-old offending over four years to help young 14-16-year-old offending over four years to help young people 14-16-year-old offending over four years to help young people alter years to help young people alter harmful years to help young people alter harmful behavor, years to help young people alter harmful behavor, increase harmful behavor, increase self-control harmful behavor, increase self-control and harmful behavor, increase self-control and reduce harmful behavor, increase self-control and reduce future self-control and reduce future offending. self-control and reduce future offending. What self-control and reduce future offending. What evidence self-control and reduce future offending. What evidence is self-control and reduce future offending. What evidence is there self-control and reduce future offending. What evidence is there to offending. What evidence is there to support offending. What evidence is there to support these offending. What evidence is there to support these initiatives? offending. What evidence is there to support these initiatives? Through support these initiatives? Through support these initiatives? Through support these initiatives? Through the investment support these initiatives? Through the investment approach support these initiatives? Through the investment approach to support these initiatives? Through the investment approach to justice, the investment approach to justice, which the investment approach to justice, which has the investment approach to justice, which has been the investment approach to justice, which has been working the investment approach to justice, which has been working on the investment approach to justice, which has been working on this the investment approach to justice, which has been working on this for which has been working on this for the which has been working on this for the past which has been working on this for the past 18 which has been working on this for the past 18 months, which has been working on this for the past 18 months, which which has been working on this for the past 18 months, which uses which has been working on this for the past 18 months, which uses data the past 18 months, which uses data to the past 18 months, which uses data to identify the past 18 months, which uses data to identify risk the past 18 months, which uses data to identify risk early the past 18 months, which uses data to identify risk early and the past 18 months, which uses data to identify risk early and identify to identify risk early and identify evidence-based to identify risk early and identify evidence-based interventions to identify risk early and identify evidence-based interventions to evidence-based interventions to evidence-based interventions to evidence-based interventions to reduce risk, evidence-based interventions to reduce risk, manage evidence-based interventions to reduce risk, manage offending, reduce risk, manage offending, reduce reduce risk, manage offending, reduce the reduce risk, manage offending, reduce the number reduce risk, manage offending, reduce the number of reduce risk, manage offending, reduce the number of victims, reduce risk, manage offending, reduce the number of victims, the reduce the number of victims, the Government reduce the number of victims, the Government has reduce the number of victims, the Government has been reduce the number of victims, the Government has been able reduce the number of victims, the Government has been able to reduce the number of victims, the Government has been able to target Government has been able to target intervention Government has been able to target intervention points Government has been able to target intervention points to Government has been able to target intervention points to achieve Government has been able to target intervention points to achieve the intervention points to achieve the greatest intervention points to achieve the greatest results. intervention points to achieve the greatest results. Through intervention points to achieve the greatest results. Through our intervention points to achieve the greatest results. Through our youth greatest results. Through our youth offending greatest results. Through our youth offending initiative greatest results. Through our youth offending initiative we greatest results. Through our youth offending initiative we expect greatest results. Through our youth offending initiative we expect to offending initiative we expect to reduce offending initiative we expect to reduce the offending initiative we expect to reduce the number offending initiative we expect to reduce the number of offending initiative we expect to reduce the number of estimated reduce the number of estimated future reduce the number of estimated future offences reduce the number of estimated future offences by reduce the number of estimated future offences by about reduce the number of estimated future offences by about 18-32% reduce the number of estimated future offences by about 18-32% and future offences by about 18-32% and future offences by about 18-32% and future offences by about 18-32% and make savings future offences by about 18-32% and make savings between future offences by about 18-32% and make savings between $166 future offences by about 18-32% and make savings between $166 million make savings between $166 million and make savings between $166 million and $347 make savings between $166 million and $347 million make savings between $166 million and $347 million in make savings between $166 million and $347 million in justice make savings between $166 million and $347 million in justice services and $347 million in justice services over and $347 million in justice services over the and $347 million in justice services over the next and $347 million in justice services over the next 20 and $347 million in justice services over the next 20 years. and $347 million in justice services over the next 20 years. We and $347 million in justice services over the next 20 years. We know and $347 million in justice services over the next 20 years. We know that over the next 20 years. We know that robberies over the next 20 years. We know that robberies committed over the next 20 years. We know that robberies committed by over the next 20 years. We know that robberies committed by those over the next 20 years. We know that robberies committed by those under robberies committed by those under 25 robberies committed by those under 25 have robberies committed by those under 25 have been robberies committed by those under 25 have been identified robberies committed by those under 25 have been identified as robberies committed by those under 25 have been identified as one robberies committed by those under 25 have been identified as one of 25 have been identified as one of the 25 have been identified as one of the highest 25 have been identified as one of the highest risk 25 have been identified as one of the highest risk groups 25 have been identified as one of the highest risk groups for 25 have been identified as one of the highest risk groups for future the highest risk groups for future offending the highest risk groups for future offending and the highest risk groups for future offending and through the highest risk groups for future offending and through the the highest risk groups for future offending and through the burglary offending and through the burglary initiative offending and through the burglary initiative we offending and through the burglary initiative we expect offending and through the burglary initiative we expect to offending and through the burglary initiative we expect to reduce offending and through the burglary initiative we expect to reduce the initiative we expect to reduce the number initiative we expect to reduce the number of initiative we expect to reduce the number of recidivist initiative we expect to reduce the number of recidivist offences initiative we expect to reduce the number of recidivist offences by number of recidivist offences by between number of recidivist offences by between 17% number of recidivist offences by between 17% and number of recidivist offences by between 17% and 38% number of recidivist offences by between 17% and 38% a number of recidivist offences by between 17% and 38% a year. number of recidivist offences by between 17% and 38% a year. Does number of recidivist offences by between 17% and 38% a year. Does she between 17% and 38% a year. Does she between 17% and 38% a year. Does she between 17% and 38% a year. Does she really think between 17% and 38% a year. Does she really think the between 17% and 38% a year. Does she really think the social between 17% and 38% a year. Does she really think the social investment really think the social investment approach really think the social investment approach for really think the social investment approach for youth really think the social investment approach for youth justice really think the social investment approach for youth justice after really think the social investment approach for youth justice after 9 approach for youth justice after 9 years approach for youth justice after 9 years is approach for youth justice after 9 years is working approach for youth justice after 9 years is working when approach for youth justice after 9 years is working when between years is working when between 2015/16 years is working when between 2015/16 the years is working when between 2015/16 the serious years is working when between 2015/16 the serious offending years is working when between 2015/16 the serious offending by 2015/16 the serious offending by teenagers 2015/16 the serious offending by teenagers has 2015/16 the serious offending by teenagers has increased 2015/16 the serious offending by teenagers has increased by 2015/16 the serious offending by teenagers has increased by 12% teenagers has increased by 12% nationally, teenagers has increased by 12% nationally, where teenagers has increased by 12% nationally, where teenage teenagers has increased by 12% nationally, where teenage burglary nationally, where teenage burglary nationally, where teenage burglary nationally, where teenage burglary is up nationally, where teenage burglary is up by nationally, where teenage burglary is up by 13%, nationally, where teenage burglary is up by 13%, teenage nationally, where teenage burglary is up by 13%, teenage robbery nationally, where teenage burglary is up by 13%, teenage robbery is nationally, where teenage burglary is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by 14%, is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by 14%, teenage is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by 14%, teenage homicide is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by 14%, teenage homicide is is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by 14%, teenage homicide is up is up by 13%, teenage robbery is up by 14%, teenage homicide is up and by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage sexual by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage sexual assault by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage sexual assault is by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage sexual assault is up by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage sexual assault is up by by 14%, teenage homicide is up and teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd point teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd point out teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd point out to teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd point out to that teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd point out to that member teenage sexual assault is up by 5%. What I'd point out to that member is What I'd point out to that member is the What I'd point out to that member is the social What I'd point out to that member is the social investment What I'd point out to that member is the social investment approach What I'd point out to that member is the social investment approach is the social investment approach is just the social investment approach is just getting the social investment approach is just getting under the social investment approach is just getting under way just getting under way and just getting under way just getting under way and absolutely we just getting under way and absolutely we believe just getting under way and absolutely we believe it just getting under way and absolutely we believe it will absolutely we believe it will significantly absolutely we believe it will significantly reduce absolutely we believe it will significantly reduce reoffending absolutely we believe it will significantly reduce reoffending but significantly reduce reoffending but what significantly reduce reoffending but what I significantly reduce reoffending but what I can significantly reduce reoffending but what I can also significantly reduce reoffending but what I can also tell significantly reduce reoffending but what I can also tell the significantly reduce reoffending but what I can also tell the member significantly reduce reoffending but what I can also tell the member is what I can also tell the member is that what I can also tell the member is absolutely what I can also tell the member is that while we what I can also tell the member is that while we have what I can also tell the member is that while we have been what I can also tell the member is that while we have been in that while we have been in Government that while we have been in Government we that while we have been in Government we have that while we have been in Government we have seen that while we have been in Government we have seen a that while we have been in Government we have seen a reduction Government we have seen a reduction in Government we have seen a reduction in youth Government we have seen a reduction in youth crime Government we have seen a reduction in youth crime of Government we have seen a reduction in youth crime of 48%. Government we have seen a reduction in youth crime of 48%. I Government we have seen a reduction in youth crime of 48%. I know Government we have seen a reduction in youth crime of 48%. I know it in youth crime of 48%. I know it doesn't in youth crime of 48%. I know it doesn't suit in youth crime of 48%. I know it doesn't suit the in youth crime of 48%. I know it doesn't suit the member in youth crime of 48%. I know it doesn't suit the member but in youth crime of 48%. I know it doesn't suit the member but work doesn't suit the member but work with doesn't suit the member but work with me doesn't suit the member but work with me here, doesn't suit the member but work with me here, 38% doesn't suit the member but work with me here, 38% reduction doesn't suit the member but work with me here, 38% reduction in doesn't suit the member but work with me here, 38% reduction in youth with me here, 38% reduction in youth offending. with me here, 38% reduction in youth offending. Reductions with me here, 38% reduction in youth offending. Reductions in with me here, 38% reduction in youth offending. Reductions in police with me here, 38% reduction in youth offending. Reductions in police ap offending. Reductions in police ap rementions offending. Reductions in police ap rementions of offending. Reductions in police ap rementions of young offending. Reductions in police ap rementions of young people offending. Reductions in police ap rementions of young people between rementions of young people between rementions of young people between rementions of young people between 40% and rementions of young people between 40% and 50%. rementions of young people between 40% and 50%. The rementions of young people between 40% and 50%. The number rementions of young people between 40% and 50%. The number of rementions of young people between 40% and 50%. The number of youth 40% and 50%. The number of youth graduating 40% and 50%. The number of youth graduating into 40% and 50%. The number of youth graduating into the 40% and 50%. The number of youth graduating into the adult 40% and 50%. The number of youth graduating into the adult court 40% and 50%. The number of youth graduating into the adult court has graduating into the adult court has halved graduating into the adult court has halved while graduating into the adult court has halved while we graduating into the adult court has halved while we have graduating into the adult court has halved while we have been graduating into the adult court has halved while we have been in halved while we have been in halved while we have been in halved while we have been in Government and halved while we have been in Government and the halved while we have been in Government and the social halved while we have been in Government and the social investment Government and the social investment approach Government and the social investment approach will Government and the social investment approach will take Government and the social investment approach will take it Government and the social investment approach will take it even Government and the social investment approach will take it even further. approach will take it even further. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! Order! Does <INTERRUPTION> Order! Order! Does she <INTERRUPTION> Order! Order! Does she really <INTERRUPTION> Order! Order! Does she really think Order! Order! Does she really think it Order! Order! Does she really think it is Order! Order! Does she really think it is working Order! Order! Does she really think it is working when Order! Order! Does she really think it is working when robberies it is working when robberies committed it is working when robberies committed by it is working when robberies committed by 15-19-year-olds it is working when robberies committed by 15-19-year-olds in committed by 15-19-year-olds in committed by 15-19-year-olds in committed by 15-19-year-olds in South Auckland committed by 15-19-year-olds in South Auckland is committed by 15-19-year-olds in South Auckland is up committed by 15-19-year-olds in South Auckland is up by committed by 15-19-year-olds in South Auckland is up by 80% committed by 15-19-year-olds in South Auckland is up by 80% and South Auckland is up by 80% and South Auckland is up by 80% and South Auckland is up by 80% and Canterbury is South Auckland is up by 80% and Canterbury is up South Auckland is up by 80% and Canterbury is up by South Auckland is up by 80% and Canterbury is up by 67%, South Auckland is up by 80% and Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Southern Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Southern is Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Southern is up Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Southern is up by Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% Canterbury is up by 67%, Northland up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet there up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet there has up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet there has been up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet there has been a up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet there has been a decrease up by 55%, Southern is up by 45% and yet there has been a decrease in yet there has been a decrease in convictions yet there has been a decrease in convictions in yet there has been a decrease in convictions in courts yet there has been a decrease in convictions in courts for yet there has been a decrease in convictions in courts for that yet there has been a decrease in convictions in courts for that same convictions in courts for that same age convictions in courts for that same age group convictions in courts for that same age group over convictions in courts for that same age group over that convictions in courts for that same age group over that same age group over that same time age group over that same age group over that same time period? We age group over that same time period? We are age group over that same time period? We are very age group over that same time period? We are very well age group over that same time period? We are very well aware age group over that same time period? We are very well aware there period? We are very well aware there period? We are very well aware there period? We are very well aware there has been period? We are very well aware there has been a period? We are very well aware there has been a spike period? We are very well aware there has been a spike in period? We are very well aware there has been a spike in robberies period? We are very well aware there has been a spike in robberies in has been a spike in robberies in has been a spike in robberies in has been a spike in robberies in recent times has been a spike in robberies in recent times but has been a spike in robberies in recent times but what has been a spike in robberies in recent times but what I has been a spike in robberies in recent times but what I would has been a spike in robberies in recent times but what I would say has been a spike in robberies in recent times but what I would say to recent times but what I would say to the recent times but what I would say to the member recent times but what I would say to the member is recent times but what I would say to the member is twofold. recent times but what I would say to the member is twofold. First recent times but what I would say to the member is twofold. First of recent times but what I would say to the member is twofold. First of all the member is twofold. First of all there the member is twofold. First of all there has the member is twofold. First of all there has been the member is twofold. First of all there has been a the member is twofold. First of all there has been a 49% the member is twofold. First of all there has been a 49% reduction the member is twofold. First of all there has been a 49% reduction in there has been a 49% reduction in the there has been a 49% reduction in the number there has been a 49% reduction in the number of there has been a 49% reduction in the number of young there has been a 49% reduction in the number of young people the number of young people the number of young people the number of young people committing serious the number of young people committing serious offences the number of young people committing serious offences and the number of young people committing serious offences and the committing serious offences and the social committing serious offences and the social investment committing serious offences and the social investment approach committing serious offences and the social investment approach is social investment approach is social investment approach is social investment approach is targeting exactly social investment approach is targeting exactly that. social investment approach is targeting exactly that. The targeting exactly that. The difference targeting exactly that. The difference with targeting exactly that. The difference with this targeting exactly that. The difference with this Government targeting exactly that. The difference with this Government is difference with this Government is difference with this Government is difference with this Government is that we difference with this Government is that we have difference with this Government is that we have the difference with this Government is that we have the data, difference with this Government is that we have the data, the difference with this Government is that we have the data, the evidence that we have the data, the evidence base that we have the data, the evidence base and that we have the data, the evidence base and now that we have the data, the evidence base and now the that we have the data, the evidence base and now the funding that we have the data, the evidence base and now the funding to that we have the data, the evidence base and now the funding to make that we have the data, the evidence base and now the funding to make a base and now the funding to make a real base and now the funding to make a real difference base and now the funding to make a real difference about base and now the funding to make a real difference about it. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister for My question is to the Minister for Social My question is to the Minister for Social Housing: My question is to the Minister for Social Housing: Does My question is to the Minister for Social Housing: Does she My question is to the Minister for Social Housing: Does she believe My question is to the Minister for Social Housing: Does she believe an Social Housing: Does she believe an increase Social Housing: Does she believe an increase in Social Housing: Does she believe an increase in the Social Housing: Does she believe an increase in the accommodation increase in the accommodation supplement increase in the accommodation supplement will increase in the accommodation supplement will help increase in the accommodation supplement will help to increase in the accommodation supplement will help to reduce increase in the accommodation supplement will help to reduce the supplement will help to reduce the rate supplement will help to reduce the rate of supplement will help to reduce the rate of rent supplement will help to reduce the rate of rent or supplement will help to reduce the rate of rent or house supplement will help to reduce the rate of rent or house price rate of rent or house price increases? The The accommodation The accommodation supplement The accommodation supplement has The accommodation supplement has never The accommodation supplement has never been The accommodation supplement has never been about The accommodation supplement has never been about trying The accommodation supplement has never been about trying to The accommodation supplement has never been about trying to set The accommodation supplement has never been about trying to set or never been about trying to set or never been about trying to set or never been about trying to set or reduce market never been about trying to set or reduce market rents never been about trying to set or reduce market rents or never been about trying to set or reduce market rents or house never been about trying to set or reduce market rents or house prices reduce market rents or house prices but reduce market rents or house prices but about reduce market rents or house prices but about helping reduce market rents or house prices but about helping people reduce market rents or house prices but about helping people in reduce market rents or house prices but about helping people in need but about helping people in need with but about helping people in need with housing but about helping people in need with housing costs. but about helping people in need with housing costs. What but about helping people in need with housing costs. What I but about helping people in need with housing costs. What I think but about helping people in need with housing costs. What I think the with housing costs. What I think the booth with housing costs. What I think the booth will with housing costs. What I think the booth will do with housing costs. What I think the booth will do is with housing costs. What I think the booth will do is -- with housing costs. What I think the booth will do is -- boost with housing costs. What I think the booth will do is -- boost will with housing costs. What I think the booth will do is -- boost will do with housing costs. What I think the booth will do is -- boost will do is booth will do is -- boost will do is make booth will do is -- boost will do is make life booth will do is -- boost will do is make life easier booth will do is -- boost will do is make life easier for booth will do is -- boost will do is make life easier for the booth will do is -- boost will do is make life easier for the 136,000 make life easier for the 136,000 families make life easier for the 136,000 families that make life easier for the 136,000 families that will make life easier for the 136,000 families that will receive make life easier for the 136,000 families that will receive on families that will receive on average families that will receive on average an families that will receive on average an increase families that will receive on average an increase of families that will receive on average an increase of $36 families that will receive on average an increase of $36 a families that will receive on average an increase of $36 a week average an increase of $36 a week leaving average an increase of $36 a week leaving them average an increase of $36 a week leaving them with average an increase of $36 a week leaving them with more average an increase of $36 a week leaving them with more in average an increase of $36 a week leaving them with more in their leaving them with more in their pockets leaving them with more in their pockets after leaving them with more in their pockets after they leaving them with more in their pockets after they pay leaving them with more in their pockets after they pay their leaving them with more in their pockets after they pay their rent. pockets after they pay their rent. This pockets after they pay their rent. This along pockets after they pay their rent. This along with pockets after they pay their rent. This along with the pockets after they pay their rent. This along with the Family pockets after they pay their rent. This along with the Family Incomes This along with the Family Incomes Package This along with the Family Incomes Package that This along with the Family Incomes Package that every This along with the Family Incomes Package that every party This along with the Family Incomes Package that every party in This along with the Family Incomes Package that every party in this Package that every party in this House Package that every party in this House apart Package that every party in this House apart from Package that every party in this House apart from Labour Package that every party in this House apart from Labour supported House apart from Labour supported last House apart from Labour supported last week House apart from Labour supported last week will House apart from Labour supported last week will make House apart from Labour supported last week will make a House apart from Labour supported last week will make a significant last week will make a significant difference last week will make a significant difference to last week will make a significant difference to millions last week will make a significant difference to millions of last week will make a significant difference to millions of New difference to millions of New Zealanders difference to millions of New Zealanders because difference to millions of New Zealanders because we difference to millions of New Zealanders because we are Zealanders because we are a Zealanders because we are Zealanders because we are a Government that Zealanders because we are a Government that not Zealanders because we are a Government that not only Zealanders because we are a Government that not only cares Zealanders because we are a Government that not only cares about Government that not only cares about these Government that not only cares about these families Government that not only cares about these families but Government that not only cares about these families but does Government that not only cares about these families but does something these families but does something about these families but does something about it. Does Does she Does she accept Does she accept that Does she accept that while Does she accept that while the Does she accept that while the accommodation Does she accept that while the accommodation supplement Does she accept that while the accommodation supplement provide accommodation supplement provide some accommodation supplement provide some relief accommodation supplement provide some relief from accommodation supplement provide some relief from rising accommodation supplement provide some relief from rising rents accommodation supplement provide some relief from rising rents $1.5 some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion a some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion a year some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion a year on some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion a year on rent some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion a year on rent subsidies some relief from rising rents $1.5 billion a year on rent subsidies is billion a year on rent subsidies is fiscally billion a year on rent subsidies is fiscally unsustainable billion a year on rent subsidies is fiscally unsustainable and billion a year on rent subsidies is fiscally unsustainable and shouldn't fiscally unsustainable and shouldn't be fiscally unsustainable and shouldn't be real fiscally unsustainable and shouldn't be real solution fiscally unsustainable and shouldn't be real solution be fiscally unsustainable and shouldn't be real solution be actually be real solution be actually building be real solution be actually building affordable be real solution be actually building affordable homes be real solution be actually building affordable homes or be real solution be actually building affordable homes or didn't building affordable homes or didn't building affordable homes or didn't building affordable homes or didn't the curer building affordable homes or didn't the curer re-- building affordable homes or didn't the curer re-- courier building affordable homes or didn't the curer re-- courier research the curer re-- courier research the curer re-- courier research the curer re-- courier research focus groups the curer re-- courier research focus groups show the curer re-- courier research focus groups show that the curer re-- courier research focus groups show that up? the curer re-- courier research focus groups show that up? Thanks the curer re-- courier research focus groups show that up? Thanks to focus groups show that up? Thanks to the focus groups show that up? Thanks to the sensible focus groups show that up? Thanks to the sensible fiscal focus groups show that up? Thanks to the sensible fiscal management focus groups show that up? Thanks to the sensible fiscal management of the sensible fiscal management of the sensible fiscal management of the sensible fiscal management of this Government the sensible fiscal management of this Government we the sensible fiscal management of this Government we have the sensible fiscal management of this Government we have the this Government we have the resources this Government we have the resources to this Government we have the resources to support this Government we have the resources to support New this Government we have the resources to support New Zealanders resources to support New Zealanders in resources to support New Zealanders in need resources to support New Zealanders in need and resources to support New Zealanders in need and now resources to support New Zealanders in need and now that resources to support New Zealanders in need and now that we resources to support New Zealanders in need and now that we are resources to support New Zealanders in need and now that we are back resources to support New Zealanders in need and now that we are back in in need and now that we are back in surplus in need and now that we are back in surplus this in need and now that we are back in surplus this is in need and now that we are back in surplus this is the in need and now that we are back in surplus this is the first in need and now that we are back in surplus this is the first thing in need and now that we are back in surplus this is the first thing we surplus this is the first thing we surplus this is the first thing we surplus this is the first thing we are doing, surplus this is the first thing we are doing, we surplus this is the first thing we are doing, we are surplus this is the first thing we are doing, we are supporting surplus this is the first thing we are doing, we are supporting New are doing, we are supporting New Zealanders are doing, we are supporting New Zealanders who are doing, we are supporting New Zealanders who need are doing, we are supporting New Zealanders who need an are doing, we are supporting New Zealanders who need an increase are doing, we are supporting New Zealanders who need an increase in Zealanders who need an increase in their Zealanders who need an increase in their accommodation Zealanders who need an increase in their accommodation supplement Zealanders who need an increase in their accommodation supplement as their accommodation supplement as part their accommodation supplement as part of their accommodation supplement as part of a their accommodation supplement as part of a wider their accommodation supplement as part of a wider families their accommodation supplement as part of a wider families income part of a wider families income part of a wider families income part of a wider families income package and part of a wider families income package and for part of a wider families income package and for the part of a wider families income package and for the party part of a wider families income package and for the party who package and for the party who package and for the party who package and for the party who focused against package and for the party who focused against it package and for the party who focused against it to package and for the party who focused against it to lecture package and for the party who focused against it to lecture us package and for the party who focused against it to lecture us on focused against it to lecture us on better focused against it to lecture us on better support focused against it to lecture us on better support when focused against it to lecture us on better support when this focused against it to lecture us on better support when this Government better support when this Government better support when this Government better support when this Government not only better support when this Government not only has better support when this Government not only has a better support when this Government not only has a sustainable, better support when this Government not only has a sustainable, funded, not only has a sustainable, funded, credible not only has a sustainable, funded, credible house not only has a sustainable, funded, credible house building not only has a sustainable, funded, credible house building programme, credible house building programme, we credible house building programme, we are credible house building programme, we are the credible house building programme, we are the ones credible house building programme, we are the ones who credible house building programme, we are the ones who are credible house building programme, we are the ones who are helping credible house building programme, we are the ones who are helping 1.5 we are the ones who are helping 1.5 million we are the ones who are helping 1.5 million New we are the ones who are helping 1.5 million New Zealand we are the ones who are helping 1.5 million New Zealand families we are the ones who are helping 1.5 million New Zealand families while million New Zealand families while Labour million New Zealand families while Labour voted million New Zealand families while Labour voted against million New Zealand families while Labour voted against it. Does Does she Does she accept Does she accept that Does she accept that a Does she accept that a $500 Does she accept that a $500 million Does she accept that a $500 million annual Does she accept that a $500 million annual increase Does she accept that a $500 million annual increase in Does she accept that a $500 million annual increase in accommodation annual increase in accommodation supplement annual increase in accommodation supplement spending annual increase in accommodation supplement spending over annual increase in accommodation supplement spending over nine annual increase in accommodation supplement spending over nine years supplement spending over nine years in supplement spending over nine years in office supplement spending over nine years in office represents supplement spending over nine years in office represents the supplement spending over nine years in office represents the final in office represents the final capitulation in office represents the final capitulation of in office represents the final capitulation of her in office represents the final capitulation of her failed in office represents the final capitulation of her failed housing capitulation of her failed housing policy? capitulation of her failed housing policy? First capitulation of her failed housing policy? First of capitulation of her failed housing policy? First of all capitulation of her failed housing policy? First of all the capitulation of her failed housing policy? First of all the member policy? First of all the member should policy? First of all the member should look policy? First of all the member should look at policy? First of all the member should look at the policy? First of all the member should look at the total policy? First of all the member should look at the total net policy? First of all the member should look at the total net figure should look at the total net figure of should look at the total net figure of the should look at the total net figure of the package should look at the total net figure of the package which should look at the total net figure of the package which is should look at the total net figure of the package which is closer should look at the total net figure of the package which is closer to of the package which is closer to $295 of the package which is closer to $295 million of the package which is closer to $295 million in of the package which is closer to $295 million in accommodation $295 million in accommodation supplement. $295 million in accommodation supplement. Secondly, $295 million in accommodation supplement. Secondly, we $295 million in accommodation supplement. Secondly, we are $295 million in accommodation supplement. Secondly, we are happy supplement. Secondly, we are happy supplement. Secondly, we are happy supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be in supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be in a supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be in a position supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be in a position fiscally supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be in a position fiscally to supplement. Secondly, we are happy to be in a position fiscally to help to be in a position fiscally to help New to be in a position fiscally to help New Zealanders to be in a position fiscally to help New Zealanders in to be in a position fiscally to help New Zealanders in need to be in a position fiscally to help New Zealanders in need with to be in a position fiscally to help New Zealanders in need with their New Zealanders in need with their housing New Zealanders in need with their housing costs. New Zealanders in need with their housing costs. Thirdly, New Zealanders in need with their housing costs. Thirdly, if New Zealanders in need with their housing costs. Thirdly, if only New Zealanders in need with their housing costs. Thirdly, if only we housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't have housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't have to housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't have to have housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't have to have spent housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't have to have spent the housing costs. Thirdly, if only we hadn't have to have spent the past hadn't have to have spent the past eight hadn't have to have spent the past eight years hadn't have to have spent the past eight years fixing hadn't have to have spent the past eight years fixing the hadn't have to have spent the past eight years fixing the fiscal hadn't have to have spent the past eight years fixing the fiscal mess eight years fixing the fiscal mess we eight years fixing the fiscal mess we were left we eight years fixing the fiscal mess we were left we might eight years fixing the fiscal mess we were left we might have eight years fixing the fiscal mess we were left we might have been eight years fixing the fiscal mess we were left we might have been able we were left we might have been able to we were left we might have been able hadn't we were left we might have been able to do it we were left we might have been able to do it sooner. we were left we might have been able to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why is to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why is she to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why is she happy to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why is she happy to to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why is she happy to give to do it sooner. <INTERRUPTION> Order! Why is she happy to give out Order! Why is she happy to give out rental Order! Why is she happy to give out rental subsidies Order! Why is she happy to give out rental subsidies that Order! Why is she happy to give out rental subsidies that ultimately rental subsidies that ultimately benefit rental subsidies that ultimately benefit landlords rental subsidies that ultimately benefit landlords but rental subsidies that ultimately benefit landlords but she rental subsidies that ultimately benefit landlords but she refuses rental subsidies that ultimately benefit landlords but she refuses to benefit landlords but she refuses to benefit landlords but she refuses to benefit landlords but she refuses to build anything benefit landlords but she refuses to build anything like benefit landlords but she refuses to build anything like the benefit landlords but she refuses to build anything like the number benefit landlords but she refuses to build anything like the number of build anything like the number of affordable build anything like the number of affordable homes build anything like the number of affordable homes that build anything like the number of affordable homes that are build anything like the number of affordable homes that are needed. affordable homes that are needed. She affordable homes that are needed. She refuses affordable homes that are needed. She refuses to affordable homes that are needed. She refuses to ban affordable homes that are needed. She refuses to ban foreign affordable homes that are needed. She refuses to ban foreign buyers She refuses to ban foreign buyers and She refuses to ban foreign buyers and she She refuses to ban foreign buyers and she refuses She refuses to ban foreign buyers and she refuses to She refuses to ban foreign buyers and she refuses to reform She refuses to ban foreign buyers and she refuses to reform the and she refuses to reform the planning and she refuses to reform the planning rules and she refuses to reform the planning rules that and she refuses to reform the planning rules that stop and she refuses to reform the planning rules that stop our planning rules that stop our cities planning rules that stop our planning rules that stop our cities from growing? planning rules that stop our cities from growing? <INTERRUPTION> from growing? <INTERRUPTION> from growing? <INTERRUPTION> from growing? <INTERRUPTION> Order! Mr from growing? <INTERRUPTION> Order! Mr Speaker, from growing? <INTERRUPTION> Order! Mr Speaker, first from growing? <INTERRUPTION> Order! Mr Speaker, first of from growing? <INTERRUPTION> Order! Mr Speaker, first of all from growing? <INTERRUPTION> Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as an Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as an individual, Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as an individual, don't Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as an individual, don't do Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as an individual, don't do any Order! Mr Speaker, first of all I, as an individual, don't do any of as an individual, don't do any of these as an individual, don't do any of these things as an individual, don't do any of these things as as an individual, don't do any of these things as parliament as an individual, don't do any of these things as parliament does. these things as parliament does. these things as parliament does. these things as parliament does. This is these things as parliament does. This is the these things as parliament does. This is the Government these things as parliament does. This is the Government that these things as parliament does. This is the Government that has This is the Government that has reformed This is the Government that has reformed the This is the Government that has reformed the planning This is the Government that has reformed the planning laws This is the Government that has reformed the planning laws while reformed the planning laws while Labour reformed the planning laws while Labour voted reformed the planning laws while Labour voted against reformed the planning laws while Labour voted against them. reformed the planning laws while Labour voted against them. This reformed the planning laws while Labour voted against them. This is Labour voted against them. This is the Labour voted against them. This is the Government Labour voted against them. This is the Government that Labour voted against them. This is the Government that is Labour voted against them. This is the Government that is legislating the Government that is legislating developments the Government that is legislating developments like the Government that is legislating developments like the the Government that is legislating developments like the port the Government that is legislating developments like the port England developments like the port England developments like the port England developments like the port England reserve bill developments like the port England reserve bill and developments like the port England reserve bill and the developments like the port England reserve bill and the three developments like the port England reserve bill and the three Kings developments like the port England reserve bill and the three Kings and reserve bill and the three Kings and the reserve bill and the three Kings and the Riccarton reserve bill and the three Kings and the Riccarton racecourse reserve bill and the three Kings and the Riccarton racecourse and reserve bill and the three Kings and the Riccarton racecourse and that the Riccarton racecourse and that Government the Riccarton racecourse and that Government voted the Riccarton racecourse and that Government voted against the Riccarton racecourse and that Government voted against it. the Riccarton racecourse and that Government voted against it. Labour Government voted against it. Labour is Government voted against it. Labour is opposing Government voted against it. Labour is opposing putting Government voted against it. Labour is opposing putting up Government voted against it. Labour is opposing putting up accommodation is opposing putting up accommodation supplements is opposing putting up accommodation supplements and is opposing putting up accommodation supplements and Kiwi is opposing putting up accommodation supplements and Kiwi families is opposing putting up accommodation supplements and Kiwi families that supplements and Kiwi families that rely supplements and Kiwi families that rely on supplements and Kiwi families that rely on them supplements and Kiwi families that rely on them shouldn't supplements and Kiwi families that rely on them shouldn't expect supplements and Kiwi families that rely on them shouldn't expect to supplements and Kiwi families that rely on them shouldn't expect to get rely on them shouldn't expect to get rely on them shouldn't expect to get rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red cent rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red cent if rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red cent if Labour rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red cent if Labour ever rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red cent if Labour ever get rely on them shouldn't expect to get a red cent if Labour ever get into a red cent if Labour ever get into power a red cent if Labour ever get into power is a red cent if Labour ever get into power is what a red cent if Labour ever get into power is what they a red cent if Labour ever get into power is what they should a red cent if Labour ever get into power is what they should take a red cent if Labour ever get into power is what they should take from power is what they should take from power is what they should take from power is what they should take from this line power is what they should take from this line of power is what they should take from this line of questioning. power is what they should take from this line of questioning. What power is what they should take from this line of questioning. What has this line of questioning. What has changed this line of questioning. What has changed since this line of questioning. What has changed since 2015 this line of questioning. What has changed since 2015 when this line of questioning. What has changed since 2015 when the changed since 2015 when the Government changed since 2015 when the Government accepted changed since 2015 when the Government accepted official changed since 2015 when the Government accepted official advice Government accepted official advice Government accepted official advice Government accepted official advice not to Government accepted official advice not to boost Government accepted official advice not to boost the Government accepted official advice not to boost the accommodation not to boost the accommodation supplement not to boost the accommodation supplement because not to boost the accommodation supplement because of not to boost the accommodation supplement because of fears not to boost the accommodation supplement because of fears that supplement because of fears that landlords supplement because of fears that landlords could supplement because of fears that landlords could pocket supplement because of fears that landlords could pocket the supplement because of fears that landlords could pocket the extra landlords could pocket the extra money landlords could pocket the extra money and landlords could pocket the extra money and rents landlords could pocket the extra money and rents could landlords could pocket the extra money and rents could be landlords could pocket the extra money and rents could be pushed landlords could pocket the extra money and rents could be pushed up? money and rents could be pushed up? Since money and rents could be pushed up? Since then money and rents could be pushed up? Since then we've money and rents could be pushed up? Since then we've had money and rents could be pushed up? Since then we've had a money and rents could be pushed up? Since then we've had a piece money and rents could be pushed up? Since then we've had a piece of Since then we've had a piece of research Since then we've had a piece of research from Since then we've had a piece of research from MSD Since then we've had a piece of research from MSD that Since then we've had a piece of research from MSD that has Since then we've had a piece of research from MSD that has looked Since then we've had a piece of research from MSD that has looked at research from MSD that has looked at this research from MSD that has looked at this very research from MSD that has looked at this very carefully research from MSD that has looked at this very carefully and research from MSD that has looked at this very carefully and looked research from MSD that has looked at this very carefully and looked at this very carefully and looked at whether this very carefully and looked at whether there this very carefully and looked at whether there is this very carefully and looked at whether there is any this very carefully and looked at whether there is any evidence this very carefully and looked at whether there is any evidence that whether there is any evidence that the whether there is any evidence that the last whether there is any evidence that the last round whether there is any evidence that the last round of whether there is any evidence that the last round of accommodation the last round of accommodation supplement the last round of accommodation supplement increases the last round of accommodation supplement increases did the last round of accommodation supplement increases did lead supplement increases did lead to supplement increases did lead supplement increases did lead to rent increases supplement increases did lead to rent increases and supplement increases did lead to rent increases and found supplement increases did lead to rent increases and found no supplement increases did lead to rent increases and found no such rent increases and found no such evidence rent increases and found no such evidence and rent increases and found no such evidence and as rent increases and found no such evidence and as a rent increases and found no such evidence and as a consequence rent increases and found no such evidence and as a consequence we evidence and as a consequence we were evidence and as a consequence we were happy evidence and as a consequence we were happy to evidence and as a consequence we were happy to take evidence and as a consequence we were happy to take that evidence and as a consequence we were happy to take that advice evidence and as a consequence we were happy to take that advice and were happy to take that advice and give were happy to take that advice and give a were happy to take that advice and give a little were happy to take that advice and give a little bit were happy to take that advice and give a little bit of were happy to take that advice and give a little bit of money were happy to take that advice and give a little bit of money to were happy to take that advice and give a little bit of money to the give a little bit of money to the New give a little bit of money to the New Zealanders give a little bit of money to the New Zealanders who give a little bit of money to the New Zealanders who need give a little bit of money to the New Zealanders who need it, New Zealanders who need it, something New Zealanders who need it, something they New Zealanders who need it, something they clearly New Zealanders who need it, something they clearly shouldn't something they clearly shouldn't something they clearly shouldn't something they clearly shouldn't expect from something they clearly shouldn't expect from Labour. something they clearly shouldn't expect from Labour. I something they clearly shouldn't expect from Labour. I just something they clearly shouldn't expect from Labour. I just ask expect from Labour. I just ask expect from Labour. I just ask expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to be expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to be honest expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to be honest and expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to be honest and tell expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to be honest and tell us expect from Labour. I just ask Labour to be honest and tell us that Labour to be honest and tell us that they Labour to be honest and tell us that they will Labour to be honest and tell us that they will reverse Labour to be honest and tell us that they will reverse them. they will reverse them. <INTERRUPTION> <INTERRUPTION> Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! That Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! That particular Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! That particular question Order! <INTERRUPTION> Order! That particular question has Order! That particular question has now Order! That particular question has now been Order! That particular question has now been asked Order! That particular question has now been asked and Order! That particular question has now been asked and answered. Order! That particular question has now been asked and answered. I Order! That particular question has now been asked and answered. I don't now been asked and answered. I don't want now been asked and answered. I don't want to now been asked and answered. I don't want to have now been asked and answered. I don't want to have to now been asked and answered. I don't want to have to ask now been asked and answered. I don't want to have to ask a now been asked and answered. I don't want to have to ask a minister now been asked and answered. I don't want to have to ask a minister to want to have to ask a minister to stop want to have to ask a minister to stop interjecting want to have to ask a minister to stop interjecting again. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister for My question is to the Minister for Children: My question is to the Minister for Children: What My question is to the Minister for Children: What recent My question is to the Minister for Children: What recent announcements Children: What recent announcements has Children: What recent announcements has she Children: What recent announcements has she made Children: What recent announcements has she made regarding Children: What recent announcements has she made regarding funding Children: What recent announcements has she made regarding funding to has she made regarding funding to support has she made regarding funding to support vulnerable has she made regarding funding to support vulnerable children has she made regarding funding to support vulnerable children and support vulnerable children and young support vulnerable children and young people? Last Last week Last week as Last week as part Last week as part of Last week as part of Budget Last week as part of Budget 2017 Last week as part of Budget 2017 I Last week as part of Budget 2017 I announced Last week as part of Budget 2017 I announced that Last week as part of Budget 2017 I announced that this Last week as part of Budget 2017 I announced that this Government Last week as part of Budget 2017 I announced that this Government is announced that this Government is investing announced that this Government is investing another announced that this Government is investing another $434.1 announced that this Government is investing another $434.1 million announced that this Government is investing another $434.1 million in investing another $434.1 million in new investing another $434.1 million in new initiatives investing another $434.1 million in new initiatives to investing another $434.1 million in new initiatives to support new initiatives to support new initiatives to support new initiatives to support vulnerable children new initiatives to support vulnerable children and new initiatives to support vulnerable children and young new initiatives to support vulnerable children and young people vulnerable children and young people vulnerable vulnerable children and young people through the Ministry vulnerable children and young people through the Ministry for vulnerable children and young people through the Ministry for Vulnerable through the Ministry for Vulnerable Children, through the Ministry for Vulnerable Children, Oranga through the Ministry for Vulnerable Children, Oranga Tamariki. through the Ministry for Vulnerable Children, Oranga Tamariki. This Children, Oranga Tamariki. This Children, Oranga Tamariki. This Children, Oranga Tamariki. This means that Children, Oranga Tamariki. This means that the Children, Oranga Tamariki. This means that the Government Children, Oranga Tamariki. This means that the Government through means that the Government through Oranga means that the Government through Oranga Tamariki means that the Government through Oranga Tamariki is means that the Government through Oranga Tamariki is spending means that the Government through Oranga Tamariki is spending a means that the Government through Oranga Tamariki is spending a total Oranga Tamariki is spending a total of Oranga Tamariki is spending a total of $157.7 Oranga Tamariki is spending a total of $157.7 million Oranga Tamariki is spending a total of $157.7 million on Oranga Tamariki is spending a total of $157.7 million on the Oranga Tamariki is spending a total of $157.7 million on the commissions of $157.7 million on the commissions and of $157.7 million on the commissions and delivering of $157.7 million on the commissions and delivering of of $157.7 million on the commissions and delivering of child-centred and delivering of child-centred and delivering of child-centred and delivering of child-centred services. This and delivering of child-centred services. This new and delivering of child-centred services. This new ministries services. This new ministries funding services. This new ministries funding will services. This new ministries funding will be services. This new ministries funding will be 18% services. This new ministries funding will be 18% higher services. This new ministries funding will be 18% higher than services. This new ministries funding will be 18% higher than two funding will be 18% higher than two years funding will be 18% higher than two years ago funding will be 18% higher than two years ago when funding will be 18% higher than two years ago when it funding will be 18% higher than two years ago when it was funding will be 18% higher than two years ago when it was part funding will be 18% higher than two years ago when it was part of funding will be 18% higher than two years ago when it was part of the years ago when it was part of the ministry years ago when it was part of the ministry for years ago when it was part of the ministry for social years ago when it was part of the ministry for social development. years ago when it was part of the ministry for social development. The ministry for social development. The funding ministry for social development. The funding will ministry for social development. The funding will support ministry for social development. The funding will support the funding will support the radical funding will support the funding will support the radical overhaul of funding will support the radical overhaul of care funding will support the radical overhaul of care and funding will support the radical overhaul of care and protection funding will support the radical overhaul of care and protection in overhaul of care and protection in New overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and is overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and is part overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and is part of overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and is part of a overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and is part of a four overhaul of care and protection in New Zealand and is part of a four to New Zealand and is part of a four to five New Zealand and is part of a four to five year New Zealand and is part of a four to five year transformation New Zealand and is part of a four to five year transformation programme five year transformation programme to five year transformation programme to build five year transformation programme to build a five year transformation programme to build a system five year transformation programme to build a system that five year transformation programme to build a system that is five year transformation programme to build a system that is focused five year transformation programme to build a system that is focused on to build a system that is focused on prevention to build a system that is focused on prevention and to build a system that is focused on prevention and early to build a system that is focused on prevention and early intervention. What What does What does this What does this funding What does this funding mean What does this funding mean for What does this funding mean for caregivers What does this funding mean for caregivers of What does this funding mean for caregivers of children What does this funding mean for caregivers of children in What does this funding mean for caregivers of children in care? caregivers of children in care? Budget caregivers of children in care? Budget 2017 caregivers of children in care? Budget 2017 sees caregivers of children in care? Budget 2017 sees an caregivers of children in care? Budget 2017 sees an extra caregivers of children in care? Budget 2017 sees an extra $26.4 Budget 2017 sees an extra $26.4 million Budget 2017 sees an extra $26.4 million for Budget 2017 sees an extra $26.4 million for a Budget 2017 sees an extra $26.4 million for a caregiver Budget 2017 sees an extra $26.4 million for a caregiver support million for a caregiver support package million for a caregiver support package which million for a caregiver support package which will million for a caregiver support package which will see million for a caregiver support package which will see the package which will see the Government package which will see the Government provide package which will see the Government provide more package which will see the Government provide more support package which will see the Government provide more support to Government provide more support to around Government provide more support to around 4,500 Government provide more support to around 4,500 caregivers. Government provide more support to around 4,500 caregivers. Working around 4,500 caregivers. Working with around 4,500 caregivers. Working with care around 4,500 caregivers. Working with care fiscal around 4,500 caregivers. Working with care fiscal cliffers around 4,500 caregivers. Working with care fiscal cliffers they around 4,500 caregivers. Working with care fiscal cliffers they have with care fiscal cliffers they have with care fiscal cliffers they have with care fiscal cliffers they have -- caregivers with care fiscal cliffers they have -- caregivers they with care fiscal cliffers they have -- caregivers they have with care fiscal cliffers they have -- caregivers they have told with care fiscal cliffers they have -- caregivers they have told us with care fiscal cliffers they have -- caregivers they have told us they -- caregivers they have told us they want -- caregivers they have told us they want a -- caregivers they have told us they want a 24/7 -- caregivers they have told us they want a 24/7 service, -- caregivers they have told us they want a 24/7 service, more -- caregivers they have told us they want a 24/7 service, more targeted want a 24/7 service, more targeted training, want a 24/7 service, more targeted training, more want a 24/7 service, more targeted training, more support want a 24/7 service, more targeted training, more support for want a 24/7 service, more targeted training, more support for children training, more support for children with training, more support for children with higher training, more support for children with higher needs, training, more support for children with higher needs, for training, more support for children with higher needs, for effective with higher needs, for effective recruitment with higher needs, for effective recruitment and with higher needs, for effective recruitment and retention with higher needs, for effective recruitment and retention strategies recruitment and retention strategies recruitment and retention strategies recruitment and retention strategies and this recruitment and retention strategies and this is recruitment and retention strategies and this is what recruitment and retention strategies and this is what this recruitment and retention strategies and this is what this Government recruitment and retention strategies and this is what this Government has and this is what this Government has delivered and this is what this Government has delivered in and this is what this Government has delivered in Budget and this is what this Government has delivered in Budget 2017. and this is what this Government has delivered in Budget 2017. Point and this is what this Government has delivered in Budget 2017. Point of delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. I delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. I suspect delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. I suspect the delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. I suspect the minister delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. I suspect the minister may delivered in Budget 2017. Point of order. I suspect the minister may be order. I suspect the minister may be reading order. I suspect the minister may be reading from order. I suspect the minister may be reading from an order. I suspect the minister may be reading from an official order. I suspect the minister may be reading from an official document order. I suspect the minister may be reading from an official document in reading from an official document in which reading from an official document in which case reading from an official document in which case I'm reading from an official document in which case I'm asking reading from an official document in which case I'm asking her reading from an official document in which case I'm asking her to reading from an official document in which case I'm asking her to table which case I'm asking her to table it which case I'm asking her to table it so which case I'm asking her to table it so I which case I'm asking her to table it so I can which case I'm asking her to table it so I can hand which case I'm asking her to table it so I can hand it which case I'm asking her to table it so I can hand it on which case I'm asking her to table it so I can hand it on to which case I'm asking her to table it so I can hand it on to the which case I'm asking her to table it so I can hand it on to the member which case I'm asking her to table which which case I'm asking her to table who asked the which case I'm asking her to table who asked the question which case I'm asking her to table who asked the question in which case I'm asking her to table who asked the question in the which case I'm asking her to table who asked the question in the first who asked the question in the first place. who asked the question in the first place. Order! who asked the question in the first place. Order! Is who asked the question in the first place. Order! Is the who asked the question in the first place. Order! Is the minister place. Order! Is the minister place. Order! Is the minister place. Order! Is the minister quoting from place. Order! Is the minister quoting from an place. Order! Is the minister quoting from an official place. Order! Is the minister quoting from an official document? quoting from an official document? No, quoting from an official document? No, she quoting from an official document? No, she was quoting from an official document? No, she was not. quoting from an official document? No, she was not. Question quoting from an official document? No, she was not. Question No. quoting from an official document? No, she was not. Question No. 10. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister of My question is to the Minister of Education: My question is to the Minister of Education: What My question is to the Minister of Education: What was My question is to the Minister of Education: What was the My question is to the Minister of Education: What was the change My question is to the Minister of Education: What was the change in Education: What was the change in real Education: What was the change in real terms Education: What was the change in real terms in Education: What was the change in real terms in total Education: What was the change in real terms in total annual real terms in total annual Government real terms in total annual Government funding real terms in total annual Government funding per real terms in total annual Government funding per full-time Government funding per full-time equivalent Government funding per full-time equivalent child Government funding per full-time equivalent child in Government funding per full-time equivalent child in early Government funding per full-time equivalent child in early childhood equivalent child in early childhood education equivalent child in early childhood education between equivalent child in early childhood education between 2009/10 equivalent child in early childhood education between 2009/10 and education between 2009/10 and 2014/15 education between 2009/10 and 2014/15 according education between 2009/10 and 2014/15 according to education between 2009/10 and 2014/15 according to the education between 2009/10 and 2014/15 according to the data education between 2009/10 and 2014/15 according to the data posted 2014/15 according to the data posted on 2014/15 according to the data posted on the 2014/15 according to the data posted on the Education 2014/15 according to the data posted on the Education Counts 2014/15 according to the data posted on the Education Counts website? On On behalf On behalf of On behalf of the On behalf of the Minister On behalf of the Minister of On behalf of the Minister of Education On behalf of the Minister of Education I'm On behalf of the Minister of Education I'm advised On behalf of the Minister of Education I'm advised that On behalf of the Minister of Education I'm advised that in On behalf of the Minister of Education I'm advised that in real Education I'm advised that in real terms Education I'm advised that in real terms entitlement Education I'm advised that in real terms entitlement and Education I'm advised that in real terms entitlement and equity Education I'm advised that in real terms entitlement and equity funding terms entitlement and equity funding to terms entitlement and equity funding to providers terms entitlement and equity funding to providers per terms entitlement and equity funding to providers per full-time to providers per full-time equivalent to providers per full-time equivalent child to providers per full-time equivalent child in to providers per full-time equivalent child in 2009/10 to providers per full-time equivalent child in 2009/10 was equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 and equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 and in equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 and in 2014/16 equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 and in 2014/16 was equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. equivalent child in 2009/10 was 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an increase 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an increase of 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an increase of 0.1 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an increase of 0.1 2%. 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an increase of 0.1 2%. As 8,467 and in 2014/16 was 8,486. This is an increase of 0.1 2%. As a is an increase of 0.1 2%. As a Government is an increase of 0.1 2%. As a Government we is an increase of 0.1 2%. As a Government we are is an increase of 0.1 2%. As a Government we are focused is an increase of 0.1 2%. As a Government we are focused on Government we are focused on ensuring Government we are focused on ensuring that Government we are focused on ensuring that all Government we are focused on ensuring that all children Government we are focused on ensuring that all children get Government we are focused on ensuring that all children get the ensuring that all children get the best ensuring that all children get the best start ensuring that all children get the best start to ensuring that all children get the best start to life ensuring that all children get the best start to life by ensuring that all children get the best start to life by participating best start to life by participating best start to life by participating best start to life by participating in quality best start to life by participating in quality early best start to life by participating in quality early childhood best start to life by participating in quality early childhood education in quality early childhood education in quality early childhood education in quality early childhood education before attending in quality early childhood education before attending school. in quality early childhood education before attending school. This in quality early childhood education before attending school. This is before attending school. This is particularly before attending school. This is particularly important before attending school. This is particularly important for before attending school. This is particularly important for those particularly important for those particularly important for those particularly important for those young people particularly important for those young people most particularly important for those young people most at particularly important for those young people most at risk. particularly important for those young people most at risk. I'm particularly important for those young people most at risk. I'm also young people most at risk. I'm also advised young people most at risk. I'm also advised that young people most at risk. I'm also advised that the young people most at risk. I'm also advised that the total young people most at risk. I'm also advised that the total annual advised that the total annual Government advised that the total annual Government funding advised that the total annual Government funding per advised that the total annual Government funding per FTE, advised that the total annual Government funding per FTE, which Government funding per FTE, which includes Government funding per FTE, which includes things Government funding per FTE, which includes things as Government funding per FTE, which includes things as participation includes things as participation programmes includes things as participation programmes is includes things as participation programmes is a includes things as participation programmes is a difference includes things as participation programmes is a difference of includes things as participation programmes is a difference of minus programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. Why programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. Why didn't programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. Why didn't she programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. Why didn't she point programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. Why didn't she point out programmes is a difference of minus 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her answer 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her answer to 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her answer to the 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her answer to the question 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her answer to the question on 1.67%. Why didn't she point out in her answer to the question on total her answer to the question on total Government her answer to the question on total Government funding her answer to the question on total Government funding per her answer to the question on total Government funding per child her answer to the question on total Government funding per child for Government funding per child for Government funding per child for Government funding per child for early childhood Government funding per child for early childhood addcation Government funding per child for early childhood addcation that Government funding per child for early childhood addcation that that early childhood addcation that that figure early childhood addcation that that figure has early childhood addcation that that figure has declined early childhood addcation that that figure has declined by early childhood addcation that that figure has declined by $538 early childhood addcation that that figure has declined by $538 per figure has declined by $538 per child, figure has declined by $538 per child, per figure has declined by $538 per child, per year, figure has declined by $538 per child, per year, during figure has declined by $538 per child, per year, during the figure has declined by $538 per child, per year, during the time child, per year, during the time period child, per year, during the time period in child, per year, during the time period in question? child, per year, during the time period in question? I child, per year, during the time period in question? I quoted child, per year, during the time period in question? I quoted the period in question? I quoted the figures period in question? I quoted the figures that period in question? I quoted the figures that I period in question? I quoted the figures that I was period in question? I quoted the figures that I was given period in question? I quoted the figures that I was given on period in question? I quoted the figures that I was given on advice figures that I was given on advice in figures that I was given on advice in answer figures that I was given on advice in answer to figures that I was given on advice in answer to the figures that I was given on advice in answer to the primary figures that I was given on advice in answer to the primary question. in answer to the primary question. However, in answer to the primary question. However, I in answer to the primary question. However, I would in answer to the primary question. However, I would point in answer to the primary question. However, I would point out in answer to the primary question. However, I would point out to in answer to the primary question. However, I would point out to the However, I would point out to the member However, I would point out to the member that However, I would point out to the member that ECE However, I would point out to the member that ECE funding However, I would point out to the member that ECE funding has member that ECE funding has increased member that ECE funding has increased every member that ECE funding has increased every year member that ECE funding has increased every year under member that ECE funding has increased every year under this increased every year under this Government increased every year under this Government and increased every year under this Government and that increased every year under this Government and that for increased every year under this Government and that for every increased every year under this Government and that for every $1 increased every year under this Government and that for every $1 a Government and that for every $1 a parent Government and that for every $1 a parent spend Government and that for every $1 a parent spend on Government and that for every $1 a parent spend on early Government and that for every $1 a parent spend on early childhood parent spend on early childhood education, parent spend on early childhood education, the parent spend on early childhood education, the Government parent spend on early childhood education, the Government spends education, the Government spends education, the Government spends education, the Government spends approximately $4.80. education, the Government spends approximately $4.80. Does education, the Government spends approximately $4.80. Does she approximately $4.80. Does she believe approximately $4.80. Does she believe that approximately $4.80. Does she believe that cutting approximately $4.80. Does she believe that cutting more approximately $4.80. Does she believe that cutting more than approximately $4.80. Does she believe that cutting more than $500 believe that cutting more than $500 per believe that cutting more than $500 per child, believe that cutting more than $500 per child, per believe that cutting more than $500 per child, per year, believe that cutting more than $500 per child, per year, from believe that cutting more than $500 per child, per year, from total per child, per year, from total Government per child, per year, from total Government funding per child, per year, from total Government funding for per child, per year, from total Government funding for early Government funding for early childhood Government funding for early childhood education Government funding for early childhood education has Government funding for early childhood education has made Government funding for early childhood education has made it childhood education has made it childhood education has made it childhood education has made it easier or childhood education has made it easier or harder childhood education has made it easier or harder for childhood education has made it easier or harder for parents childhood education has made it easier or harder for parents to easier or harder for parents to afford easier or harder for parents to afford early easier or harder for parents to afford early childhood easier or harder for parents to afford early childhood education easier or harder for parents to afford early childhood education for afford early childhood education for their afford early childhood education for their kids? afford early childhood education for their kids? I afford early childhood education for their kids? I repeat, afford early childhood education for their kids? I repeat, this their kids? I repeat, this Government their kids? I repeat, this Government has their kids? I repeat, this Government has been their kids? I repeat, this Government has been focused their kids? I repeat, this Government has been focused on Government has been focused on ensuring Government has been focused on ensuring that Government has been focused on ensuring that all Government has been focused on ensuring that all New Government has been focused on ensuring that all New Zealand ensuring that all New Zealand ensuring that all New Zealand ensuring that all New Zealand children are ensuring that all New Zealand children are able ensuring that all New Zealand children are able to ensuring that all New Zealand children are able to readily ensuring that all New Zealand children are able to readily access children are able to readily access a children are able to readily access a variety children are able to readily access a variety of children are able to readily access a variety of types children are able to readily access a variety of types of children are able to readily access a variety of types of early a variety of types of early childhood a variety of types of early childhood education. a variety of types of early childhood education. We a variety of types of early childhood education. We have a variety of types of early childhood education. We have focused childhood education. We have focused on childhood education. We have focused on ensuring childhood education. We have focused on ensuring that childhood education. We have focused on ensuring that children childhood education. We have focused on ensuring that children are childhood education. We have focused on ensuring that children are able on ensuring that children are able to on ensuring that children are able to participate on ensuring that children are able to participate and on ensuring that children are able to participate and we on ensuring that children are able to participate and we have on ensuring that children are able to participate and we have increased to participate and we have increased the to participate and we have increased the funding to participate and we have increased the funding for to participate and we have increased the funding for ECE to participate and we have increased the funding for ECE every to participate and we have increased the funding for ECE every year to participate and we have increased the funding for ECE every year since the funding for ECE every year since we the funding for ECE every year since we have the funding for ECE every year since we have been the funding for ECE every year since we have been in the funding for ECE every year since we have been in Government. the funding for ECE every year since we have been in Government. By the funding for ECE every year since we have been in Government. By the we have been in Government. By the year we have been in Government. By the year 2020 we have been in Government. By the year 2020 it we have been in Government. By the year 2020 it will we have been in Government. By the year 2020 it will reach we have been in Government. By the year 2020 it will reach $2 we have been in Government. By the year 2020 it will reach $2 billion year 2020 it will reach $2 billion that year 2020 it will reach $2 billion that the year 2020 it will reach $2 billion that the taxpayers year 2020 it will reach $2 billion that the taxpayers invest year 2020 it will reach $2 billion that the taxpayers invest in year 2020 it will reach $2 billion that the taxpayers invest in early that the taxpayers invest in early childhood that the taxpayers invest in early childhood education. that the taxpayers invest in early childhood education. Is that the taxpayers invest in early childhood education. Is she that the taxpayers invest in early childhood education. Is she aware childhood education. Is she aware that childhood education. Is she aware that Statistics childhood education. Is she aware that Statistics NZ childhood education. Is she aware that Statistics NZ data childhood education. Is she aware that Statistics NZ data shows childhood education. Is she aware that Statistics NZ data shows that that Statistics NZ data shows that parents that Statistics NZ data shows that parents have that Statistics NZ data shows that parents have been that Statistics NZ data shows that parents have been forced that Statistics NZ data shows that parents have been forced to that Statistics NZ data shows that parents have been forced to pay that Statistics NZ data shows that parents have been forced to pay 25% parents have been forced to pay 25% more parents have been forced to pay 25% more for parents have been forced to pay 25% more for early parents have been forced to pay 25% more for early childhood parents have been forced to pay 25% more for early childhood education more for early childhood education more for early childhood education more for early childhood education over the more for early childhood education over the time more for early childhood education over the time period more for early childhood education over the time period in more for early childhood education over the time period in question? more for early childhood education over the time period in question? If over the time period in question? If over the time period in question? If over the time period in question? If so, does over the time period in question? If so, does she over the time period in question? If so, does she think over the time period in question? If so, does she think that over the time period in question? If so, does she think that that over the time period in question? If so, does she think that that is over the time period in question? If so, does she think that that is a so, does she think that that is a sign so, does she think that that is a sign that so, does she think that that is a sign that early so, does she think that that is a sign that early childhood so, does she think that that is a sign that early childhood education sign that early childhood education is sign that early childhood education is becoming sign that early childhood education is becoming more sign that early childhood education is becoming more or sign that early childhood education is becoming more or less sign that early childhood education is becoming more or less affordable is becoming more or less affordable under is becoming more or less affordable under a is becoming more or less affordable under a National is becoming more or less affordable under a National Government? is becoming more or less affordable under a National Government? I is becoming more or less affordable under a National Government? I am under a National Government? I am advised under a National Government? I am advised that under a National Government? I am advised that early under a National Government? I am advised that early learning under a National Government? I am advised that early learning is under a National Government? I am advised that early learning is 33% advised that early learning is 33% advised that early learning is 33% advised that early learning is 33% more affordable advised that early learning is 33% more affordable for advised that early learning is 33% more affordable for parents advised that early learning is 33% more affordable for parents and more affordable for parents and families more affordable for parents and families than more affordable for parents and families than in more affordable for parents and families than in June more affordable for parents and families than in June 2007. Which Which is Which is she Which is she more Which is she more proud Which is she more proud of Which is she more proud of when Which is she more proud of when it Which is she more proud of when it comes Which is she more proud of when it comes to Which is she more proud of when it comes to early Which is she more proud of when it comes to early childhood Which is she more proud of when it comes to early childhood education, comes to early childhood education, her comes to early childhood education, her Government's comes to early childhood education, her Government's freeze comes to early childhood education, her Government's freeze on her Government's freeze on subsidies, her Government's freeze on subsidies, the her Government's freeze on subsidies, the corresponding her Government's freeze on subsidies, the corresponding mess her Government's freeze on subsidies, the corresponding mess of subsidies, the corresponding mess of subsidies, the corresponding mess of subsidies, the corresponding mess of increases in subsidies, the corresponding mess of increases in which subsidies, the corresponding mess of increases in which parents subsidies, the corresponding mess of increases in which parents are increases in which parents are paying increases in which parents are paying or increases in which parents are paying or her increases in which parents are paying or her Governments increases in which parents are paying or her Governments removal increases in which parents are paying or her Governments removal of paying or her Governments removal of paying or her Governments removal of paying or her Governments removal of the requirement paying or her Governments removal of the requirement for paying or her Governments removal of the requirement for 100% paying or her Governments removal of the requirement for 100% qualified the requirement for 100% qualified teachers the requirement for 100% qualified teachers which the requirement for 100% qualified teachers which saved the requirement for 100% qualified teachers which saved them the requirement for 100% qualified teachers which saved them more the requirement for 100% qualified teachers which saved them more than teachers which saved them more than $200 teachers which saved them more than $200 million teachers which saved them more than $200 million alone? teachers which saved them more than $200 million alone? This teachers which saved them more than $200 million alone? This Government $200 million alone? This Government is $200 million alone? This Government is proud $200 million alone? This Government is proud of $200 million alone? This Government is proud of the $200 million alone? This Government is proud of the fact $200 million alone? This Government is proud of the fact that $200 million alone? This Government is proud of the fact that we $200 million alone? This Government is proud of the fact that we have is proud of the fact that we have focused is proud of the fact that we have focused on is proud of the fact that we have focused on ensuring is proud of the fact that we have focused on ensuring that is proud of the fact that we have focused on ensuring that the is proud of the fact that we have focused on ensuring that the most focused on ensuring that the most young focused on ensuring that the most young New focused on ensuring that the most young New Zealanders focused on ensuring that the most young New Zealanders get focused on ensuring that the most young New Zealanders get access focused on ensuring that the most young New Zealanders get access to young New Zealanders get access to high-quality, young New Zealanders get access to high-quality, early young New Zealanders get access to high-quality, early childhood high-quality, early childhood high-quality, early childhood high-quality, early childhood education and high-quality, early childhood education and that high-quality, early childhood education and that we high-quality, early childhood education and that we target high-quality, early childhood education and that we target those education and that we target those who education and that we target those who are education and that we target those who are most education and that we target those who are most likely education and that we target those who are most likely not education and that we target those who are most likely not to education and that we target those who are most likely not to access who are most likely not to access early who are most likely not to access early childhood who are most likely not to access early childhood education who are most likely not to access early childhood education because who are most likely not to access early childhood education because we early childhood education because we early childhood education because we early childhood education because we know, and early childhood education because we know, and the early childhood education because we know, and the evidence early childhood education because we know, and the evidence is early childhood education because we know, and the evidence is clear, know, and the evidence is clear, both know, and the evidence is clear, both nationally know, and the evidence is clear, both nationally and know, and the evidence is clear, both nationally and internationally, both nationally and internationally, that both nationally and internationally, that that both nationally and internationally, that that gives both nationally and internationally, that that gives them both nationally and internationally, that that gives them the both nationally and internationally, that that gives them the very both nationally and internationally, that that gives them the very best that that gives them the very best start that that gives them the very best start in that that gives them the very best start in life. I I seek I seek leave I seek leave to I seek leave to have I seek leave to have this I seek leave to have this question I seek leave to have this question redirected I seek leave to have this question redirected to I seek leave to have this question redirected to the I seek leave to have this question redirected to the PM, I seek leave to have this question redirected to the PM, to I seek leave to have this question redirected to the PM, to whom I seek leave to have this question redirected to the PM, to whom it I seek leave to have this question redirected to the PM, to whom it was redirected to the PM, to whom it was originally redirected to the PM, to whom it was originally directed. redirected to the PM, to whom it was originally directed. Order! redirected to the PM, to whom it was originally directed. Order! I redirected to the PM, to whom it was originally directed. Order! I was originally directed. Order! I was unaware originally directed. Order! I was unaware that originally directed. Order! I was unaware that this originally directed. Order! I was unaware that this has originally directed. Order! I was unaware that this has been unaware that this has been transferred unaware that this has been transferred but unaware that this has been transferred but I unaware that this has been transferred but I have unaware that this has been transferred but I have ruled unaware that this has been transferred but I have ruled on unaware that this has been transferred but I have ruled on many transferred but I have ruled on many occasions transferred but I have ruled on many occasions that transferred but I have ruled on many occasions that it transferred but I have ruled on many occasions that it is transferred but I have ruled on many occasions that it is the occasions that it is the Government's occasions that it is the Government's duty, occasions that it is the Government's duty, in occasions that it is the Government's duty, in fact Government's duty, in fact Government's duty, in fact Government's duty, in fact responsibility, to Government's duty, in fact responsibility, to determine Government's duty, in fact responsibility, to determine who responsibility, to determine who will responsibility, to determine who will answer responsibility, to determine who will answer the responsibility, to determine who will answer the question. responsibility, to determine who will answer the question. The will answer the question. The question will answer the question. The question is will answer the question. The question is down will answer the question. The question is down to will answer the question. The question is down to the will answer the question. The question is down to the Minister will answer the question. The question is down to the Minister of question is down to the Minister of Climate question is down to the Minister of Climate Change question is down to the Minister of Climate Change Issues question is down to the Minister of Climate Change Issues and question is down to the Minister of Climate Change Issues and that question is down to the Minister of Climate Change Issues and that is Climate Change Issues and that is who Climate Change Issues and that is who it Climate Change Issues and that is who it is Climate Change Issues and that is who it is to Climate Change Issues and that is who it is to be Climate Change Issues and that is who it is to be addressed Climate Change Issues and that is who it is to be addressed to. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister for My question is to the Minister for Climate My question is to the Minister for Climate Change My question is to the Minister for Climate Change Issues: My question is to the Minister for Climate Change Issues: Does My question is to the Minister for Climate Change Issues: Does she Climate Change Issues: Does she agree Climate Change Issues: Does she agree that Climate Change Issues: Does she agree that countries Climate Change Issues: Does she agree that countries need Climate Change Issues: Does she agree that countries need to Climate Change Issues: Does she agree that countries need to work agree that countries need to work together agree that countries need to work together to agree that countries need to work together to combat agree that countries need to work together to combat dangerous agree that countries need to work together to combat dangerous climate together to combat dangerous climate change; together to combat dangerous climate change; if together to combat dangerous climate change; if so, together to combat dangerous climate change; if so, will together to combat dangerous climate change; if so, will her together to combat dangerous climate change; if so, will her Government change; if so, will her Government convey change; if so, will her Government convey that change; if so, will her Government convey that view change; if so, will her Government convey that view to change; if so, will her Government convey that view to the change; if so, will her Government convey that view to the President change; if so, will her Government convey that view to the President of convey that view to the President of the convey that view to the President of the United convey that view to the President of the United States convey that view to the President of the United States this convey that view to the President of the United States this week? Mr Mr Speaker, Mr Speaker, I Mr Speaker, I do Mr Speaker, I do agree Mr Speaker, I do agree that Mr Speaker, I do agree that it Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is - Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is - that Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is - that countries Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is - that countries need Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is - that countries need to Mr Speaker, I do agree that it is - that countries need to work that countries need to work together. that countries need to work together. New that countries need to work together. New Zealand that countries need to work together. New Zealand wants that countries need to work together. New Zealand wants all together. New Zealand wants all together. New Zealand wants all together. New Zealand wants all countries, including together. New Zealand wants all countries, including the together. New Zealand wants all countries, including the US, together. New Zealand wants all countries, including the US, to together. New Zealand wants all countries, including the US, to stay countries, including the US, to stay in countries, including the US, to stay in the countries, including the US, to stay in the agreement. countries, including the US, to stay in the agreement. Our countries, including the US, to stay in the agreement. Our position countries, including the US, to stay in the agreement. Our position on in the agreement. Our position on in the agreement. Our position on in the agreement. Our position on that has in the agreement. Our position on that has been in the agreement. Our position on that has been clear in the agreement. Our position on that has been clear and in the agreement. Our position on that has been clear and we in the agreement. Our position on that has been clear and we do in the agreement. Our position on that has been clear and we do not that has been clear and we do not that has been clear and we do not that has been clear and we do not plan on that has been clear and we do not plan on reiterating that has been clear and we do not plan on reiterating that that has been clear and we do not plan on reiterating that to that has been clear and we do not plan on reiterating that to the plan on reiterating that to the President plan on reiterating that to the President this plan on reiterating that to the President this week. plan on reiterating that to the President this week. Does plan on reiterating that to the President this week. Does the President this week. Does the minister President this week. Does the minister agree President this week. Does the minister agree that President this week. Does the minister agree that as President this week. Does the minister agree that as minister President this week. Does the minister agree that as minister she minister agree that as minister she has minister agree that as minister she has a minister agree that as minister she has a duty minister agree that as minister she has a duty of minister agree that as minister she has a duty of care minister agree that as minister she has a duty of care to minister agree that as minister she has a duty of care to protect minister agree that as minister she has a duty of care to protect New has a duty of care to protect New Zealanders has a duty of care to protect New Zealanders from has a duty of care to protect New Zealanders from dangerous Zealanders from dangerous anthropogenic Zealanders from dangerous anthropogenic climate Zealanders from dangerous anthropogenic climate change Zealanders from dangerous anthropogenic climate change by Zealanders from dangerous anthropogenic climate change by the anthropogenic climate change by the destablisation anthropogenic climate change by the destablisation of anthropogenic climate change by the destablisation of greenhouse anthropogenic climate change by the destablisation of greenhouse gases destablisation of greenhouse gases destablisation of greenhouse gases destablisation of greenhouse gases in the destablisation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere? destablisation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere? To destablisation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere? To the destablisation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere? To the extent in the atmosphere? To the extent that in the atmosphere? To the extent that I in the atmosphere? To the extent that I can. in the atmosphere? To the extent that I can. Given in the atmosphere? To the extent that I can. Given that in the atmosphere? To the extent that I can. Given that the in the atmosphere? To the extent that I can. Given that the Paris that I can. Given that the Paris Agreement that I can. Given that the Paris Agreement makes that I can. Given that the Paris Agreement makes it that I can. Given that the Paris Agreement makes it clear that I can. Given that the Paris Agreement makes it clear that that I can. Given that the Paris Agreement makes it clear that a Agreement makes it clear that a higher Agreement makes it clear that a higher target Agreement makes it clear that a higher target from Agreement makes it clear that a higher target from each Agreement makes it clear that a higher target from each party Agreement makes it clear that a higher target from each party is higher target from each party is necessary, higher target from each party is necessary, will higher target from each party is necessary, will she higher target from each party is necessary, will she commit higher target from each party is necessary, will she commit to necessary, will she commit to setting necessary, will she commit to setting a necessary, will she commit to setting a higher necessary, will she commit to setting a higher target necessary, will she commit to setting a higher target to necessary, will she commit to setting a higher target to reduce setting a higher target to reduce New setting a higher target to reduce New Zealand's setting a higher target to reduce New Zealand's emissions setting a higher target to reduce New Zealand's emissions consistent New Zealand's emissions consistent with New Zealand's emissions consistent with atmospheric New Zealand's emissions consistent with atmospheric stablelisation New Zealand's emissions consistent with atmospheric stablelisation of with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? No, with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? No, I with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? No, I believe with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? No, I believe that with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? No, I believe that our with atmospheric stablelisation of gases? No, I believe that our target gases? No, I believe that our target gases? No, I believe that our target gases? No, I believe that our target is ambitious gases? No, I believe that our target is ambitious and gases? No, I believe that our target is ambitious and fair. gases? No, I believe that our target is ambitious and fair. Given gases? No, I believe that our target is ambitious and fair. Given that is ambitious and fair. Given that for is ambitious and fair. Given that for a is ambitious and fair. Given that for a 1.5 is ambitious and fair. Given that for a 1.5 degree is ambitious and fair. Given that for a 1.5 degree warmer is ambitious and fair. Given that for a 1.5 degree warmer world, for a 1.5 degree warmer world, global for a 1.5 degree warmer world, global emissions for a 1.5 degree warmer world, global emissions must for a 1.5 degree warmer world, global emissions must reduce for a 1.5 degree warmer world, global emissions must reduce by for a 1.5 degree warmer world, global emissions must reduce by 25% global emissions must reduce by 25% between global emissions must reduce by 25% between now global emissions must reduce by 25% between now and global emissions must reduce by 25% between now and 2030 global emissions must reduce by 25% between now and 2030 and global emissions must reduce by 25% between now and 2030 and New global emissions must reduce by 25% between now and 2030 and New Zealand between now and 2030 and New Zealand has between now and 2030 and New Zealand has higher between now and 2030 and New Zealand has higher per between now and 2030 and New Zealand has higher per capita between now and 2030 and New Zealand has higher per capita income between now and 2030 and New Zealand has higher per capita income and has higher per capita income and emissions has higher per capita income and emissions than has higher per capita income and emissions than most has higher per capita income and emissions than most other has higher per capita income and emissions than most other countries emissions than most other countries how emissions than most other countries how can emissions than most other countries how can anything emissions than most other countries how can anything less emissions than most other countries how can anything less than emissions than most other countries how can anything less than 25% emissions than most other countries how can anything less than 25% of how can anything less than 25% of today's how can anything less than 25% of today's levels how can anything less than 25% of today's levels be how can anything less than 25% of today's levels be regarded how can anything less than 25% of today's levels be regarded as how can anything less than 25% of today's levels be regarded as a today's levels be regarded as a rational today's levels be regarded as a rational policy today's levels be regarded as a rational policy for today's levels be regarded as a rational policy for New today's levels be regarded as a rational policy for New Zealand? today's levels be regarded as a rational policy for New Zealand? For rational policy for New Zealand? For New rational policy for New Zealand? For New Zealand rational policy for New Zealand? For New Zealand to rational policy for New Zealand? For New Zealand to lower rational policy for New Zealand? For New Zealand to lower their rational policy for New Zealand? For New Zealand to lower their emissions New Zealand to lower their emissions and New Zealand to lower their emissions and reach New Zealand to lower their emissions and reach 2030 New Zealand to lower their emissions and reach 2030 target, New Zealand to lower their emissions and reach 2030 target, there New Zealand to lower their emissions and reach 2030 target, there will and reach 2030 target, there will have and reach 2030 target, there will have to and reach 2030 target, there will have to be and reach 2030 target, there will have to be significant and reach 2030 target, there will have to be significant changes and reach 2030 target, there will have to be significant changes in have to be significant changes in our have to be significant changes in our behaviours have to be significant changes in our behaviours and have to be significant changes in our behaviours and the have to be significant changes in our behaviours and the emissions our behaviours and the emissions that our behaviours and the emissions that we our behaviours and the emissions that we are our behaviours and the emissions that we are emitting our behaviours and the emissions that we are emitting so our behaviours and the emissions that we are emitting so in our behaviours and the emissions that we are emitting so in the that we are emitting so in the context that we are emitting so in the context of that we are emitting so in the context of that that we are emitting so in the context of that I that we are emitting so in the context of that I believe that we are emitting so in the context of that I believe that that we are emitting so in the context of that I believe that our context of that I believe that our target context of that I believe that our target is context of that I believe that our target is incredibly context of that I believe that our target is incredibly ambitious context of that I believe that our target is incredibly ambitious and target is incredibly ambitious and will target is incredibly ambitious and will take target is incredibly ambitious and will take significant target is incredibly ambitious and will take significant change target is incredibly ambitious and will take significant change and will take significant change and will will take significant change and will play will take significant change and will play a will take significant change and will play a very will take significant change and will play a very small will take significant change and will play a very small and will take significant change and will play a very small and in will take significant change and will play a very small and in some will play a very small and in some respects will play a very small and in some respects insignificant will play a very small and in some respects insignificant when will play a very small and in some respects insignificant when you will play a very small and in some respects insignificant when you look respects insignificant when you look at respects insignificant when you look at it respects insignificant when you look at it in respects insignificant when you look at it in the respects insignificant when you look at it in the global respects insignificant when you look at it in the global perspective, respects insignificant when you look at it in the global perspective, but at it in the global perspective, but significant at it in the global perspective, but significant for at it in the global perspective, but significant for what at it in the global perspective, but significant for what we at it in the global perspective, but significant for what we can at it in the global perspective, but significant for what we can do at it in the global perspective, but significant for what we can do here significant for what we can do here in significant for what we can do here in New significant for what we can do here in New Zealand. My My question My question is My question is to My question is to the My question is to the Minister My question is to the Minister of My question is to the Minister of Revenue: My question is to the Minister of Revenue: What My question is to the Minister of Revenue: What improvements My question is to the Minister of Revenue: What improvements is My question is to the Minister of Revenue: What improvements is the Revenue: What improvements is the Government Revenue: What improvements is the Government making Revenue: What improvements is the Government making to Revenue: What improvements is the Government making to New Revenue: What improvements is the Government making to New Zealand's Government making to New Zealand's tax Government making to New Zealand's tax system? Thropogenic Thropogenic This Thropogenic This Government Thropogenic This Government has Thropogenic This Government has a Thropogenic This Government has a massive Thropogenic This Government has a massive programme Thropogenic This Government has a massive programme of Thropogenic This Government has a massive programme of work Thropogenic This Government has a massive programme of work dedicated massive programme of work dedicated to massive programme of work dedicated to improving massive programme of work dedicated to improving the massive programme of work dedicated to improving the tax massive programme of work dedicated to improving the tax system. massive programme of work dedicated to improving the tax system. Budget to improving the tax system. Budget '17 to improving the tax system. Budget Government to improving the tax system. Budget '17 will make to improving the tax system. Budget '17 will make a to improving the tax system. Budget '17 will make a huge to improving the tax system. Budget '17 will make a huge improvement to improving the tax system. Budget '17 will make a huge improvement to '17 will make a huge improvement to the '17 will make a huge improvement to the tax '17 will make a huge improvement to the tax system '17 will make a huge improvement to the tax system by '17 will make a huge improvement to the tax system by increasing the tax system by increasing after-tax the tax system by increasing the the tax system by increasing after-tax incomes. From the tax system by increasing after-tax incomes. From 1 the tax system by increasing after-tax incomes. From 1 April the tax system by increasing after-tax incomes. From 1 April next after-tax incomes. From 1 April next year after-tax incomes. From 1 April next year the after-tax incomes. From 1 April next year the $14,000 after-tax incomes. From 1 April next year the $14,000 income after-tax incomes. From 1 April next year the $14,000 income tax year the $14,000 income tax threshold year the $14,000 income tax threshold will year the $14,000 income tax threshold will increase year the $14,000 income tax threshold will increase to year the $14,000 income tax threshold will increase to the threshold will increase to the 22,000 threshold will increase to the 22,000 and threshold will increase to the 22,000 and the threshold will increase to the 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will increase to the 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold threshold will increase to the 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will increase. 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will increase. 2.533 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will increase. 2.533 million 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will increase. 2.533 million people 22,000 and the 48,000 threshold will increase. 2.533 million people are increase. 2.533 million people are set increase. 2.533 million people are set to increase. 2.533 million people are set to gain increase. 2.533 million people are set to gain from increase. 2.533 million people are set to gain from this increase. 2.533 million people are set to gain from this tax increase. 2.533 million people are set to gain from this tax package. increase. 2.533 million people are set increase. 2.533 million people are Those aren't the increase. 2.533 million people are Those aren't the only increase. 2.533 million people are Those aren't the only changes. increase. 2.533 million people are Those aren't the only changes. We Those aren't the only changes. We are Those aren't the only changes. We are also Those aren't the only changes. We are also improving Those aren't the only changes. We are also improving the Those aren't the only changes. We are also improving the system Those aren't the only changes. We are also improving the system for are also improving the system for families are also improving the system for families and are also improving the system for families and individuals, are also improving the system for families and individuals, but are also improving the system for families and individuals, but were families and individuals, but were improving families and individuals, but were improving the families and individuals, but were improving the integrity families and individuals, but were improving the integrity of families and individuals, but were improving the integrity of the families and individuals, but were improving the integrity of the tax improving the integrity of the tax system, improving the integrity of the tax system, and improving the integrity of the tax system, and New improving the integrity of the tax system, and New Zealanders improving the integrity of the tax system, and New Zealanders deserve improving the integrity of the tax system, and New Zealanders deserve a system, and New Zealanders deserve a tax system, and New Zealanders deserve a tax system that system, and New Zealanders deserve a tax system that is system, and New Zealanders deserve a tax system that is fair. system, and New Zealanders deserve a tax system that is fair. That system, and New Zealanders deserve a tax system that is fair. That means tax system that is fair. That means everyone tax system that is fair. That means everyone paying tax system that is fair. That means everyone paying their tax system that is fair. That means everyone paying their fair tax system that is fair. That means everyone paying their fair share tax system that is fair. That means everyone paying their fair share and everyone paying their fair share and that everyone paying their fair share and tax everyone paying their fair share and that is why everyone paying their fair share and that is why we everyone paying their fair share and that is why we are everyone paying their fair share and that is why we are cracking everyone paying their fair share and that is why we are cracking down everyone paying their fair share and that is why we are cracking down on that is why we are cracking down on tax that is why we are cracking down on tax avoidance that is why we are cracking down on tax avoidance with that is why we are cracking down on tax avoidance with new that is why we are cracking down on tax avoidance with new measures that is why we are cracking down on tax avoidance with new measures to tax avoidance with new measures to strengthen tax avoidance with new measures to strengthen New tax avoidance with new measures to strengthen New Zealand's tax avoidance with new measures to strengthen New Zealand's rules tax avoidance with new measures to strengthen New Zealand's rules for strengthen New Zealand's rules for taxing strengthen New Zealand's rules for taxing large strengthen New Zealand's rules for taxing large multinationals. strengthen New Zealand's rules for taxing large multinationals. What taxing large multinationals. What improvements taxing large multinationals. What improvements is taxing large multinationals. What improvements is the taxing large multinationals. What improvements is the Government improvements is the Government making improvements is the Government making to improvements is the Government making to improve improvements is the Government making to improve the improvements is the Government making to improve the tax improvements is the Government making to improve the tax system improvements is the Government making to improve the tax system for making to improve the tax system for business? making to improve the tax system for business? The making to improve the tax system for business? The list making to improve the tax system for business? The list is making to improve the tax system for business? The list is very making to improve the tax system for business? The list is very long, making to improve the tax system for business? The list is very long, but business? The list is very long, but I business? The list is very long, but I will business? The list is very long, but I will just business? The list is very long, but I will just give business? The list is very long, but I will just give you business? The list is very long, but I will just give you a business? The list is very long, but I will just give you a few business? The list is very long, but I will just give you a few examples. I will just give you a few examples. We I will just give you a few examples. We are I will just give you a few examples. We are addressing I will just give you a few examples. We are addressing black I will just give you a few examples. We are addressing black Kiel We are addressing black Kiel expenditure We are addressing black Kiel expenditure -- We are addressing black Kiel expenditure -- black We are addressing black Kiel expenditure -- black hole expenditure -- black hole expenditure. expenditure -- black hole expenditure. Under expenditure -- black hole expenditure. Under proposals expenditure. Under proposals released, expenditure. Under proposals released, many expenditure. Under proposals released, many expenditures expenditure. Under proposals released, many expenditures written released, many expenditures written off released, many expenditures written off will released, many expenditures written off will become released, many expenditures written off will become tax released, many expenditures written off will become tax deductible. released, many expenditures written off will become tax deductible. Nice off will become tax deductible. Nice Government off will become tax deductible. Nice Government recognises off will become tax deductible. Nice Government recognises that off will become tax deductible. Nice Government recognises that employee Government recognises that employee share Government recognises that employee share schemes Government recognises that employee share schemes are Government recognises that employee share schemes are an Government recognises that employee share schemes are an important share schemes are an important remuneration share schemes are an important remuneration tool share schemes are an important remuneration tool for share schemes are an important remuneration tool for start-ups. remuneration tool for start-ups. Just remuneration tool for start-ups. Just today remuneration tool for start-ups. Just today I remuneration tool for start-ups. Just today I announced remuneration tool for start-ups. Just today I announced the remuneration tool for start-ups. Just today I announced the release Just today I announced the release of Just today I announced the release of an Just today I announced the release of an issues Just today I announced the release of an issues paper, Just today I announced the release of an issues paper, aimed Just today I announced the release of an issues paper, aimed at of an issues paper, aimed at improving of an issues paper, aimed at improving tax of an issues paper, aimed at improving tax arrangements of an issues paper, aimed at improving tax arrangements to of an issues paper, aimed at improving tax arrangements to make improving tax arrangements to make it improving tax arrangements to make it easier improving tax arrangements to make it easier for improving tax arrangements to make it easier for start-up improving tax arrangements to make it easier for start-up companies improving tax arrangements to make it easier for start-up companies to it easier for start-up companies to use it easier for start-up companies to use employee it easier for start-up companies to use employee share it easier for start-up companies to use employee share schemes. it easier for start-up companies to use employee share schemes. Business use employee share schemes. Business implementation use employee share schemes. Business implementation stage use employee share schemes. Business implementation stage 1 use employee share schemes. Business implementation stage 1 implemented implementation stage 1 implemented in implementation stage 1 implemented in February implementation stage 1 implemented in February made implementation stage 1 implemented in February made it implementation stage 1 implemented in February made it more implementation stage 1 implemented in February made it more simple implementation stage 1 implemented in February made it more simple for in February made it more simple for businesses in February made it more simple for businesses to in February made it more simple for businesses to manage in February made it more simple for businesses to manage tax, in February made it more simple for businesses to manage tax, interact businesses to manage tax, interact with businesses to manage tax, interact with inland businesses to manage tax, interact with inland revenue businesses to manage tax, interact with inland revenue and businesses to manage tax, interact with inland revenue and meet businesses to manage tax, interact with inland revenue and meet GST with inland revenue and meet GST obligations, with inland revenue and meet GST businesses with inland revenue and meet GST obligations, and - with inland revenue and meet GST obligations, and - wait with inland revenue and meet GST obligations, and - wait there with inland revenue and meet GST obligations, and - wait there is obligations, and - wait there is more! obligations, and - wait there is more! - obligations, and - wait there is more! - next obligations, and - wait there is more! - next year, obligations, and - wait there is more! - next year, from obligations, and - wait there is more! - next year, from 1 obligations, and - wait there is more! - next year, from 1 April obligations, and - wait there is more! - next year, from 1 April we more! - next year, from 1 April we will more! - next year, from 1 April we will have more! - next year, from 1 April we will have a more! - next year, from 1 April we will have a reform more! - next year, from 1 April we will have a reform provisional more! - next year, from 1 April we will have a reform provisional tax will have a reform provisional tax pay will have a reform provisional tax pay as will have a reform provisional tax pay as you will have a reform provisional tax pay as you go will have a reform provisional tax pay as you go option, will have a reform provisional tax pay as you go option, which will have a reform provisional tax pay as you go option, which will pay as you go option, which will mean pay as you go option, which will mean that pay as you go option, which will mean that up pay as you go option, which will mean that up the pay as you go option, which will mean that up the 110,000 pay as you go option, which will mean that up the 110,000 small mean that up the 110,000 small business mean that up the 110,000 small business also mean that up the 110,000 small business also pay mean that up the 110,000 small business also pay the mean that up the 110,000 small business also pay the tax mean that up the 110,000 small business also pay the tax they mean that up the 110,000 small business also pay the tax they need business also pay the tax they need to business also pay the tax they need to pay, business also pay the tax they need to pay, as business also pay the tax they need to pay, as they business also pay the tax they need to pay, as they go business also pay the tax they need to pay, as they go every business also pay the tax they need to pay, as they go every month.